Philadelphia: Mosque leaders applying sharia law, try to cut off suspected thief’s hand

The City of Burka-ly Robberies is now stepping up it’s Islamic contributions to America with sharia amputations. via Police: Suspected thief almost gets his hand cut off


Masjid Ar-Razaqq Ul-Karim mosque on 63rd Street (Google Maps)

POLL: Has Obama's foreign policy set the stage for the birth of an Islamic Caliphate?

A leader at a West Philadelphia mosque was arrested for allegedly trying to chop off the hand of a member accused of stealing money from prayer jars, police said Friday.

Merv Mitchell, 37, was arrested Thursday night when police executed a search warrant at Masjid Ar-Razaqq Ul-Karim in the 1100 block of North 63d Street, said Lt. John Walker of Southwest Detectives.

The attack happened after a prayer service Monday morning. Mitchell, also known as Mabul Shoatz, accused the 46-year-old mosque member of the theft.

The accused immediately denied it, but to no avail. Mitchell and the mosque’s imam carried the accused down a flight of stairs to the backyard of the mosque, a converted house, where Mitchell also lives, Walker said.

They put the victim’s wrist on a log, and Mitchell “swung at his wrist, cut through his skin, and cut his tendons, but didn’t make it all the way” because the blade was dull, Walker said.

http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2014/07/19/philadelphia-mosque-...

Views: 1178

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

that is o's people thats what he thinks is loving and just.so the police will probably loose their job for arresting the idiot slim ball muslim

SHUT DOWN THESE SO CALLED PLACES OF WORSHIP THEY ARE NOTHING MORE THAN MUSLIM TERRORIST CENTERS . NO SHARIA LAW! THIS IS AMERICA .
Chris, Obama might get it to be a Muslim country but not till it's a 3rd world country first. First thing first !

These psychopaths do not belong here.  They are obozo's people.  He should go with them back to their world toilets.

It is not a religon it is a brutal Idealogue backed up by Sharia law.

John, why do you often how that you have the right define words in a manner you desire and ignore dictionaries?

Let's put it a different way. Please state your definition of "religion."

Roberto, what are you writing?  It is unintelligible.  Do you proof read what you write?  Try it again, please.  Thanks!

Sorry John, I missed changing ONE word as I'm writing one handed due to a serious accident.

My question is, why do you often show that you have the right to define words in a manner you desire and ignore dictionaries?

Let's put it a different way. Please state your definition of "religion."

Religion is a community belief-in and/or worship-of life creating and life sustaining higher power(s), hence inherently GOOD ...as you can see libshits and mooslimes hijacked the word "religion" then placed bombs on it, no different to placing bombs on palestinian kids, or hijacking the word "liberal" along with many other words listed in a harvard dictionary.

Oleg, I'd say that not ALL religions are good. That certainly applies to Islam and humanism as you rightly imply.

Of course I'm using the word "religion" as defined in dictionaries, not as you and I would use it in terms of morality. While I wasn't using a Harvard dictionary (I don't think there is one), please show me a dictionary that mandates that a belief system must be "good" to be considered a religion. Also, I believe Harvard University uses the Merriam-Webster and Oxford Dictionaries.

If we're going to quibble about word definitions in dictionaries of long standing, how can we make this a successful and moral country?

Roberto, Islam is not JUST a religion.  Islam is a "complete system of life." It's the one part of Nazi-ism that attempted world domination which Hitler lacked; religion.  Adolf tried to do [it] without a god to oversee the heinous operation, but "Prophet" Mohammed saw the flaw in trying to work without a supreme Allah, centuries before Hitler made the idiotic and godless move to a world domination; and, naturally, kill all the Jews.  With Allah, Islam is not just permitted to kill infidels, but each Muslim is obligated to; or burn in the eternal fires of hell.  Wow.  How can you refute that one!!!

Religion by definition is a way of return to morality (=laws of our Creator), if you like a dictionary upheld by turds allied with a koran then its a "religion" to you.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service