Open Letter To Nancy Pelosi: A Few Reasons People Just Might Think You’re Crazy

Dear Nancy:

As bombshell after bombshell dropped on the deepening Benghazi scandal last week, I couldn’t help but notice that you felt compelled to make a fool out of yourself a statement on the damning new revelations.

“Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. Why aren’t we talking about something else?”

Maybe it’s just me, but perhaps it’s because internal White House emails prove that it was the administration – not the CIA – who altered the talking points that were given to Susan Rice so she could lie mislead the American people on five different Sunday talk shows. Whaddya think?

POLL: Should Voter ID be required in every state?

Anyway, it got me thinking: this wasn’t your first rodeo when it comes to making ridiculous controversial comments. Remember this one when you weighed in on unemployment in 2010?

“Unemployment benefits are creating jobs faster than practically any other program. It injects demand into the economy. It creates jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name.”

The thing is, even it were true, it kinda made you look completely out to lunch uninformed, don’t you think? Especially to people desperately looking for a job.

Then there was this gem from just a couple of months ago:

“I don’t think [Obama's] ever done anything for political reasons”

read more:

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/05/135562-open-letter-nancy-pelosi-rea...

Views: 1146

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

j hate this leather face creep , she should rot in hell along with harry reid . two decipcable  people.I HATE THEM

Leather head, that's the ticket!   Hate is an emotion like any other.  It is so tiring to hear people tell us to stay positive.  That is for our leadership, they must.  For the chess pieces known as pawns, or activists, we should be going absolutely bezerk to drive our points home.  Anything to get the vote out, including hatred of Nancy Pees million mile club card!  Rip her to shreds.

She's just another thug of the Obozo administration twisting what she hopes will impress all those voters who voted for the color of skin, as opposed to someone who might know something about leadership.

WHAT IS WRONG IN CALIFORNIA ? THEY ALL MUST BE INSANE OR ALL DOPED UP, THEY KEEP RETURNING THIS (MENTAL CASE) BACK TO CONGRESS, WHERE SHE HAS MADE SOME OF THE MOST INANE STATEMENTS ANYONE HAS EVER HEARD OF ???????????????????????????????

AREN'T THERE ANY CHRISTIANS IN CALIFORNIA ?  SURELY THEY MUST REALIZE SHE IS A VERY SERIOUS THREAT TO YOUR WELL-BEING ...!!! 

BUT, ALAS, THEY SEEM TO THINK ITS "FUNNY" TO RE-ELECT THIS "LOON"..                      @$%#$*&)#@*^&$% ????

The Liberal loons in California will never learn.

That about says it.

nutty nan does it again

PELOSI  DOES IT AGAIN!  MAKING STATEMENTS OUT OF HER A-S!  SHE MUST BE TAKING AN OVERDOSE OF HER STUPID/IDIOTIC PILLS.  OR, IT JUST MAY BE HER FACIAL AND HEAD SKIN THAT IS STRETCHED SO TIGHT, TO COVER UP HER FLABBY WRINKLES, THAT IT'S EFFECTING HER VOICE/BRAIN EFFORT!  THE OLD HAYBAG SHOULD DO THE COUNTRY A FAVOR AND JUST RESIGN.  BUT, THE NIMRODS WHO LIVE IN MY HOMETOWN (SF),  WILL JUST CONVINCE HER TO RUN AGAIN.  THE POOR(IN BRAINS) HAG WILL JUST GO WITH THE FLOW AND FOLLOW HER KING, OBAMORAT!

Can you believe she was once the Speaker of the House in congress !!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service