Obama not on Smithsonian’s ’100 most significant Americans’ list; liberals in shock over who is!

The “Smithsonian” magazine compiled a list of the “100 most significant Americans,” and to the dismay of his fan base President Obama failed to make the cut.

Adding insult to injury, former President George W. Bush made the list. But it gets even better, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was also included.

The liberal website Raw Story bemoaned the very idea that the Smithsonian Institution “decided that George W. Bush is a more ‘significant’ figure in U.S. history” than the exalted one.

Curiously, the only redeeming qualification Raw Story named when mentioning Obama is that he was the country’s first black president — former President Bill Clinton notwithstanding.

According to the website, there were eleven former presidents included, with Bush listed seventh. The others in the “Presidents” category include: Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Ulysses S. Grant, Ronald W. Reagan, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, James Madison, and Andrew Jackson.

But no Obama.

more:

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/11/22/obama-not-on-smithsonians-10...

Views: 933

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Now b.o. will sick the IRS, DHS, ATF, and Michelle on the Smithsonian.

@Bryan W. Carpenter,

Oh no, not Michelle, there goes the great cafeteria menu, reduced to yuck food that gives you a big butt like Michelle's.......

They should take Wilson and FDR off the list too

Agreed----Socialists should not  make anything but the S----  List!

I agree.  Wilson was the one that changed the Democratic Party to a Socialist-Communist Party.  Wilson also convened a Private Democrat meeting to enact both the Federal Reserve Act AND Federal Income Tax Act.

FDR nearly kill the country with his "Shovel Ready" jobs and other acts to try to stop the depression prior to entering WWII and then lied and duped the black populace to voting for him by promising free money to pay for food, living expense and other expenses in return to train them into valuable skills.  The training never materialized.  WWII was the only thing that kept FDR from being the worse President in History (until Obama).

FDR also created Social Security and bigger government in programs such as Workfare.  He also was the one that told businesses to either give the working class wage increases, OR pay for the Health Insurance (by giving tax breaks and other incentives to businesses who complied) for the employees.

Both of these Presidents believed Socialism would eliminate the poor of our country.  All it did was to make the poor more poor.

AMEN TO THAT BOTH WERE SOCIALIST THAT HARMED OUR COUNTRY

They should take Abraham Lincoln off too.  He was a tyrant just like Obummer.  It's no wonder Obummer likes Lincoln so much.

Yea, what's up with that!?  DaddyO scored a Pulitzer be fo he even did sheit. 

OH OBOO-BOO and HIS liberal crybabies will throw a TANTRUM NOW....!!

THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT GOOD, PATRIOTIC AMERICAN  LIST..., NOT SIGNIFICANTLY BAD, TREASONOUS  AND UN-AMERICAN LIST....!! 

Yeah Americans are on it, no Kenyans!!!

Yep...!! : )

RSS

ONE NATION UNDER GOD

ALERT ALERT

 After Years Of Stagnation Under Obama 
Household Income Hits 50-Year High

Image result for money

Former President Barack Obama got plenty of praise for shepherding us through the recovery from the 2008 economic crisis. However, those on Main Street, USA, knew the truth — things weren’t any better than they had been when George W. Bush left office.

As The Weekly Standard reported in 2016, median household income when Obama came into office in 2009 was $56,731. In 2015, six years into his presidency, that number was $56,516 — a decrease of just over $200.

By the time he left office, it’s true that media household income had risen to $59,471 — but that was essentially the same as it had been in December, 2007, at the end of the “Great Recession” and just a few weeks before Obama took office, when it was $59,549.

So, how’s The Donald doing?

Well, as Investor’s Business Daily reported, a new study from Sentier Research found that the median household income in April was $61,483 — a 50-year high.

That’s up from $59,471 in January of 2017.

The firm tracks income using census data and adjusts for inflation — so even a slightly weaker dollar doesn’t account for the increase.

Donald Trump Jr.   @DonaldJTrumpJr  

Bad News For Dems: Household Income Hits All-Time High Under Trump … And He's Getting Credit For It!!! 

Household Income Hits All-Time High Under Trump, And He's Getting Credit For It

A new report shows that the median household income has climbed 3% since President Trump took office. It's another sign of a strong economy, and at least one poll shows the public credits Trump for...

That’s great news for the country, but maybe not the best news for Democrats.

“This is just another indication that the economy has notably strengthened under Trump. And polls show that the public’s mood has brightened considerably as a result,” Investor’s Business Daily reported.

“The latest IBD/TIPP Economic Optimism Index is 53.6. This index has been in positive territory (anything over 50 is optimistic) since Trump took office. The Quality of Life Index, meanwhile, hit a 14-year high in May and the Financial Stress Index is at an all-time low.”

That economic data is followed by a lot of polls that seem to show that the “blue wave” expected in the November midterms breaking and rolling back into the sea.

A new Reuters poll found that a generic Republican would beat a generic Democrat by six points. Back in March, the Democrats were up by nine points. A CBS poll found that Democrats had a two-point advantage on the generic ballot — hardly “wave” material.

The CBS poll also found that 68 percent of Americans believed Trump’s policies deserved at least some of the credit for the economic situation, with 35 percent saying he deserved a “great deal” of the credit.

Sixty-four percent of respondents rated the economy as “somewhat good” or “very good.” In a CNN poll, 57 percent of voters said that “things are going well in the U.S.” In February, that was 49 percent.

Perhaps the most important figure: Under Obama, when Gallup asked whether it was a good time to find “a quality job in the U.S.,” the highest number that administration ever achieved was 45 percent. Under Trump, that number is 67 percent — the highest number in the 17-year history of the poll.

While Trump’s personal numbers haven’t seen the same bounce, they’re still up — and that’s the important thing. Thanks to the relentless campaign of personal attacks against him, Trump’s stated approval rating has always been a lot lower than it probably is.

Don’t believe me? Just ask Hillary Clinton. For all of the personal barbs and attacks, 2016 ultimately came down to the economy. So will 2018 — and that’s not good news for the Democrats.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service