Nancy Pelosi Could Soon Be The Speaker Of The House, And That Should Freak You Out

Are you ready for the second coming of Speaker Pelosi? As a result of the recent Obamacare debacle, the American people are deeply frustrated with the Republicans in Congress. And having nowhere else to go, many voters are considering turning to the Democrats for answers. As you will see below, one recent survey found that only 37 percent of voters nationally say that they plan to support Republican candidates for Congress in 2018. If the 2018 mid-term elections were held at this moment, the Republicans would be in big trouble and it would be quite likely that the Democrats would take back control of the U.S. House of Representatives.

And I am not the only one that is warning of political doom on the horizon. Earlier today, an editorial by Newt Gingrich and Brad Anderson also warned of what could happen if the Republicans don’t get their act together…

Following Republicans’ failure to fix the country’s health care system, polls show Americans are increasingly flirting with Democratic governance in Congress next year. This means Republicans must change their game plan. The next six months must not be the same as the last six months.

To regain their legislative momentum and keep their majority, Republicans must clearly demonstrate they are fighting for the country’s hardworking taxpayers. This means passing a major tax cut by Thanksgiving — and making it retroactive to the start of this year.

I am not particularly optimistic that we will see major tax cuts by the end of this year, but hopefully I will be proven wrong.

If the Republicans in Congress continue to fumble the ball, we could see a historic wipeout in 2018. As I mentioned above, the polling numbers don’t look good for congressional Republicans at this point…

Democrats stand to win big in the 2018 midterm elections, according to a new poll – perhaps flipping enough seats to take over the House of Representatives.

Forty-four percent of registered voters say they would vote for a Democrat in their district if an election were held today. Just 37 percent said they would back a Republican.

And even in the best of times, this upcoming election would provide quite a challenge for the Republican Party. Larry Sabato of the University of Virginia recently explained why

Midterm elections for first-term presidents are historically ruinous for the party that controls the White House.

By Sabato’s analysis, the president’s party has shed House seats in 36 of 39 midterms stretching back more than 150 years, with an average loss of 33 seats — well above the 24 pickups the Democrats need to take the chamber next year.

If something happens 36 out of 39 times, there is a very good chance that it will happen the next time too.

So even if President Trump was exceedingly popular right now the Republican Party would have an uphill climb in 2018. But the fact that his approval ratings have fallen so precipitously definitely spells trouble…

President Donald Trump has watched his ratings decline for months, but on Wednesday two respected polls showed that only a third of American voters view him favorably — a new low less than 200 days into his presidency

A new Quinnipiac University Poll has the president’s approval rating falling to 33 percent, while Gallup shows it at 36 percent. Quinnipiac’s measurement is the lowest in the poll’s tracking of the Trump administration thus far, and Gallup’s is the lowest three-day average it has registered.

I fully support President Trump, but I have to admit that those are horrible numbers. Of course the mainstream media is treating him exceedingly unfairly, and that takes a toll. But hopefully he can eventually overcome the constant media onslaught and regain the level of popularity that he enjoyed back during the campaign.

If you dig even deeper into the Quinnipiac poll, you find some numbers about Trump that are deeply, deeply alarming

  • 54% said they were embarrassed to have him as president
  • 57% said they he was abusing the powers of his office
  • 60% said they believed he was above the law
  • 71% said Trump was not levelheaded
  • 62% said Trump was not honest
  • 63% said Trump did not have good leadership skills
  • 59% said he did not care about average Americans
  • 63% said he did not share their values

President Trump cannot fight this battle alone. So many conservatives out there decided that their job was done once Trump won the election, but the truth is that the battle is just getting started.

Right now, Democrats are raising millions upon millions of dollars for the mid-term elections and the liberal base is extremely energized.

If we do not match their enthusiasm and energy we are going to be facing a historic defeat.

And if the Democrats are able to take control of both the Senate and the House in 2018, it will just be a matter of time before Trump is impeached.

We desperately need to get Trump more friends in Congress, and so I am hoping that you all will stand with me and other pro-Trump candidates that are running for federal offices in 2018. In my new book entitled “Living A Life That Really Matters”, I explain what I hope to do once I am elected, and one of the things I hope to do is to put an end to the ridiculous investigations that are keeping Trump from being an effective president.

We have a once in a generation opportunity to fundamentally change the direction of this country, but if the Democrats take back control of Congress in 2018 that door will be slammed shut.

So hopefully we can get conservatives to awaken out of their slumber, because if nothing dramatically changes between now and the 2018 mid-term elections, the Democrats will likely win a huge victory and Nancy Pelosi will likely once again become the Speaker of the House.

Image result for God help us

Views: 52

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

as hard is it is to fathom it might be able to be even worse ;

 Dem activist vows Maxine Waters will be next House speaker

my 2¢ = given Rs aren't in the least interested in the concept of REPEAL by it's actual meaning or restoring constitutional integrity to fed/gov --  " What difference at this point does it make?"

...probably lesser of the two evils,.....but not by much.

OMG.........the dimwit who must have dementia?  When she talks about Trump she keeps calling him Bush, and when she talks about Mike Pence she calls him Putin.  She doesn't even know which end her brains are in....

Related image

The GOP had better inform the Public that it was the DEMOCRATS that gave them Obama Care... not one single vote came from the Republicans. The Democrats own the ACA and they are the ones keeping it from being repealed.

