New Federal Bill Targets Patriot Groups and Citizen Militias as Domestic Terrorists: TPCC News

 This Includes NRA Members, Washington, DC — The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2018, introduced this month in the House, is making ‘patriot groups’ and citizen militias uneasy and for good reason. It is specifically targeting them.

As the bill’s summary notes, the purpose of the legislation is:


If you are country, or a redneck

If You Are A Christian

If You Believe In The Constitution

If You Believe in the 2nd Amendment

If You Believe in the NRA

If You Have Faith In God, this is the new bill to be passed into law, this is not my Government.

  Patriots are now deemed a Conspiracy Theory within Faith.

 This is not the Government under the Constitution for America.

To authorize dedicated domestic terrorism offices within the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity and require the Federal Government to take steps to prevent domestic terrorism.

 While on the surface this sounds like a rational idea, when we dig deeper into the bill, we discover just what they mean by “preventing domestic terrorism.”

 According to the FBI, the definition of a domestic terrorist is “individuals and/or groups inspired by or associated with primarily U.S.-based movements that espouse extremist ideologies of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.”

 The FBI notes the specific example of the two crazy individuals in Las Vegas who killed police officers in 2014,

–for example, the June 8, 2014 Las Vegas shooting, during which two police officers inside a restaurant were killed in an ambush-style attack, which was committed by a married couple who held anti-government views and who intended to use the shooting to start a revolution.

 The bill also associates these deranged murderers with the “patriot” label. However, what this bill fails to mention is that these supposed “patriot” movement domestic terrorists were actually banished from real patriot groups because they were on the police payroll and known to be provocateurs. 

 As the late Will Grigg wrote:

After the Millers murdered three people — Las Vegas Metro Officers Alyn Beck and Igor Soldo, and Joseph Wilcox, an armed citizen who heroically tried to stop their rampage — their former handlers claimed that they were unaware of the couple’s “anti-police sentiments.” That claim is difficult to credit, given that Jerad Miller had a lengthy criminal record, and the fact that the couple had made itself very prominent in protests associated with the Occupy Wall Street movement.

 But that is not all. The bill goes on further to credit the Southern Poverty Law Center—a group who makes hundreds of millions of dollars selling hate by labeling anyone they disagree with politically as a hate group.

According to the bill:

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, in 2015, for the first time in 5 years, the number of hate groups in the United States rose by 14 percent. The increase included a more than twofold rise in the number of Ku Klux Klan chapters. The number of anti-government militias and “patriot” groups also grew by 14 percent in 2015.

 Yes, the KKK and neo-Nazi groups are abhorrent and deal in hate, but the SPLC doesn’t just target these groups like they used to—thus the reason for the increase in “hate” and “extremist” groups.

 As Reason’s John Stossel pointed out recently, “SPLC once fought useful fights. They took on the Ku Klux Klan. But now they go after people on the right with whom they disagree.”

They are also making a killing while doing it.

Morris Dees, SPLC’s co-founder, promised to stop fundraising once his endowment hit $55 million. But when he reached $55 million, he upped the bar to $100 million, saying that would allow them “to cease costly fundraising.” But again, when they reached $100 million, they didn’t stop. Now they have $320 million—a large chunk of which is kept in offshore accounts. Really. It’s on their tax forms.

 What is particularly disturbing about the SPLC is the fact that they fail to make any mention of openly violent and hateful group whose been caught time and again laying waste to property and innocent people with whom they disagree.

As Stossel points out:

In return for those donations to SPLC, the world gets a group that now lists people like Ben Carson and Fox commentators Laura Ingraham, Judge Andrew Napolitano and Jeanine Pirro as extremists—but doesn’t list the leftist militant hate groups known as antifa.

Also, any mention of antifa is conveniently absent from this bill as well.

What’s more, as the bill points out:

In November 2017, the Federal Bureau of Investigation released its annual hate crime incident report, which found that in 2016, hate crimes increased by almost 5 percent, including a 19-percent rise in hate crimes against American Muslims. Similarly, the previous year’s report found that in 2015, hate crimes increased by 6 percent. Much of that increase came from a 66-percent rise in attacks on American Muslims. In both reports, race-based crimes were most numerous; more than 50 percent of those hate crimes targeted African Americans.

 This number is real. As TFTP reported last year, attacks against innocent Muslims have grown. However, the largest purveyor of hate against Muslims is the United States government. For nearly two decades, the US government has constantly fear mongered about Islamic terrorism and how they “hate our freedom.” But it was America’s foreign policy that has fostered the expansion terrorism—not to mention, fund it.

