Pretend journalist, Jorge Ramos, says illegals who commit identity theft do so to ‘benefit our lives

Image result for identity theftNo doubt you remember Jorge Ramos - the perpetually outraged, virtue-signaling, illegal immigration activist who pretends to be a journalist - from that time President Trump had him thrown out of a press conference.  After it happened, Ramos enjoyed a few extra minutes of fame, made the anti-Trump media rounds, then faded back to his previous level of mid-range notoriety. Unfortunately, with the illegal immigration issue still front-and-center, Ramos rears his head every so often.

His responses are predictable in the extreme:  Illegal immigrants are wonderful. As long as they’re non-violent their myriad crimes are no big deal, and the U.S. should have something close to an open-border policy regarding Mexico.

In fact, if Ramos is to be believed, crimes like identity theft (and the falsification of state and federal documents) are completely justifiable.  Why? Because they’re only committed so that illegals can “benefit our lives.”

From Fox News:

Fusion anchor Jorge Ramos told Chris Wallace on Friday that illegal immigrants coming across the Mexican border “are here to help” American citizens

“They are coming here to benefit our lives,” he said, noting the large amount of undocumented workers in fields such as agriculture.

“The vast majority of undocumented immigrants in this country are not terrorists,” he said, responding to repeated contentions by President Trump that many illegal immigrants are criminals.

Ramos said he has no problem with removing violent criminal illegal immigrants, but disagreed with Wallace when asked about those who use fake ID cards or commit identity theft.

“That is not a violent crime,” Ramos said on “The O’Reilly Factor,” “it is a crime [but] they are coming here to benefit our lives.”

“Many of them use fake drivers’ licenses, why? Because they are working for us,” he said.

This is great news for illegals.  Ramos became a U.S. citizen in 2008.  That means he has a U.S.-based identity and, judging by his comments, he has no problem with it being stolen.  Illegals should feel free to use his Social Security number, address, driver’s license number, license plates, whatever.  Stealing this information is a crime, using it is another, but they’re not violent, so Ramos won’t mind if you do it. You are, after all, just trying to benefit his life.

read more:

http://canadafreepress.com/article/pretend-journalist-jorge-ramos-s...

Views: 528

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Unbelievably stupid liberal loon, but I repeat myself.

A N D   S H I P  T H E M   O U T

lets go I and my family are ready----

So, Jorge, if I come into your home, take all of your money, your jewelry, any art work, any treasures, your furnishings, your "stuff", you won't prosecute me because I am trying to "benefit my life", right? So it's fine with you if I do that, right? 

HEY ..... PatriotGal

NEED AN ACCOMPLICE ? ? ? /

 

Oh give me a break lying illegal aliens don't benifite us at all !!!! we seen that when they all protested and stayed home and No one missed them. And The criminal action only benifites them by letting them get  get social services that they don't have a right to !! milking the Tax payer of Billions of dollars .

A citizen who has been given his citizenship through petition can also be stripped of it.  I'd keep a much lower profile if I were him.  His bloviating proves he lied during his naturalization ceremony.  

this goes beyond stupid   my dog is smarter than this

Ramos needs to be picked up and deported... now! Where are you Pres. Trump?  Where is ICE and the internal enforcement officers of the Border Patrol... pick this illegal alien up and deport him... now.

Trump needs to issue an Executive Order to EXPEDITE ALL DEPORTATIONS... no more hearings, or paid legal representation. If necessary, Trump needs to get Congress to close or restrict all Immigration Courts, from extending citizenship rights to illegal aliens.  Deportation should be automatic... not after a hearing.  An illegal alien is not entitled to due process... we don't have enough courts and judges to go thru such a process... it is too expensive and time consuming and the Leftist and Globalist know it.  

When a Border Patrol agent picks up an illegal alien... an individual without proof of citizenship ... should be taken to a processing center... offered the opportunity to produce proof of their being in the US legally... ICE and or the Border Patrol should conduct a screening of the available citizenship and visa records.  If the subject individual has no proof of being in the country legally... process them for immediate deportation that day.... Then, drop them off at the Mexican border, on the Mexican side... all, within 72 hours of being picked up.

Any appeal by a Deportee should be filed with the US Council on the Mexican side of the border... or in the Deportee's country of origin... not, while they are inside the US... These criminal aliens may obtain a US Attorney, at their own expense, too file an appeal from their home country.. America should NEVER release these illegal aliens, on their own recognizance... too, appear for a deportation hearing latter. 

Process them... on the basis that they must prove they have a legal right to be in country... Give them 72hrs to do so, and if they can't, deport them... No hearing with a court is necessary... No legal representation paid for by tax payers is necessary.  These criminal aliens can pursue challenges to their deportation with a US Council, from Mexico or their home country...

Jorge Ramos and the illegals....GET OUT OF AMERICA NOW! We citizens are FED UP with YOU and YOUR BAGGAGE!

Thank your illegals for the murder of a girl on the west coast. That made her life better.

With this kind of thinking, is it any wonder that Jorge Ramos has NO CREDIBILITY, NONE!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service