Mother Of Son Killed By Illegal to Pelosi: Which Of Your Children Is Expendable For An Illegal?

Views: 1126

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Uhhh, people in sanctuary cities are not disobeying the law, and they are "law-abiding citizens?" So entering into our country illegally means that you haven't broken the law? Ok, makes sense. And one more thing Piglosi, illegals are NOT citizens! 

Illegal entry into the USA, is an invasion! TIME FOR WAR!

I have neighbors who are most likely illegal. They are dirty, shanty building, nasty pigs who attack my daughter. Have dogs running loose. I have called the Henderson Country sheriff's department in East TX numerous times. The deputies always ask them if I threatened them. So how do we go about war when our own supposed constitutional abiding sheriff's departments take their side? I would love to remove my neighbors with force, but would only end up in jail or dead.I have children and a wife, so a lot of good that would do them. They have 8 or 9 cars. 3 zero turn mowers, 3 trailers for construction work, etc. So we know they get benefits from our government and somebody hires them for cash, etc. Would anyone like to help make a statement? It would require at least 500 red blooded Americans to stand up and do that. Otherwise just another crazy redneck racist.

Don't know which state Henderson's in, but hopefully it's red? Now that we have an entirely different administration bent on protecting Americans First, you might find the sheriffs leaning more on the side of Americans.  If not, start making anonymous phone calls questioning the apparent "illicit" goings-on; and/or call them and tell them people are making bombs; and/or report them for defrauding the government....someone should answer! Once we get all our nominees in place, welfare won't be an easy thing to get or keep, especially if the offenders are thought to be illegals.

All I know is that all sheriffs need to be retaught. There jobs are not supposed to be serving papers taking people's property away. They are supposed to be the last link in defensive forces at the local level to protect us. The dam govt. is supposed to protect it's citizens. That is their first responsibility, and instead, they are attacking us at every level.

Report them to the SSA...

Anyone on welfare is not allowed to earn any income without reporting the income to the SSA. They are allowed to earn up to the benefit amount they receive, then SSA starts to reduce the benefit they receive equal to the amount they earn above the benefit. Once they receive twice the benefit amount, they're cut off. That's allowed to help them transition back to the workforce.

If these snowflakes don't report the income, the SSA is allowed to dock a portion of their payments until the SSA recoups the entire amount owed.

That's real nice for them.  I am on VA disability but I am able to work a little. The problem comes when my employer reports my earnings to IRS; the politicians in their infinite wisdom have declared that every penny that I may earn while on VA disability causes a penny reduction in my VA benefits (medical in my case)

It's nice to hear that the welfare queens are allowed to earn up to their benefit amount without loss of their free government money.

I guess that the money for them comes from the many thousands of veterans' benefits

Hopefully this will end under President Trump.  I believe some of law enforcement are still operating under Obama's policies right now.  But I'd be on the phone to a Senator and/or Governor Abbott.

How about having a talk with your local motorcycle chapter, even peacefully they can be quite intimidating .

They are at war with us, just like the muslime animals, whether we admit it or not.  That means we can and WILL LOSE this war without ever admitting we are in it thanks to politicians and liberals who are BETRAYING us while they get rich.


Related image

Nancy Pelosi is talking out of both sides of her mouth. Law abiding people aren't anyone who is in this country illegally. They're already law breakers!




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service