 This constant fear of a “brown bogeyman” coupled with rhetoric about refugees and travel bans has led to an environment in which hate is bred and the US government is the head cheerleader.

 The bottom line is that there are undoubtedly crazy people out there who are willing to kill for some cause they think they believe in. There have been horrific incidents of people snapping and killing citizens and police alike. However, it is not the millions of other people who identify as patriots nor the tens of thousands of militia groups that are doing this. Yes, there are hate groups who attack others and the government should prevent that, but lumping everyone in with these groups is not only dangerous but Orwellian.

 It is important to note that most people who question the State do so out of a desire to prevent death, not foster it. People who questioned the narrative of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq did so because they wanted to prevent a war in which many would die.

 However, they were labeled as kooks and conspiracy theorists by the establishment—despite being proven right years later.

This is nothing new.

 In fact, in spite having no real reason to go after ‘conspiracy theorists’ and ‘patriot groups’, the government has a long history of infiltrating groups and labeling those who question the status quo as a threat. It even has a name: PATCON, short for “Patriot Conspiracy.”

 Indeed, much of the police state which has risen up around the country is in response to the essentially non-existent threat from those who want to expose the crimes of the state who are labeled as extremist groups. YouTube and Google have even gotten in on the action and have moved to censor evidence of US war crimes and historical footage of war.

 A police sergeant in Morgan County, Indiana admitted in May of 2014 that his department had obtained an armored vehicle in part because of returning military veterans were deemed domestic terror threats by Homeland Security in 2009.

 In August of 2013, Concord, New Hampshire Police Chief John Duval secretly contacted Homeland Security and demanded an armored vehicle due to the alleged “threat” posed by peaceful libertarians.

 The MIAC Report, a federal training document famously presented to Missouri police in 2009, went as far as falsely tying supporters of former Presidential Candidate Ron Paul and the Constitution to “extremist groups” as well.

 In 2014, a sheriff’s deputy admitted on video that these weapons of war were needed to fend off “constitutionalists” with firearms.

 All this bill does is further these previous attacks against those who want peace and freedom and it does so by blurring the lines between real extremists and freedom-loving activists. After all, if tyrants can associate hate and extremism with the ideas of peace and liberty—the herd will be far easier to keep under control and will have no problem voting away their rights to fight this non-existent threat.

Views: 214

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Did the government wait for most vets to die off before compensating them?

Most of the veterans who marched on the Capitol in 1932 had been out of work since the Great Depression began in 1929. They needed money, and the World War Adjusted Compensation Act of 1924 had promised to give them some, but not until 1945 -- a full 27 years after the end of the war they had fought in.

You must consider what Roosevelt did in 1933 with his War Power Act and who he bailed out and with who's money. Just follow the money how much was the Gold he stole worth and to whom..


The National Guard is the organized Constitutional Malitia... it has been federalized and is no longer solely a State Militia. 

The federalization of the National Guard is the direct result of accepting federal aid for the arming, training, and organizing the Guard. As a resulted in the Federal Government has basically taken over what was once a totally State supported, organic militial... once, answering only to the Governor and State Legislature...

May I respond with the direct experiences of many guardsmen's.

There are two different principles at play here. There is a constitutional principle, based on the Supremacy Clause which states (basically) that when state and federal laws conflict, the federal law takes precedence.
The Governor of a state does not simply have the ability to issue orders to guardsmen at his leisure. He or She operates through the military chain of command, which starts at the state's Adjutant General (the senior national guard military officer of the state) and flows both down from there, and upwards through the National Guard Bureau and the operational parent commands of the specific NG unit.
These two underlying principles guide the types of statutory authority by which a commander may give orders to the National Guard.
If the orders that I receive are "Title 10" orders, i.e. they are issued pursuant to statutory authority under Title 10, United States Code (which governs the military), then we have been "federalized" under the reserve component authority of the U.S. military, and the federal authority prevails. This means the full range of federal law applies to us, including the Posse Comitatus act.
If the orders I receive are "Title 32" orders, i.e. they are issued pursuant to Title 32, United States Code (which governs the National Guard specifically), then I am on what's called "Full Time Guard Duty". This means that I am operating under state orders, but whose authority (and funding) are derived from Federal law. That means that once again, Federal law prevails even under Title 32 status. This was never really all that clear, so a few years ago the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, the bill that funds the military each year) was amended to explicitly designate certain National Guard commanders as having "dual status", meaning they are explicitly authorized to order guardsmen under both Title 10 and Title 32 status. An important distinction here is that in some cases, guardsmen under Title 32 orders are excepted from the Posse Comitatus act.
There is also purely "state active duty", where the authority, orders, funding, and operational limitations are purely derived from the Governor. The key part being "funding." Because there are no federal funds being offered for state active duty, it is typically used sparingly and for short periods of time.
I've been activated under all three statuses -- Title 10 for the war in Vietnam, Title 32 for riots in Baltimore and for hurricane relief and homeland security detail, and state active duty for lesser disaster relief efforts as EPA cleanup. In none of these cases was there an issue of conflicting orders from the governor..

