U.S. civil rights advocates aired their concerns about the recent Michael Brown shooting to the United Nations in Geneva, according to a press call from the organizations on Wednesday.

“This issue was front and center,” Hilary O. Shelton, director of the NAACP Washington Bureau, explained during the call.

According to Shelton, Trayvon Martin’s mother Sabrina Fulton and Jordan Davis’s father Ron Davis told their stories about losing their teenage children in shootings in each of the pre-briefings of the process.

“I think that everyone was outraged and horrified to hear that, yet again, it had happened in St. Louis, Missouri,” he said.

The group of activists presented to a U.N. panel in Geneva, Switzerland, documenting their concerns of U.S. compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) treaty.

read more:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/08/13/NAACP-Michael-Br...

The Treaty, which was signed by the US in 1966 and ratified by the Senatin 1994:

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx

Views: 616

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I do know that is true . I was there . and they did not bother me . because I had my 12 gage pump standing up so it could be seen and boxes of amo on the dash . that crowd just opened up and let me through. me and my old brown pick up. with 19 inch tires. I went in and retrieved my wife from her job and we went home.Crazy ,? maybe but I did get my wife out of harms way and no P T C

While my deepest sympathies go out to Mr. Martin's family and Mr. Browns I must say I disagree with this action. 

I DO NOT support or acknowledge the existence of the UN.  Without U.S. infused money, the UN would fall.  The UN is also supported by the likes of Soros and the ultra rich who's Pollyanna view of life is more dangerous than the common person on the street knows.  If the US ratifies a UN agreement, it will override our Constitution and open the door for the UN to strip the 2nd Amendment and the UN would tell us how we are allowed to have guns. 

This matter, Martin/Brown, hopefully is being investigated by Officers who still understand to "Protect and Serve". 

false flag diversion at any cost, they want Marshall Law, everytime that fraud takes a vacation he makes sure he is far away all the actors in place, the Black Panthers  were there the pimp Al was there think, its getting to hot for that fraud so they will do anything to create a diversion, do you ya wana make a bet

You're 100% correct.

The NAACP has no honorable leadership now and basically are a Soros One World Order group. They do not support the black American or blacks around the world. They have become money dogs as the Marxist Democrats in our Senate! They have become, like all Soros defectives, anti-freedom all over the world!

did you see when the protesters went to the diamond districk to protest the Jews, they came out in droves overwhelmed the useful idiots and the ran fast, Mike you got that right we need to call eachother here on face books and phone numbers and strat making it clear enough is enough they are onlky 17% of the people in the US, so its about time we shut down our stores and leave work and make a statement, SHOUT OUT WERE MAD AS HELL AND WERE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE AND WE DON'T HAVE TO BE PAID TOI CARE FOR OUR COUNTRY BELIEVE ME THEY WILL BE SCARED AMEN!

Agreed, the U.N. has NO jurisdiction in the U.S. or U.S. Laws.  They are an Outsider Organization and CANNOT comment nor institute decrees in the U.S.  And, we are NOT a war-torn Nation where they can step in.  This is a Domestic affair and not an International query.

ALSO...

This WAS NOT a Racial incident. It was a person whom had NO RESPECT for the Law, and no respect for people whom jobs are to uphold the peace.

Just like the Trayvon-Martin case, the MSM, Democrats, the NAACP (Democrats) Black Panther and other groups want to make it Racial so they can get other illegal and unConstitional Laws passed.  They, like Obama, want to get rid of the document that guarantees Freedom and Liberty for Everyone in the U.S. who ARE "LAW ABIDING, LEGAL CITIZENS" of this Country no matter their ancestor's heritage and/or ethnic background.

You NEVER see the MSM report on Black people killing their own or innocent White People.  It only makes news IF it is a Black Sociopath whom gets killed either by someone presumed white, or if it involves Police trying to do their sworn duties..

And, have you ever notice:  Whenever there is a shooting or accidental killing of a supposedly "innocent" black person, the Leaders and Organizers of the Protest ALWAYS involve Looting and Burning the businesses and homes of people not even associated or involved with the incident.

Why is the Black Mentality always on Looting & Burning?  Is it because our Washington D.C. Elected Official are always giving them free money they (the Black Panthers and other leaders) think Looting is Part of the parcel of "Free Government Money?"

I remember the 1960's when Johnson (then Nixon) was in office this same type of Mental Attitude was encouraged by people like Farrakhan (a fake Muslim Imam) and other Low Life's with more mouth than Rational Thought.

Worse part, the Black Communities are only Hurting themselves by looting and burning.  It makes them look like the Animals they [the Black Communities] claim White think they are.  If they are making the image they are savages, then how can they expect "Civilized" People to take them seriously?

When the Black Communities and Leaders are always shouting Hate Messages, how do the Black Communities expect anyone to take them as Civilized People if they are acting Uncivilized?

I wish the Black Communities could see that their so-called leaders are only leading them down a path of hatred, destruction and injustice by instigating hate and rioting.  That these Leaders are really out for only THEIR own Self-interent and NOT for the Black Communities.

Remember, Martin Luther King Jr protested PEACEFULLY without the Rioting, Looting and Burning.  MLK Jr even said these acts would only hurt the black community.  I remember some of his speeches as my parents watched the news during his speeches.

Racism in the U.S. was at its lowest in the last 20 years until the Sitting President reignited the embers of hatred and fanned the flames of Racism by speaking out of turn before a complete investigation of the Trayvon-Martin could be fully performed.

Does NOT the Black Communities understand Obama wants Racism to be alive in the U.S. so he can call Martial Law?  Does NOT the Black Communities and the Leaders (like Sharpton and the Black Panthers) goal is to help Obama to achieve this goal?

I have many friends whom are black, but we never look at skin color.  We are friends because we are people who like the same type of discussions and other ideology of similar mind.  We transcend the borders which Our Political Leaders try to enforce on us.

Remember: Obama IS half White AND never grew up in the Projects, Ghettos or Inner Cities of the U.S.  So, he really doesn't know or understand the Black Community as he grew up in White Neighborhoods and in Muslim controlled Countries.  Which is why his ideology is Socialism and not American!

too bad the city of Chicago was left out.........everyone wants to blame the white people for everybodys problems in the united states and around the world. here in this country we have the black culture that has become dependent on the governments handouts...and does not want to take any responsibility for their actions. when young black men keep fathering children and take no responsibility for their actions...blaiming that on the white culture of priviledge does not work. Detroit was not a white man's fault..it was the fault of a democrat run city for over 60 years, that was corrupt and eventually ran the whites out of the city...and what is left is the results of year after year of those people voting for the same democrat party, and not willing to take responsibility for their problems.....it is so much easier to blame someone else on your problems...than face the truth in the mirror. in ferguson...many, many years ago it was a predominately white area...so the blacks started moving in from the cities, and brought the crime, the welfare and all of the problems....so the whites moved out...and what is left is ferguson today.....the blacks should spend more time on cleaning up their own lifestyle than blaiming others for their problems.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service