Harney County Sheriff David Ward, who has shown himself to be an unconstitutional sheriff, is responsible for removing a reporter from an open assembly in Oregon for simply asking a question about the Constitution.
Ward, unable and unwilling to actually deal with the constitutionality of the situation surrounding the Hammond Ranch, the Bureau of Land Management or those who are protesting offered hollow words to the crowd gathered.
However, one patriot report stood up in the midst of the complacency of Sheriff Ward who encouraged the protesters to "go home."
Some stood by Sheriff Ward. Among them was Oregon State Representative Cliff Bentz who claimed that the occupiers of the wildlife refuge were breaking the Privacy Act of 1974, for trespassing on federal land. What he failed to mention were all the reporters who were apparently also trespassing on that same land. He failed to acknowledge the Constitution's limitation on what land the federal government can own and for what purposes.
When challenged on these issues by reporter Pete Santilli, who asked, "What about the Constitution?" people began to boo him and he cited the Constitution for his right to free speech.
Santilli also cited Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17, just as Ammon Bundy did regarding the issue of federal land.
Santilli was removed for "disrupting" the meeting, which is absolute nonsense and unconstitutional. It is a jack booted thug approach to silencing dissent and has nothing to do with disrupting the meeting that was going on. It was pointing people back to the law that is supposed to govern even those who are entrusted and elected to enforce the law.
Wink at this end of the trail to the demise of the globalist banking cabal that owns the establishment lackeys, we need to be ready for the blood and guts part of the retaliation that may well come. But mostly, they have controlled through fear of repercussion.They have circled the wagons and can not withstand the wrath they have caused.
We will not forgive them for they know what they are doing. Their last act will be when they let the Genie out of the bottle. The full wrath of the American people will be upon them.
Wink, thats an old saying I just made up.
Wink, Daboo is right. But the Saudi's have been buying land in Arizona for quite a while now. I am seeing way to many middle eastern men in this city. Six of them in one grocery store not buying anything, just standing around talking and it was NOT English. They were looking the store over, not the products.
Lot of officials seem to be above the LAWS that govern them. Many are openly criminal, like Obama.
Aren't Sheriffs sworn to protect and uphold the Constitution?
In most states the Sheriff's do take that Oath. Using the City and County of San Francisco as an example, the following applies.
The reason I used that particular County was because of the recent murder of a young woman by an illegal alien male, the story of which was all over the national news and also a proposed law that Bill O'rielly of Fox News had put forward with the congressional members.
That law failed in the U.S. Senate.
Now, the reason that many of the sheriffs are reluctant to act in accordance with their oath is because of heavy political pressure.
Just as is the case in Nevada's Clark County, in the Bundy Ranch case and as we are seeing it again in the current situation in Harney County, Oregon.
Obviously, behind the scenes, there is BIG money in play as was and is the case in Bunkerville Nevada and the Bundy Ranch.
There are a few sheriffs in Arizona that are standing tall on the issue of illegal aliens.
Face it, we have a criminal government who will not enforce our laws. If any Sheriff's do enforce they get hounded by the president. Some country this is anymore. All for the criminals and to hell with the law abiding tax paying people.