Norway: 14 Year Old Commits Suicide After Racially Motivated Gang Rape

The media is trying to cover up this story.

Eva Helgutan was brutally gang raped by Muslim immigrants in Trondheim, Norway. Her family says she became increasingly depressed and committed suicide.
Police say a number of white Norwegian girls have been brutally gang raped by immigrants in Trondheim. Police say they target only white Norwegian victims. Eva was one of three young Norwegian girls gang raped by immigrants within a few days of each other.
Since the opening of their borders, rapes have exploded in Scandinavia. The majority of all violent rapes in Scandinavia are committed by immigrants from Africa and the Middle East.
 They even ban the video on YouTube, it violated their rules against exposing violent crimes against whites.
 
The original video that accompanied this post has been removed. This is a new video that actually shows this beautiful Scandinavian young girl just weeks before those sub-human Muslim paedophiles defiled and raped her.
[Den originale videoen som fulgte dette innlegget har blitt fjernet. Dette er en ny video som faktisk viser dette vakre skandinaviske ung jente bare uker før de sub-menneskelige muslimske pedofile uren og voldtok henne. Tror du noe av dette ville være å gå på hvis Hitler hadde vunnet krigen?]
Hat tip to bains (comment on the British Resistance site) for this video.
 

Views: 106

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

                              UN Immigration Policies

They should find these animals and then make fertilizer out of them.

 I would personally, take them to the woods, dig a grave, put them in it, set them on fire alive, and set back and have a beer.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

 Judge Orders Mueller To Prove  Russia Meddled In Election 

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich

A Washington federal judge on Thursday ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to clarify election meddling claims lodged against a Russian company operated by Yevgeny Prigozhin, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Bloomberg.

Concord Management and Consulting, LLC. – one of three businesses indicted by Mueller in February along with 13 individuals for election meddling, surprised the special counsel in April when they actually showed up in court to fight the charges. Mueller’s team tried to delay Concord from entering the case, arguing that thee Russian company not been properly served, however Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the request – effectively telling prosecutors ‘well, they’re here.’

Concord was accused in the indictment of supporting the Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Russian ‘troll farm’ accused of trying to influence the 2016 US election.

On Thursday, Judge Freidrich asked Mueller’s prosecutors if she should assume they aren’t accusing Concord of violating US laws applicable to election expenditures and failure to register as a foreign agent.

Concord has asked Dabney to throw out the charges – claiming that Mueller’s office fabricated a crime, and that there is no law against interfering in elections.

According to the judge’s request for clarification, the Justice Department has argued that it doesn’t have to show that Concord had a legal duty to report its expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Rather, the allegation is that the company knowingly engaged in deceptive acts that precluded the FEC, or the Justice Department, from ascertaining whether they had broken the law. -Bloomberg

On Monday, Friedrich raised questions over whether the special counsel’s office could prove a key element of their case – saying that it was “hard to see” how allegations of Russian influence were intended to interfere with US government operations vs. simply “confusing voters,” reports law.com.

During a 90-minute hearing, Friedrich questioned prosecutor Jonathan Kravis about how the government would be able to show the Russian defendants were aware of the Justice Department and FEC’s functions and then deliberately sought to skirt them.

“You still have to show knowledge of the agencies and what they do. How do you do that?” Friedrich asked.

Kravis, a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, argued that the government needed only to show that Concord Management and the other defendants were generally aware that the U.S. government “regulates and monitors” foreign participation in American politics. That awareness, Kravis said, could be inferred from the Russians’ alleged creation of fake social media accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. citizens and “computer infrastructure” intended to mask the Russian origin of the influence operation.

“That is deception that is directed at a higher level,” Kravis said. Kravis appeared in court with Michael Dreeben, a top Justice Department appellate lawyer on detail to the special counsel’s office. -law.com

Concord pleaded not guilty in May. Their attorney, Eric Dubelier – a partner at Reed Smith, has described the election meddling charges as “make believe,” arguing on Monday that Mueller’s indictment against Concord “doesn’t charge a crime.”

“There is no statute of interfering with an election. There just isn’t,” said Dubelier, who added that Mueller’s office alleged a “made-up crime to fit the facts they have.”

Dubelier added that the case against Concord Management is the first in US history “where anyone has ever been charged with defrauding the Justice Department” through their failure to register under FARA.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service