It is the Democrats that are blocking a clean repeal of Obama Care... Not one Democrat voted to repeal or replace, Obama care.  If two Democrats had voted to repeal this last vote... it would have passed.  But we know not one Democrat voted to repeal Obama Care.  The Democrats are obstructing the repeal of the ACA.  

So, who's at fault here?  the GOP?  Some one is smoking something and it isn't legal... Only, the MSM could get something so twisted up and turned upside down.  If the Democrats gave us the ACA and they will not vote to repeal or replace it ... and 95% of the GOP is willing to repeal... whose at fault?  The GOP? Only the insane would come to that conclusion.

correct me if I'm wrong Col.  -- but wasn't the 'repeal' vote you're referring to the bastardized definition of repeal? if so, that wasn't a vote to repeal. it was a vote to give the Rs two more years to pass their own fed/gov ruled healthcare system. Two more years to continue being inept and continue using healthcare as their primary campaign narrative.

as far as I understand there hasn't been a vote for the actual meaning of repeal since obie was sure to not sign it. The deception of calling what was recently voted on a 'repeal' is indeed the Rs' doings, and so is their refusal to even allow an actual repeal bill to come to a vote.

it ain't all the Ds doings at all

I don't actually know what was in the final bill to 'repeal'... I thought it repealed all of the ACA possible in one bill...  seems that there are other places in the law that harbor portions of the ACA.. .making a clean repeal difficult if not impossible.  The idea was to repeal as much as possible and then provide for a 2yr phase in of the repeal while Congress acted to find other means to help Americans obtain health care...

In any event, the Dem's own the ACA and they also own the defeat of the GOP's efforts to repeal it.  One can not blame the GOP for 3 RINO's failing to vote for the repeal, when not one Democrat voted to repeal.

it just wasn't a repeal bill at all;

repeals (third person present) · repealed (past tense) · repealed (past participle) · repealing (present participle)
  1. revoke or annul (a law or congressional act):
    "the legislation was repealed five months later"
    synonyms: revoke · rescind · cancel · reverse · annul · nullify ·
    declare null and void · quash · abolish · vacate · abrogate · recall
    antonyms: enact
repeals (plural noun)
  1. the action of revoking or annulling a law or congressional act:
    "the House voted in favor of repeal"
    synonyms: revocation · rescinding · cancellation · reversal · annulment ·

what they were doing doesn't come close to that definition.
and I don't buy that 'impossible' crap at all. it's claiming that politics as it is now is more reality than reality itself. Justifying continuing the healthcare narrative that has profited R party tremendously for the past 8 years.


I don't buy it either...  

I believe a single bill to repeal is possible... what I attempted to do was explain how the GOP leadership presented the bill as a repeal... phased in ... repealing as much as they claimed was possible in a single bill.

Again, I agree with you... none of the bills were clean repeals.  I also don't buy into the argument that it will take several bills to repeal all of the ACA... One bill can cover it all.  The Bastards are simply LYING thru their eye teeth... and we all know it... or should know it.

;' /   I thought so..  and wondered why you were contradicting what I thought you thought

another Poe's Law moment -- I guess it's inevitable to happen occasionally

Poe's law

Poe's law is an Internet adage which states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, parodies of extreme views will be mistaken by some readers or viewers for sincere expressions of the parodied views.



Political Cartoons by Glenn McCoy

Tea Party
Facebook & Twitter


‘WikiLeaks Can’t Protect Their Sources’
Is The CIA About To Reveal Names Of DNC Leakers

Image result for Julian Assange

The saga surrounding who leaked sensitive DNC documents to WikiLeaks may take an interesting turn, hints former CIA officer Fred Rustmann.

WND reports:

The Central Intelligence Agency knows the identities of the people who leaked DNC emails to the whistleblower organization WikiLeaks during the heat of the 2016 presidential campaign, a former CIA officer contends.

Fred Rustmann, who served as an operations officer in the CIA’s National Clandestine Service for 24 years and was a member of the agency’s elite Senior Intelligence Service, said in an interview with WND that WikiLeaks’ ongoing release of classified information is “disgusting.” 

“WikiLeaks says they want to protect their sources – Julian Assange said that he wouldn’t reveal his sources, but he would say that it wasn’t the Russians,” Rustmann said. “But the agency knows a lot of the information. I suspect they may have a pretty good idea of who provided that information to WikiLeaks.”

Rustmann’s comments raise questions about potential plans for the CIA to reveal the names of those who allegedly leaked DNC documents to WikiLeaks.

Recently, the CIA made a veiled threat to WikiLeaks in respect to protecting their sources.

“WikiLeaks may think they are protecting those who provide them with classified information & other secrets, but they should not be certain of that,” the CIA statement said. 

In a statement to WND, Robert L. Deitz, a former advisor to CIA head Michael Hayden, called the threat “unprecedented.”

“It’s pretty unusual for the CIA to make a threat to WikiLeaks so publicly. It’s pretty unprecedented; one ought to be skeptical about this. That is not the way that CIA officials should operate,” Deitz said.

“This is the kind of thing, if somebody were to make this kind of threat it would come out of a different organization, DOD, State or maybe the White House. Traditionally it would certainly not come out of the CIA,” Deitz added.

WikiLeaks is in the news after both CNN and CBS falsely reported the group granted Donald Trump Jr. access to future leaks.

However, WikiLeaks had tweeted a link to the information days before the email reached Trump Jr.’s inbox. The fake news media claim this was stone cold proof of collusion, as WikiLeaks has long been smeared as a Kremlin puppet.


© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service