Never mind Wisconsin. California’s Presidential vote must be disqualified



In California illegal aliens are allowed to obtain driver’s licenses. Last year California passed a “motor voter” law.It stipulates that unless the applicant opts out, the applicant will automatically be added to the voter rolls. The potential for fraud
is yuuge.

Tens of thousands of dead people are on the voting roles, many still “receive” their permanent absentee ballot. Illegal aliens are on the roles—thanks to the Democrats all an illegal alien has to do is get a California drivers license and they can register to vote, almost automatically. Then it is up to the County Registrar of Voters and the Secretary of State to vet them to assure they can legally vote. The Election Integrity Project in Los Angeles gave the LA Registrar 49,000 names of dead people, those that have moved or illegal aliens—and seemingly nothing has been done with that information.

This is an affront to all real citizens and it violates Federal law:

The official number of illegal aliens in the state of California is nearly 3 million. We can estimate the number to be more than double this amount in reality.
Over half of all drivers license issued in California were given to individuals who are here illegally and the state automatically registers those with a driver’s license to vote.
In 2015, California Governor Jerry Brown (D-CA) signed a bill giving full voting rights to illegal aliens. This gives them the right to vote in all elections from a local level to national elections, including that of choosing who will become President.
The biggest problem with this is it is against Federal law for non-citizens to vote in any national election.

At least one study concludes that the 2008 election outcome was altered by illegal aliens voting:

In spite of substantial public controversy, very little reliable data exists concerning the frequency with which non-citizen immigrants participate in United States elections. Although such participation is a violation of election laws in most parts of the United States, enforcement depends principally on disclosure of citizenship status at the time of voter registration. This study examines participation rates by non-citizens using a nationally representative sample that includes non-citizen immigrants. We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections. Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.

The terminally left biased twits at, God love ’em, say hey,  there’s nothing to worry about because the law didn’t really grant illegals a right to vote:

read more:

Views: 993

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Unless California is recounted by hand and all of the illegal votes from non-citizens,dead people, etc., thrown out, the vote count as it stood on Nov 8, 2016 should be tossed aside. The Green Party, Democrats, and of course George Soros, shouldn't mind, after the hubbub over recounts is to guarantee the voting was done legally and lawfully nation wide! I say call them out on all this recount garbage!
I'm wondering if Hillary's "concussion 2012" has left her so brain damaged that she's forgotten that the only president she'll ever be is of her cell block in prison. Also, if she receives a pardon from Obama she'll basically be admitting guilt. If she's as smart as she thinks she is she'll buy an island somewhere in the world and live a quiet life. Her life of crime has finally caught up with her.
A hand recount will never happen in CA as long as governor Moore beam is in office. I still don't know why they ever elected him twice

They didn't... remember... it isn't the people casting the votes that count them... and count and count until they arrive at a predetermined outcome.

Yes, he did win. He won by more than ONE MILLION VOTES in both of his recent gubernatorial races.

Once again California proves it is a failed state. This liberal bastion is a dark spot in the United States. No wonder its economy is doing so poorly when liberals are running the show. When I hear "California" I just want to vomit.

Have you ever lived in California? It is a beautiful State with a lot of outdoor stuff to do. In parts ,depending on time of year, you can swim in the morning and go skiing in the afternoon. Tons of pheasants and other wildlife. Yes the Communists have ruined the State politically and in some cases the environment but it is well worth fighting for. No I don't live there but I did for 3 1/2 years. Great people in the small towns and foothill's but like NY it is run politically by the big cities. Those living outside the cities need to stand up and be counted. Save your beautiful State from oppression. God Bless and good luck.

This is PRECISELY why I, as a U.S. citizen and CA resident, refuse to vote.  To vote, in this state, is the equivalent of aiding and abetting the commission of a crime.  I phoned the LA County Voter Registrars Office on such questions regarding who is on our voter reg rolls, and was told that they do not vet the rolls, because "people register on penalty of perjury".  But if no one ever checks whether they HAVE committed perjury or not???  Nothing to do with them, I was told: If I want to change the law, I need to contact my Assemblyman or state Senator.  Who are both deep Democrats.  Elected by a fraudulent voting system.  Catch-22.  

I don't know why nobody is suing this state for its corruption in this matter.  (I'm on S.S., or I would.)  But if I were Trump, I would move to bar any votes from CA on federal elections until they CERTIFIABLY CLEAN THEIR VOTER  REG ROLLS, of all illegal aliens and other ineligible voters, dead voters, and duplicate/multiple voters, and REQUIRE PHOTO ID.  PERIOD.  END OF STORY.  And get rid of the hackable electronic voting machines while they are at it.  As it is, voting here is a scam and a sham, a fake and a fraud, a farce, a delusion, an illusion.  It is, simply, a crime, being enacted by this state's political prostitutes. 


Actually Stan election and voter fraud in Ca. is all the more reason you need to vote and too vote in every election ... especially, local and State Elections  If enough citizens voted no number of illegal aliens would be able to over turn their collective power to reform government... however, individual who are discouraged and don't vote fall victim to exactly what the Democrats want... hopelessness which breeds failure and bondage.

Absolutely right. There are millions of people who live in the foothills and out in the country that don't vote. As the Col. says they want you feeling helpless. So do the opposite. Vote in every election and get as many family and friends to vote. It wasn't all that long ago California was a red State. If getting out to vote isn't enough, become a conservative activist. Promote patriots for local office and work your way up. Whatever you do , don't give up. God Bless and stay strong in your beliefs.


Leave the measures put forth in the constitution intact. The Left's desire to change/do away with parts of, eventually do away completely with the constitution is wrong and should be fought against whenever they pose any changes to it. Pop a cap in it!




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service