Professor Danielle Allen Emily Sneff of The West Sussex Record Office "Lied": “The Sussex Declaration”

 Professor Danielle Allen Emily Sneff of The West Sussex Record Office London England " They Lied": “The Sussex Declaration” I broke the code today, this Document dubbed, “The Sussex Declaration” had a secret message.

 The message was, within our Declaration of Independence Of the United States of America, was this, a bitter complaint against the British Empire because of the United States Constitution, wrote in a clause, That all Debits Foreign Or Domestic Shall be Paid, further binding the New America to a Debit to fight the British Empire, a debit / loan arrange by Parliament.

 It should also be noted that Professor Danielle Allen Emily Sneff, failed to release the information that Ben Franklin signed the Document.

 First the code which is no more then a way, they wrote back around 1200Ad 1700's. This "Cengiefs" , has been investagated. Its all very British.

 In red is the definition.....

Titled as-           TR "Cengiefs"

The Declaration Of The Thirteen States Of America

 TR Cengiefs , which meaning- Cengiefs is willing to hope that the patriotiftri and goad fenfe of your ftate will be influenced \sy motives fo important, and they re- queft, fir, that you will be pleafed

Journals of Congress : Containing the proceedings from Sept. 5, 1774 to [3d day of November 1788] ..."

Cengiefs-  Is Willing To Hope

patriotiftriPatriot- na caout avious ar reo deus recevet avantaich ; maes Quent e tle admira ha meuliar vadelez infinit gant peinie tiftri*a buit ho cragou gant quement a liberalite, Grant Me Liberty- 1774

fenfe- However, I hope, you who have as much good-nature as good fenfe (fmce they generally ... J Good nature and goad fenfe generally are companions, many at hand to corrupt him; who, by throwing in his way the fptendor of fat ft honor, think them) elves JUre of dazzling his goad fenfe and under/landing

 ftate- piece of conducting matter, whether infulated or not, which is in the lame ftate, is brought near it, the light piece of matter will neither attract nor be attracted. ftate. Mr. Franklin, And therefore it is lawful for me to treat him, as one who has put himfelfinto a ftate of War with me, ». t. kill him if I can -, for to that Ha- -zard does he juftly expofe ...

\sy motives- that these parties are influenced in regard to American questions by motives, the tactful woman knew well how to use as a source of permanent influence. ... ne faisoit pasi la moindre plaisanterie qui p(\t choquer, et elle savoit si bien el' ... be her quality, and “watchi' prudence” rather than ambition her motive of action.

 re- queft, fir- Define request: an act of politely or formally asking for something — request in a sentence.

 pleafed- In the following year he was chofen Prpfeflbr of Rhetoric by the Magiftrates and Town-council of Edinburgh; and, in 1762, His Majefty was pleafed to eredl and ... It was for this Reason that I then befought your Majesty to command us once more to attend Tou all together, which your Majesty was pleafed graciously to allow ...

Now as for Ben Franklin's signature, there are many original copies displayed

 The document is the very first draft, it was hidden away for almost 200 years because, it Challenges the British Empire, in our rights to build our own government.

Sussex: Declaration of Independence The Truth Part 2- YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYsaisg2uV8

LOL Tif

Views: 328

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Tif, after looking at the names close up, I change my mind, they were signed by different people.

This is what I found out Hank,

John Penn signatures,

 

Oppps !

 I for got, this is what,Professor Danielle Allen Emily Sneff of The West Sussex Record Office , are saying.about the John Penn signature or John Pinn, looks like a I to me , busted them again...!

William Floyd signatures,

.

Hank guess what I found out..?

William Floyd. Signer of Declaration of Independence, delegate from New York (Continental Congresses of 1774-77 and 1778-83), autograph free frank "Wm. Floyd Free" and address on large part of folded cover to Samuel Hazard at Newtown Conn., the cover has been cleaned, silked and refolded, pencil note indicates that the letter (no longer present) was dated at Philadelphia on Feb. 14, 1780, a Fine and attractive example of this scarce Signer's signature, very rare as a free frank, ex Grunin.

https://siegelauctions.com/lots.php?year=2004&sale_no=887&p...

Continental Congress. The Olive Branch Petition, for example below next photo, Is the Start of the Declaration Of Independence.

The Journals of the Continental Congress show that the petition was ordered to be engrossed on July 5th, 1775, and on July 8th, "The Petition to the King being engrossed, was compared, and signed by the several members." Two copies of the Petition were actually prepared and signed, and according to John Adams, one copy was sent with Richard Penn on one ship on July 9th, and the duplicate was sent in another ship on July 10th. So everyone who signed must have done so at the same time.The US Constitution is another interesting example. We celebrate Constitution Day on September 17, 1787, which is THE DAY when delegates to the Constitutional Convention signed the engrossed parchment document. 38 delegates were present on that day, and there are 39 signatures on the engrossed parchment. John Dickinson was ill, and had George Read sign his name by proxy -- something that didn't happen with the Declaration of Independence, as far as we can tell. Elbridge Gerry wrote to John and Samuel Adams on July 21st, 1776, "Pray Subscribe for me the Declaration of Independence if the same is to be signed as proposed. I think We ought to have the privilege when necessarily absent of voting and signing by proxy." So, unlike the later Constitution, no one voted or signed by proxy for the Declaration of Independence, but they did have the opportunity to sign after the initial day of signing.

https://declaration.fas.harvard.edu/blog/signing

  A lot of William Floyd signatures, did not have "D" at the end of his signature.

