If you live in Portland, Oregon, and you were going to pack your kids a peanut butter and jelly sandwich for lunch–well, you might want to think twice.

Harvey Scott K-8 School, a public school in Portland, Oregon, has become a nationwide controversy–after the school’s principal, Verenice Gutierrez, declared the childhood favorite “racist.”

Her logic? Peanut butter and jelly is racist–because some immigrant groups don’t eat them.

“What about Somali or Hispanic students, who might not eat sandwiches?” Gutierrez said in an interview with the Portland Tribute. “Another way would be to say: ‘Americans eat peanut butter and jelly, do you have anything like that?’ Let them tell you. Maybe they eat torta. Or pita.”

Since not *all* Americans eat peanut butter and jelly, that apparently means anyone eating it is a horrible racist. So your children should put down the sandwich immediately: lest they “offend” some kids that would rather eat pita bread.

These are the kind of people who are running the system that’s educating of America’s children. People who gets offended by a sandwich.

Unfortunately, Principal Gutierrez has a long history of racism when it comes to how she runs Harvey Scott K-8 School.

During the school’s lunch hour (when, presumably, the offensive sandwiches were served), Harvey Scott K-8 School also offered a segregated lunchtime drum class that’s limited to middle school black and Hispanic boys only. Girls, white boys, or Asian boys are strictly prohibited.

That also attracted controversy. At least one parent, who wrote an anonymous letter, called the race and gender-segregated class “blatant discrimination.”

Gutierrez’s response?

“When white people do it, it is not a problem,” she said. “But if it’s for kids of color, then it’s a problem? Break it down for me. That’s your white privilege, and your whiteness.”

Wanting your children to participate in a taxpayer-funded drum class, but being turned away because of their gender or their skin color, is apparently unfair “privilege” in a public school these days, according to Gutierrez.

But, when a school is run by a principal who actively speaks outs against “racist” peanut butter and jelly, it’s clear that she’s not working for all students at Harvey Scott K-8 School.


Views: 1457

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

PB&J RACIST??!!  It is TRADITIONAL.  You want your child to live here?  This is a normal,, STANDARD lunch qizine for a 10 year old.  And OLDER and YOUNGER!  Nobody at the table in the lunch room (cafeteria) cares a hang what a kid eats.  Untill some low life, with nothing better to do, starts deciding what is good and what is NOT SO GOOD!  WE didn't go to THEIR country and demand changes, but THEY can come here and successfuly do so.  Somethig is wrong here, and it's NOT THE FOOD!  (Muslims getting signs changed because of then mention of BACON, dragging in their shareah 'law' because ours doesn't allow beheading for insulting Muhammad and Allah? And Blacks demanding 'better' standards for their grading in school)  All must STOP!  YOU came.  YOU don't like it?  GO HOME!  THe boats and airplanes run both ways, in about the same length of time!

Lets make them from WHITE peanuts.

Homer Sea 

She obviously hates blacks. The invention of peanut butter is credited to a brilliant black man, George Washington Carver who invented many other things we take for granted today.

That's right.........wonder if the airhead knows that  ;o))))

If you search for - who invented peanut butter - you will find this: While he [Carver] may have made peanut butter, the preparation arose in other cultures independently. The Aztecs were known to have made it from ground peanuts in the 15th century, and Marcellus Gilmore Edson [a Canadian] was awarded U.S. Patent 306,727 (for its manufacture) in 1884, when Carver was 20. There is no indication I have seen that Edson was black, and that is a racist statement if there ever was one.

The peanut butter-jelly sandwich may have originated in the USA per http://www.wikiwand.com/en/Peanut_butter_and_jelly_sandwich but  I found nothing to pinpoint an inventor.

Conclusion: Since the PBJ sandwich is of American origin, the moron at that school is really saying that blacks are not American.

We need to stop listening to stupid people.

You are right, with the parents of these children forcing her resignation or she is fired.  Oh, I forgot, we can't fire a stupid principal, or teachers anymore, they are just left in their positions to continue to help ruin this country with their stupid acts.

Hey parents of children in public schools of Portland Oregon a racist now _Reacts _Against _Commie _Inspired _Satanic _Terror and a bigot is a _Believer _In _God _Over _Tyrants. 

I love PB&J sandwiches.  I eat at least three a week.

I would rather have a PB&J sandwich than the garbage dictated by Obama's wookie wife!





Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich


 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports law.com.

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office. -law.com

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service