Just saying and I don't believe we ever heard we were an organized Constitutional club of any type like the 3 percenters..

The National Guard has its origins in the Constitution... as the Constitutional Militia (2nd Amendment)... as to the rest of it ... your synopsis is on the mark.  I put it in simpler terms, by stating the States basically gave away their authority over the Guard, by taking federal money and equipment... Instead, of funding the State MIlitia on their own.

Again, most States have a Statutory Militia (lawfully authorized)... it is normally comprised of the National Guard, often refered to as the 'organized militia' by statute, with an inactive Guard and irregular militia (reserves) making up the full complament of militia available by state statute.

The Inactive Guard is normally manned by elligible reitred and discharged members of the organized militia (National Guard) who remain subject to recall. The irregular militia, when fully authorized, is manned by a voluntary civil militia... all males of military age..

The latter (irregular militia) is normally unfunded and unauthorized in most states....Albiet, the Governor, leglislature and AG, could act to bring the irregular militia online, with little expense to the state... it's all volunteer. 

The Irregular State Militia would not be subject to any federal intervention... It would serve the State alone. Its officers would be appointed by the State, and its training, equipping, and drill status, would be mandated by the Sate. Surplus military arms and equipment could be transfered to this Constitutional State Militia from the National Guard under current law.  Training doctrine, standards, and the arming of the indiviual militia members could be mandated by the State and become the responsibility of the individual to fund (as it was in colonial days)... less, training expenses.

 Things have been changed, they are no longer in charge.


Things can change again... the States need to reassert their Constitutional authority. They need to stop giving away their Constitutional powers.

They need to stand down.

So, all those surveys done by DOD asking the soldiers, airmen, sailors and marines if they will fire on US citizens was for naught... think again ... who is being replaced in the Military and by whom... or what?

The military is taking on illegal aliens over white US Citizens... they appear to be culling the christian's and conservatives... why?


Who controls the courts and do you actually believe that justice is blind... or that the courts manage the law, to advance the will of the oligarchy running the government. 

Since we have a fiat currency... do you actually believe the courts or the power behind them, care if your group receives a large dollar settlement from the Court... All that does is inflate the existing currency in circulation.  Wake up there is no just resolution posible thru the courts, not as currently comprised.

Even when you win... they win... silencing you with fiat currency... debt our children and grand children will have to pay.

Fiat currency, sounds very Federal Reserve, and very very Jewish from the Rothschild family...


The British do with their BAR enforcement.

Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court (Case 6:97-CR-51 )that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law. You won't believe that, I know this by now.

Remember, King George was allowed to be the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America."  (1783) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.' And it appears all titles and stature are passed on to the next set of Royals.

No they don't care about us and have told us we are the enemy. Again in their own words. Therefore we present their own words after all they wrote them and many into their laws (private ones). Laws Robert doesn't believe we have.

The government settles with a check, when you deposit it, it becomes a digital entry, nothing more or less. less than fiat currency. It is not real currency until you purchase something of value or need with it. This is why some demand remedy in land.

I can't help it that people won't come forward as a collective to make them losers as they should have been from the beginning of the founding of America.. I only do what I can and it works.

I pray we can do the same for our Veterans NCOs and the 9/11 First Responders and their surviving families. We need them is mass to step forward..

 Look man, we know all this, we have known for a long time. They even fabricated laws twisting it in legal legislation.

 First, and it is coming up, a media show down, dropping blogs forbidden by the EU.

 The Yellow Vest Protest in the EU, their are close 100 Million Underground Militia.

 Here in America, close to 1.6 Million and growing. You will not find them on YouTube, unless they contact us to release the video.

 Technology, is in our hands, time is own our side.




Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service