Obama: ‘We Cannot Deny the Legacy of Racism’ in Justice System

Image result for justice system is racist obamaPresident Barack Obama is finishing his term with a lengthy essay on criminal justice reform in the Harvard Law Review, arguing that Americans should recognize systemic racism in the system.

“[W]e cannot deny the legacy of racism that continues to drive inequality in how the justice system is experienced by so many Americans,” Obama wrote in his 56 page essay.

Obama cited studies from the NAACP showing that African-Americans and Hispanics were more likely to be stopped by law enforcement officials and suffer stricter penalties in court.

“If we are to chart honestly the path for criminal justice reform, we must confront the role of race and bias in shaping the policies that led us to this point,” Obama wrote.

read more:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/05/obama-cannot-den...

Views: 394

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

obama is right about racism in the justice system. holder and lynch are 2 of the biggest bigots to be attorney generals

Hey Obama if you had a son he would be a little bitch like you ass hole and if you are so concerned about black lives why have you done nothing to help but praise the very criminal element that is doing all the killing, you Obama are the worst thing to come along for Black America in a hundred years !   

Yep, from the most racist of all presidents. 13 more days!!

If we are to believe a study on Racism the study can't be done by the most racist group in America. The NAACP is full of the likes of Sharpton and Jackson there will never be a true study or facts with there influence. I believe there is racism only because it's forced on other races. The problem is the act of the CivilRights Bill by Johnson was put in place by one of the most racist President's in American history. Johnson used the "N" word on a daily bases and was on tape saying it often. Most of the educated black who work and have corp. jobs knows the past will never die as long as one side is forced on the other.

The Civil Rights Act was a horrible act.

I believe the races/nations should be separated for peace.   Multiculturalism, diversity is the tool of the communist party.

Would have to agree, it was once. Destruction of our Culture, diluting the Intelligence Pool.

obama is a racist himself!

Studies from the NAACP on Black Crime... are about unbiased and as trustworthy as a Palestinian study on Israel's right to exist as a State.  This debate is a non-sequitur... The MSM's bias is no better. 

Blacks are in prison because they committed criminal acts... not because of racism. In fact, there would be more Black's in prison if they were treated with the same judicial temperament as Caucasian's who were convicted of similar crimes... Instead, the judiciary often coddled and excuse Black criminals as if they were the victims of criminal conduct and racial bias.

Many studies demonstrate that Black on White crime is considerably higher than White on Black criminal conduct... Other studies indicate that Black on Black Crime, results from serious social brake-down in the Black family and community, not from any overt racial bias. Until the NAACP stops excusing Black crime, blaming it on racism, and focuses on the real problems, within the Black family and community, Black crime will continue to be a serious problem.

My thought is that the black people find it difficult to live in a white peoples nation.  A nation of law and order.  The U.S. is, was and will always be a white nation.

All non white people need to be in their countries, but they will always want what the white man has created, founded..

"All non white people need to be in their countries,"???  So....what would you suggest be done with First Nations people?

Yes, I would like to know, what about the Cherokee, the Lakota, and a matter a fact, 10's of thousands of China men who helped build America.

 I could go on and on, so if we are not all white by birth, where do some suggest we go...?

The Lakota... robbed their lands from the Cro-Magnon White population that arrived here in 1BC ... just after being thrown out of Eden by God. So, the Lakota need to pay back rent on the land for the last 5000 years at the going rate of 250/acre or 630 trillion dollars.

The real problem comes in collecting from those rascals... the Cherokee, whose ancestors owe back rent on half of the United States and toll fees for illegally crossing the US from the Carolina's to Oklahoma... leaving lots of junk on the way to be cleaned up by the other native populations... whose rent is also due.

Just Kidding... LOL ... just kidding.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

The cartoonist's homepage, indystar.com/opinion/varvel

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service