 A close up views of the signatures

Now for Official Signatures of John Witherspoon- 1770 to 1776

Their signatures are exquisitely beautiful, and how they abbreviate their names is also beautiful.

They were masters at many things, one of which is 'thinking'. That gift came from a devout knowledge of the wisdom in the Bible.

Hi Jean,

 I am so happy you dropped in, I also agree, they were very smart, and this is why I shared the names, because they say, the signatures are fake, and this document came in a carbon dating of 1780, not 1776, and at the same time they claim the Declaration was not signed on 1776, but some where between May to June 1776.

Computer  Carbon Dating, is not proven reliable in a lot of issues.

 It was the secret message,"Cengiefs" , they did not even try to find out what it was, or they left it out all together.

 The British Empire did not want us to have a Independence, and they sure the heck was not going to allow such a document released, there was something about it, they were afraid to destroy it, so 200 years later, it turned up in England.

Tif

Interesting, to say the least. Why would the signatures be fake? Please explain. No one signs their name the exact same way twice.

Hi Jean,

 The information was updated of the why, found here,Unsullied by Falsehood: The Signing Of The Declaration of Independence .

 The West Sussex Record Office in London England, falsified the signatures and information, our professor, has documented that the signatures are by the founding fathers.

Also found.............

 Their testing pdf that is one line dated 2019, we found 2 entries falsified, to alter (information or evidence) so as to mislead.

 You were correct Tiffany.

Frankly, who gives a hoot ... the Sussex Declaration was never ratified by the Colonies and has no... repeat NO legal binding on US Law or soverignty.

Just what is the beef here .. some old parchment found with what appears to be signatures of our forefathers proposing a separation with England and the Colonies.  Many such attempts... petitions were presented to the King of England, as our Forefather's attempted to avoid war with England. ThisT document may be one of many such historical documents.

This document has no bearing on today's crisis or the principal reason for this Site's existence... Just how does it impact our sovereignty or our Constitutional crisis ... it doesn't.  Stop wasting your time with such diversions from the real problems facing America.

The hyperbole around this discovery is much to do about nothing... by the way since when is a university professor a handwritting expert? I would also like to know ho'w this document is to mislead.. .and who was this document  supposed to mislead and for what purpose... be specific. 

Why would anyone falsify entries or information on this document...  THIS DOCUMENT HAS NO LEGALSTANDING NO MATTER WHAT IT STATES... the true Declaration of Independence and our Constitution superceed anything else being negotiated.

Treaty of Paris (1783) is the controlling leagal document ending the Revolutionary War.  The Treaty of Paris was a formal agreement between America and Great Britain) , signed on September 3, 1783. The signed agreement recognized American independence, established borders for the new nation, and formally ended the Revolutionary War... no other documents superceed that treaty. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Steve Kelley

ALERT ALERT

The Fall Of Fake News!! Quiet Shake-Up At MSNBC After Station Hemorrhages Viewers Following Mueller Debacle 

Reports are surfacing about a quiet shake-up of personnel at MSNBC after the cable news station lost more than 30% of their audience after the Mueller debacle.

Apparently MNSBC doesn’t think their financial woes are newsworthy given that they didn’t run any breathless stories about their own failings.

News of MSNBC’s collapse can’t come as a surprise to insiders who undoubtedly are fully aware that their audience no longer trusts them.

One source familiar told Mediaite the changes came amidst mounting complaints from NBC News chief Andy Lack about a dip in MSNBC’s ratings following the end of the Mueller investigation. In May, ratings for the network in the advertiser coveted 25-54 demo were down 32% year over year.

MSNBC viewers were asked: How much do you agree that MSNBC regularly reports made up or fake news about Donald Trump and his administration?

The responses were devastating! While 35% or respondents agree that MSNBC pushes Fake News, only 24% disagreed. That’s a ratings death sentence!

What do you expect from a channel that boasts disgraced liar, Brian Williams, and race pimp, Al Sharpton?

Bright Start News@BRIGHTstrt
 

MAJOR SHAKEUP AT MSNBC - Ratings crater after Mueller Report Debacle! 

MSNBC Shakeup: Jonathan Wald and Dan Arnall Take Dayside

MSNBC quietly implemented a sweeping shakeup in programming this week, Mediaite has learned, appointing SVP of programming and development Jonathan Wald and MSNBC executive editor Dan Arnall to lead...

Flashback: MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow’s Ratings Plummet To Yearly Low

MSNBC primetime host Rachel Maddow brought in her worst weekly ratings of the year last week.

Her show last week averaged 2,324,000 viewers, with an average audience of 337,000 in the 25-54 age demographic, both of which mark yearly lows for the liberal television host, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Maddow first saw a dramatic drop in ratings following the conclusion of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. Her previous low for a week in 2019 was the last week in March, the first full week after Mueller submitted his conclusion to Attorney General William Barr, where she averaged 2,458,000 viewers with 392,000 in the demo.

She spent two years dissecting every aspect of the special counsel’s investigation into whether President Donald Trump conspired with the Russians to win the 2016 presidential election. The night Mueller submitted his findings to Barr, Maddow appeared to hold back tears over the fact that neither the president nor any family members were indicted.

Compared to Maddow’s low ratings last week, Fox News’ Sean Hannity, whose program is often the most-watched among all cable news shows, averaged 3,108,000 viewers with just under half-a-million viewers in the key demographic.

She also nearly tripled CNN’s Chris Cuomo’s weekly ratings. His program only had 880,000 viewers with 225,000 in the key demo.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service