Never mind Wisconsin. California’s Presidential vote must be disqualified



In California illegal aliens are allowed to obtain driver’s licenses. Last year California passed a “motor voter” law.It stipulates that unless the applicant opts out, the applicant will automatically be added to the voter rolls. The potential for fraud
is yuuge.

Tens of thousands of dead people are on the voting roles, many still “receive” their permanent absentee ballot. Illegal aliens are on the roles—thanks to the Democrats all an illegal alien has to do is get a California drivers license and they can register to vote, almost automatically. Then it is up to the County Registrar of Voters and the Secretary of State to vet them to assure they can legally vote. The Election Integrity Project in Los Angeles gave the LA Registrar 49,000 names of dead people, those that have moved or illegal aliens—and seemingly nothing has been done with that information.

This is an affront to all real citizens and it violates Federal law:

The official number of illegal aliens in the state of California is nearly 3 million. We can estimate the number to be more than double this amount in reality.
Over half of all drivers license issued in California were given to individuals who are here illegally and the state automatically registers those with a driver’s license to vote.
In 2015, California Governor Jerry Brown (D-CA) signed a bill giving full voting rights to illegal aliens. This gives them the right to vote in all elections from a local level to national elections, including that of choosing who will become President.
The biggest problem with this is it is against Federal law for non-citizens to vote in any national election.

At least one study concludes that the 2008 election outcome was altered by illegal aliens voting:

In spite of substantial public controversy, very little reliable data exists concerning the frequency with which non-citizen immigrants participate in United States elections. Although such participation is a violation of election laws in most parts of the United States, enforcement depends principally on disclosure of citizenship status at the time of voter registration. This study examines participation rates by non-citizens using a nationally representative sample that includes non-citizen immigrants. We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections. Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.

The terminally left biased twits at, God love ’em, say hey,  there’s nothing to worry about because the law didn’t really grant illegals a right to vote:

read more:

Views: 993

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

If ever the United States needed to give itself an enema, California would be the place they would insert the tube.  Morally, ethically and financially bankrupt, and yet they seem to think the good fairy godmother will arrive and make it all better.  As a Socialist satellite state where 65% of the population receives some form of government aid, with the remaining  35% footing the bill, is that sustainable?  The latest farcical tax and spend plan is the effort to combat global warming by attacking the farming industry and Dairy farmers for the methane produced by cows and their manure.  How?  With new environmental taxes to provide the needed funding to monitor and regulate the cows!  

There is much Trump can do to disrupt the liberal progressive democrat machine 's plan of obstructionism BUT the Trump idea is to cram as much life giving blood into our nation in the 4 years he will have in our White House.
The opposition you can bet already has 4 years worth of democrat bullshit planned with a reactionary political army prepared to stop Trump on EVERY initiative.
Our plan has to be to misdirect the liberal progressive democrat machine whenever wherever we can.
We're not used to doing that.
We GOTTA learn!

This is where the recount should have gone. I find it quite duplicitous of the green party to say they wanted recounts in other states where they have no evidence of fraud while California with their efforts to hand out drivers licenses to any non citizen gives a glaring red flag of potential fraud. Stein points to California and these red flags, but wants the recount in the states that went to Trump. This fact alone should disqualify any approval for a recount.   

In order to obtain a drivers license, one must produce a valid birth certificate!

The license does not state nationality. At least it didn't when I was there.

Daaa... I said this win Govern Brown passed the bill. Real Stupidity in action. But it went through unnoticed. And we all wonder why are State is going to hell and a hand basket.... People vote in crocks and criminals into office and they expect to get a fair shake. NOT!!! I am a Californian and I believe there is a huge swamp to be drained on this side of the Country. I we want to get our country back we need to get our State back...

California is the 10th or was the 10th largest economic power in the world. This means a lot to our Country and we are allowing this State to be more and more corrupt year by year....

Wake up Californians it is time to take this State back....

Looks like Republicans are afraid to come to California. We couldn't even find one Republican to take Boxers place. Remember this..."if it will work in California, it will work in the rest of the U.S." I don't remember which politician said that.... but you can believe it was a democrat. Lets all work to get California back to becoming a patriotic state instead of a porthole for socialists.

The California dl's CLEARLY state that the document t given to illegals CANNOT be used for voter id.

No one is watching the hen house. That is the problem. I work for election in Northern California and vote ID's are not verified. So voter fraud could be out of control and no one will know the difference. They have a California ID they get a vote by mail notice in the mail and they are a registered voter.

The words do not equal the reality.... Do not be fooled...

Wow. Why am I not surprised?

Yes, by all means...let's bring all of these criminal activities to the light.

Yes, the feds should go into Cali and do an extensive search as what's going on out there. Every vote cast should be looked into, investigated. When they come across an illegal they should be shipped out. The tax payers of that radical communist state should be taxed to pay for the needed investigation. Anyone resisting, pop a cap in them rather than pamper them so not to waste time. How does that grab ya u Leftist?




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service