President gets Obamacare blowback in online chat

In a format that’s usually friendly to him, President Obama ran smack into complaints about Obamacare Friday from two citizens selected to ask him questions in a virtual “hangout” organized by the White House and the online service Google Plus.

Rebecca Stewart of Covington, Ky., told the president she has had “a really panicked experience” trying to learn whether her 10-year-old son can continue with his specialist physician.

“I cannot keep my plan, which I like,” Mrs. Stewart told the president. “I’ve spent weeks with days on the phone getting confidently delivered wrong answers, conflicting information, and it’s becoming quite obvious to me that a lot of agencies, almost every one I’ve talked to, is having a lot of trouble figuring out the new rules.”

Mr. Obama, taking part in the online chat from the White House, promised to get her an answer by the end of the day.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/31/obama-gets-blowback... 


Views: 876

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

yeah right... unless SHE gets special treatment because of this site alone which is just plain WRONG but then what else is new ???    

Bet they voted for him Guess they thought the only ones who would get hurt were the conservatives. SURPRISE. We tried to warn you.

I am going to hold my breath to find out what news she got ! NOT !

Oren , The fraud and usurper barack hussein obama is not a legal US President and never was a US President . You are giving this pile of garbage barack hussein obama credit for a position he does not legally hold ! It that's not apparent to you already I don't know what to tell you .

Yes, you're right about that, the difficulty comes when we ordinary English speaking humans, are INTENTIONALLY left unaware of the hidden meanings of many of the words that lawyers/liars, use.

To them, to even say "I was in an accident", is an admission of guilt.

When I was in High School I took a class in Business Law. It was full of Right and Wrong! That was 1965. Now the Democrat, control our schools. We no longer teach honesty! Just corruption. 

It is not up to SCOTUS, WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE GOV'T, and if no one does anything about whats going on in Wash. , then it is up to us . PERIOD !!! WHY are WE just letting them run rampant , breaking our laws , when WE can do something besides giving lip service !!!!~

Well all the stupid people voted for the fraud. They deserve what they got. The only

the problem the rest of us with brains are also stuck with this idiot.

I pity all of those MILLIONS of poor people who are victims of Obama's COMMUNIST Federal take over of the insurance industry! Obama Care will soon destroy America's economy and totally destroy the lives of the once properly insured people and the entire medical profession industry!  WELCOME TO YOUR NEW "COMMUNIST" AMERI"K"AN DICTATORSHIP!

And I know what her answer will be:  A BIG LIE

Mrs. Stewart will never be heard from again.

Who think Obama can hear any criticism, or, if he does, who thinks he cares.  He was able to fool enough people to get re-elected.  A big fat Obama middle finger to his critics, is all they will get!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service