Nationalism The Rise of of Men WW3 @bitchute.com. When you allow bankers to write history, and find a lie or images, I do dare to show what it is.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JQJzUndnY7p2/

  The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government in 1917 during World War I announcing support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population.

 The Balfour Declaration was a lie... we collected all the documents.

Views: 256

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 Double down, nice...:)-

 It will be unsettling to others, causing anxiety or uneasiness; disturbing, a political lie of the past.

Like all things political, one must weight the total of the evidence... which clearly favors the conclusion that the Balfour Declaration of 1917 established British support at the highest levels for the establishment of a Jewish Home Land in Palestine.

The Balfour Declaration, (November 2, 1917), is a statement of British support for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.” It was made in a letter from Arthur James Balfour, the British foreign secretary, to Lionel Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild (of Tring), a leader of British Jewry.

The declaration had many long-lasting consequences. It greatly increased popular support for Zionism within Jewish communities worldwide, and became a core component of the British Mandate for Palestine, the founding document of Mandatory Palestine, which later became Israel and the Palestinian territories.

As a result, it is considered a principal cause of the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict, often described as the world's most intractable conflict. Controversy remains over a number of areas, such as whether the declaration contradicted earlier promises the British made to the Sharif of Mecca in the McMahon–Hussein correspondence.

The Balfour Declaration was endorsed by the principal Allied powers and was included in the British mandate over Palestine, formally approved by the newly created League of Nations on July 24, 1922.

In May 1939 the British government altered its policy in a White Paper recommending a limit of 75,000 further immigrants and an end to immigration by 1944, unless the resident Palestinian Arabs of the region consented to further immigration. Zionists condemned the new policy, accusing Britain of favoring the Arabs. This point was made moot by the outbreak of World War II (1939–45) and the founding of the State of Israel in 1948.  It remains in debate... but moot as far as those who have recognized Israel as sovereign. 

For More See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

Balfour Declaration | United Kingdom [1917] | Britannica.com
https://www.britannica.com/event/Balfour-Declaration

 Should we reflect on comments.

 No nation has the right to give away the rights of a nation or of a people. Palestine was not established by the Empire. Palestine is not Israel, Israel was established by God, through Moses, then the sodomites of the Royal Family. Inbreed, to maintain a culture.

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim made some impressionable, statements, but he did not tell all the truth.

 Nelson who is family of, Yisrael Hasson?

Yisrael Hasson Yisrael Hasson... is an Israeli politician and former Deputy Director of Shin Bet . He served as a member of the Knesset for Yisrael Beiteinu and Kadima between 2006 and 2014, before becoming Chairman of the Israel Antiquities Authority

.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shin_Bet

Israel Security Agency
שירות הביטחון הכללי
Sherut haBitaẖon haKlali, General Security Service
جهاز الأمن العام

www.shabak.gov.il

The Israel Security Agency (ISA, Hebrew: שֵׁירוּת הַבִּיטָּחוֹן הַכְּלָלִי Sherut ha-Bitaẖon haKlali "the General Security Service"; Arabic: جهاز الأمن العام‎), better known by the acronym Shabak (Hebrew: שב״כ, IPA: [ʃaˈbak] (listen), Arabic: شاباك‎) or the Shin Bet (a two-letter Hebrew abbreviation of "Security Service"), is Israel's internal security service. Its motto is "Magen veLo Yera'e" (מָגֵן וְלֹא יֵרָאֶה, lit. "Defender that shall not be seen" or "The unseen shield").

Shin Bet is one of three principal organizations of the Israeli intelligence community, alongside Aman (military intelligence) and the Mossad (foreign intelligence service).

You left what his family is, Syriana Muslim, to define the full inception of what he is Hebrew Muslim, clearly stated by many, there is no such thing as Muslim Jews.

He is a Hebrew of Syrian birth... not a Muslim.  He identifies as Jewish.

 No, his family is Muslim, all are intentionally connected to Shia Islam, Sunni jihadist Islam of the Saudis. And Mossad, with the Rothschild banking in Israel, and Soros.

 You are truly deceptive in comment, I would love to stay and talk, but your education is fundamentally flawed, in favor of.

So, the former Deputy Director of the Israel Security Agency... 'The unseen Shield' is a Muslim.  Somehow I find that very difficult to believe... nay, impossible to believe.

Hasson was born in Syria a Hebrew by birth and blood...He made his Aliyah (repatriation) with Israel, as part of the diaspora, in 1962... at the age of 7.  You may want to do better research... start by throwing away that Book you talk about... the one with the KKK doctrine.

https://howlingpixel.com/i-en/Yisrael_Hasson

https://howlingpixel.com/i-en/Aliyah

 Try that with someone else.

You really use the elite media well.

Any recommendations... Tiff maybe... or Hank... No, not Hank he is stuck on laugh mode.

 Took some time, but the letter from my family in Israel did come back, Yisrael Hasson is a Turkish Jewish Talmudist. Hasan family, an active Bangladeshi family.

He is a EU Khazar.Both Arabic Muslim and Jewish.

I will read through the letter.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service