(Breitbart) – Symbols matter throughout the world, but no more so than in the Middle East. So President Obama’s no-show in Paris, where an unprecedented million-and-a-half people marched, with over 40 world leaders to show the world that they will not be intimidated by Islamic terrorism, was an embarrassment for all Americans, and one that’s likely to cause more problems.

Like it or not, the Ummah (Muslim world) seems likely to take that absence as another subtle message that Obama stood with the Islamic Jihadis who were defending the Prophet Mohammed.

For the supposed leader of the free world to be a no-show was an affront to Western democracies. The Obama Administration is now in full damage control mode by admitting it made an “error.” Was it an error or deliberate?

President Obama was not alone in his Paris no-show. If the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, who is number two in line for the presidency, and the new Senate Majority leader, Mitch McConnell, had the political courage to stand up for freedom and democracy, they both would have been in Paris showing the world where the United States Congress stands.

Of course, there have been many signals by the Obama Administration that the mainstream media have chosen to ignore or underplay.

For example, in his June 4, 2009 Cairo “outreach” speech to the Muslim world, he gave some insight when he stated that he considered part of his responsibility as President of the United States was to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear. I don’t think such a statement is in his oath of office.

Furthermore, he signaled his support for the “Arab Spring” Islamic uprisings. Both al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood understood by that signal that the United States under President Obama would not stand in their way in the revolution to come. Finally, in his September 2012 speech to the U.N. General Assembly, Obama declared “that the future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.” That should have dispelled any doubt.

America’s response to the Arab Spring represented a dramatic shift in our Middle East policy that would have major consequences for America’s standing in that region and beyond. The “Arab Spring” was promoted by the Administration as a freedom and democracy movement. It was not even a close call. It was an Islamist “supremacist” awakening!

Under the Obama Administration, key was the fact that we “switched sides” in the Islamic Jihad wars and dumped our allies in the Global War on Terror. We were now supporting al-Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood (MB) affiliated militias and rebels, many of which fought against our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/obamas-signals-muslim-world-79305/#sthash.P...

Views: 836

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

TREASON'S ADDRESS IS 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.

In the white colored house right?

I'm surprised he hasn't painted it black

Obama is a satan worshipping diaperhead, as evil as was Hitler!!!!!

Again Bob, I am in total agreement.

agree.

agreed

We the American people are reaping what we sow. We allowed this to happen folks. Now we the people have to correct it by any means possible to save our country.

You got that right...God help us in our quest!

Obama's friends, Islamic Jihadists.

Truth and fact Ms. Richardson.

Administrations as sophisticated as ours don't make such open and obvious errors... This was not only deliberate, it was calculated, to encourage more jihadist terrorism.  It is time that Congress takes up IMPEACHMENT of this President for high crimes and misdemeanors... there is certainly sufficient evidence to make a probable cause case for crimes ranging from gun running to treason.  

The Arab Spring and his release of Muslim Combatants,  illegal arms running to Islamic terrorist groups, open financial support for Muslim terrorist organizations, all smack of 'aiding and abetting' the enemies of the United States. These events alone stand as evidence in support of the classical definition of treason.

Libya and Bengahzi caught this Administration in gun running schemes and directly involved in the destabilizing of Moderate Secular States in the Mid-East.  Pres. Obama's finger prints are all over several clandestine gun running and covert training schemes that support ISIL, ISIS, Al Qaeda and other Islamic Terrorist organizations,  declared enemies of the United States. We don't arm and train our enemies, nor should we release their leaders to return to the field as combatants.. 

The President's political appointments of questionable members or former associates of radical Islamic groups is not only reckless, it gives aid to and abets known enemies of the United States.  His snubbing of US Allies in preference for radical elements of Islam (Hamas, PLO, Muslim Brotherhood, etc) raise questions that should NEVER be raised regarding a Presidents loyalty.

In addition, to all the highly unorthodox usurpations and interpretations of the Constitution this President has engaged in, there remain serious allegations, supported by admissible EVIDENCE, that the President ascended FRAUDULENTLY to  the Office of President.  The 'Birther Issues' are not a wacko conspiracy theory  They have firm evidence of collusion, to doctor the President's Birth Certificate and other significant documents, including: selective service, social security, and Educational documents... all of which had a direct impact on his being elected to the Office of President.

There is enough evidence and open questions to bring this President before Congress in an Impeachment Trial ... too, determine what the facts one way or another.   The President should be Impeached immediately... he may well prove to be a serous threat and danger to the security of the United States. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Michael RamirezPolitical Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

ALERT ALERT

YIKES!!! Chelsea Clinton Emphatically States A Person With A Beard And A Penis Can ‘Absolutely’ Identify As A Woman

  • The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification
  • In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons about transgender self-identification
  • Chelsea Clinton replied ‘yes’ emphatically when asked if someone with a beard and penis can ever be a woman
  • ‘It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently,’ Hillary said
  • Aitkenhead said Hillary became ‘uneasy’ when the question was asked while Chelsea shot a ‘furious stare’ at the journalist as her mother answered
  • Hillary added: ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw’

(Daily Mail) – It may appear Hillary and Chelsea Clinton always see eye-to-eye, but in a recent interview one topic cracked the facade of the like-minded mother-daughter power duo.

The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons if someone with a beard and a penis can ever be a woman, to which Chelsea replied emphatically, ‘Yes.’

However, as Aitkenhead describes it, Hillary looked ‘uneasy’, and blamed generational gaps for being less accepting.

‘Errr. I’m just learning about this,’ Hillary responded. ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw. It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently.’

The Clintons sat sown with Aitkenhead to promote the book they co-authored, The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience.

The book features Danica Roem, the first trans woman elected to a U.S. state legislature.

According Aitkenhead’s account, she tells Hillary during the interview that many British feminists of Hillary’s generation have a problem with the idea that a ‘lesbian who doesn’t want to sleep with someone who has a penis is transphobic.’

Hillary nods in agreement, while Chelsea ‘stiffens and stares at me’, according to Aitkenhead.

The journalist then adds that many women of Hillary’s generation are uncomfortable with biological males sharing women’s bathrooms.

‘I would say that, absolutely,’ Hillary nods firmly. ‘Absolutely. Yes.’

That’s when Chelsea begins shooting a ‘furious stare’ at Aitkenhead, who points it out to her.

‘I’m a terrible actor’, Chelsea laughs.

Chelsea then says she is thrilled with the National Health Service’s decision to assign patients to single-sex wards according to the gender they identify as, instead of their biological make up.

‘How can you treat someone if you don’t recognize who they feel and know in their core they are?’ Chelsea says.

‘And I strongly support children being able to play on the sports teams that match their own gender identity,’ she adds. ‘I think we need to be doing everything we can to support kids in being whoever they know themselves to be and discovering who they are.’

At this point Hillary looks conflicted.

‘I think you’ve got to be sensitive to how difficult this is,’ Hillary says. ‘There are women who’d say [to a trans woman], ”You know what, you’ve never had the kind of life experiences that I’ve had. So I respect who you are, but don’t tell me you’re the same as me.” I hear that conversation all the time.’

Despite the clear tension in the room, the pair say they don’t argue about this topic.

But according to Aitkenhead, ‘I get the impression they don’t like to present anything less than a united front to the world.’

BONUS VIDEO

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service