Ohio Bill introduced to regulate men's reproductive health

Before getting a prescription for Viagra or other erectile dysfunction drugs, men would have to see a sex therapist, receive a cardiac stress test and get a notarized affidavit signed by a sexual partner affirming impotency, if state Sen. Nina Turner has her way.

The Cleveland Democrat introduced Senate Bill 307 this week.

A critic of efforts to restrict abortion and contraception for women, Turner says she is concerned about men’s reproductive health. Turner’s bill joins a trend of female lawmakers submitting bills regulating men’s health. Turner said if state policymakers want to legislate women’s health choices through measures such as House Bill 125, known as the “Heartbeat bill,” they should also be able to legislate men’s reproductive health. Ohio anti-abortion advocates say the two can’t be compared.

read more:


Views: 814

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

and telling us what hand we may wipe our butts with.


The democrats/ liberals/progressives/communist are control freaks. 

The revolution is here. Pick a side and take action. Stoo complaining and start doing. 

These Dems ate really sick monsters! Wake up you left idiots!
Won't let me post
what did you try to post?
How about we regulate how much air can go in and out of their lungs with a parachute cord?

Ok folks calm down and laugh it off. Or, gently tell her that no one is suggesting banning contraception. The Catholic Church is only stating that it is against their beliefs. We do oppose abortion on wholly different grounds. It is wrong for every one involved.

It IS about time the human male takes responsibility for this.

And this is what we pay taxes to support... has anybody ever thought of disbanning all
government agencies due to abjunct stupidity, and a total waste of time and money.
Just think of tha great things that you could do in private business with all the dollars
paid into de gooooberment for the idiot politicians to ride on the turnip truck, and totally
waste everybodies money and time.
Reduce goooberment agencies to Co-ops, where everybody has a peice of the pie, and
we all loose or gain on how well the whole local co-op functions under our, the peoples
control.  This is the way government agencies are suposed to work, but  the elected
clowns quickly forget they work for the citizens, and its the citizens  who really need to
decide how and what to pay them. all government pay needs to be voted on by the citizens..
not the  politicians...Do you get to vote yourself a raise at your job,  I doubt it.  Then why in
hell do politicians get to vote themselves raises, benefits, and retirement bennies.  ON YOUR
DOLLAR..... ..... ..... .....

to waste the citizens ( TAxpayers money) for idiotic and assinine issues like this, the creator
of any such bill should be stripped of any title, all pay and benefits, and imediatly escorted off
any government premis, and totally banned from any further contact with any government
agency, except to be prosecuted for being a sorry arsed excuse trying to impersonate a human
being, with a brain.  now we have the inmates runing the assylym.........



   Just more trash from the myriad of filthy sluts that make up the progressive DEMONRATS  character .




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service