MUSLIMS SLAUGHTER 12 IN PARIS: A ‘Revenge Attack’ Over Mohammed Cartoons

Over a frickin’ cartoon? The Religion of the Touchy.  Lock-n-Load, folks.

Twelve people were killed today when gunmen carried out a ‘massacre’ at the offices of a notoriously anti-Islamist magazine in Paris – including a police officer who was executed as he begged for mercy on the pavement.

Two masked attackers brandishing Kalashnikovs burst into the Charlie Hebdo headquarters, opening fire on staff after seeking out journalists by name.

Those executed also included four of the most famous cartoonists in France – men who had regularly satirised Islam and the Prophet Mohammed – along with the magazine’s editor-in-chief, Stephane Charbonnier.

The rest of the article below:

http://clashdaily.com/2015/01/muslims-slaughter-12-paris-revenge-at...

Views: 603

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Damn right. France would quietly go along with what the muslims call a rape jihadi  to save their paris. My family's men fought in WII and they made no secret of the way they felt about McAurther  in the Pacfic  and france in the Atlantic theador of war. We all know france will lay down for anything. Makes me sad. And England and the countries she holds are just as bad. There is no fight left in them.

Speaking of the French, Jacques Attali, big French guy in the U.N. writes a book called

"Millennium; Winners and Losers in the Coming Order"

http://www.amazon.com/Millennium-Winners-Losers-Coming-Order/dp/081...

In the book, he says that eventually the United States would become Spanish speaking. Why does some French guy in 1992 know what's happening in the U.S. more than most Americans do in 2014? Because it's not an accident, it's a long term goal and letting us in on it would be counter-productive.

"It will avail nothing to discuss in detail the League (of Nations) Covenant which was conceived for world super-government. In this existing League of Nations World Government with it's superpowers, this Republic will have no part." ~ President Warren G. Harding, 1920

No thanks,  I'm driving that day... lol.

Well, at least the majority of the world's Muslims - the so-called "moderate Muslims - once again spoke out in overwhelming outrage and opposition to this sick incident.

Oh, wait, ... my mistake!  All that the world heard from the "moderate Muslims" in response to yet another act of horrific violence against those who recognize Islam as the satanic cult that it really is was the sound of crickets, yet again.

Just proves once again that the anti-Christian left's fantasy "moderate Muslim" community does not exist at all, and that the majority of Muslims endorse these kinds of violent terrorist crimes against humanity, all in the name of their twisted "Religion of Peace".  If not, we would of heard differently by now.

there is only one step from endorsing this stuff to doing it. you realize that with no other soulition we will have to go to civil war and kill almost 10 million people just to save our own lives? they think we are kidding. we will fight harder for our country and lives than they will to push a pedophile's dream.be warned islam.  Obama won't be able to save himself, much less his muslim brothers.

Agree.  Hopefully it won't take much more of this type of terrorism to trigger the American majority into taking whatever action is necessary, political or otherwise, to rid ourselves of such evil forces, and a good number of anti-American progressives are going to get a taste of that medicine too.

Alice, I am in total agreement with you.

The other side of the coin is that there are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world. If they were all terrorists as the NWO propagandists would lead you to believe, we'd hear a lot more about it. It was a psychologial mechanism to get you to relinquish your rights, worldwide actually.

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” (David Rockefeller, Statement to the United Nations Business Council, September 23, 1994.

http://www.ourrepubliconline.com/Author/49

"In the years to come, as the project began rising over the skyline of Lower Manhattan, New Yorkers would give the immense twin towers a knowing nickname: David and Nelson."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/biography/newyo...

11 months before 9/11, Nicholas Rockefeller tells Aaron Russo about it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gwcQjDhZtI

Whooph!

It's that "tolerant" peace loving muslim religion again! This time Paris, this time only 12 . . .

Where next, how many?

AS BARACK "INSANE" OBASTARD, FLOODS AMERICA WITH MORE MUSLIMS, EVENTUALLY THIS WILL BE A NORMAL, EVERYDAY EVENT IN AMERICA AS WELL !!!!!.......TELL ME AGAIN THAT "ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE " !!!!!??????....LMAO...LMAO....

Obama's friends out having fun again.

Well I'm going to target Muslims in AMERICA.I won't kill but no knees will do when I shout GOD BLESS AMERICA.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

Breaking — West Virginia Lawmakers Invite Persecuted Pro-Second Amendment Counties In Virginia To Join Their State

West Virginia lawmakers introduced legislation to invite persecuted pro Second Amendment Counties to join their state.

The West Virginia Senate adopted a resolution to remind Virginia residents from Frederick County that they have a standing invite — from 1862 — to become part of West Virginia.

West Virginia freedom fighters broke away from Virginia Democrat slave owners during the Civil War.

This week West Virginia has once again invited persecuted Virginia pro 2-A counties to come join their state.

Sounds like a winning plan!

Resolution 8 reads as follows:

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 8

(By Delegates Howell, Summers, Shott, Householder, C. Martin, Hott, Graves, Cadle, Barnhart, J. Jeffries, Maynard, Phillips, Foster, Hamrick, Steele, D. Jeffries, Wilson, Waxman, Bartlett, Paynter, Linville, Sypolt, Bibby, Hill, Ellington, Higginbotham, J. Kelly, Mandt, Pack, Dean and P. Martin)

[Introduced January 14, 2020]

Providing for an election to be had, pending approval of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a majority of qualified citizens voting upon the proposition prior to August 1, 2020, for the admission of certain counties and independent cities of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the State of West Virginia as constituent counties, under the provisions of Article VI, Section 11 of the Constitution of West Virginia

Whereas, The Legislature of West Virginia finds that in 1863, due to longstanding perceived attitudes of neglect for the interests of the citizens of Western Virginia, and a studied failure to address the differences which had grown between the counties of Western Virginia and the government at Richmond, the Commonwealth of Virginia was irretrievably divided, and the new State of West Virginia was formed; and

Whereas, Such division occurred as the Trans-Allegheny portions of Virginia perceived that they suffered under an inequitable measure of taxation by which they bore a disproportionate share of the tax burden; and

Whereas, That this perception was further compounded by the effects of a scheme of representation by which Trans-Allegheny Virginia was not allowed to have its proper and equitable share of representation in the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, That this arrangement arguably resulted in the tax dollars of Trans-Allegheny Virginia being used to enrich the Tidewater through internal improvements which did not benefit the people of Western Virginia, while the people of the Trans-Allegheny had little to no say in how their tax dollars were allocated; and

Whereas, Though this course led to an irreconcilable division, and the subsequent formation of West Virginia, yet, the longstanding peaceful cooperation between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia is a sign that such separation, undertaken even under the most challenging and onerous of circumstances, can, with the passage of time, yield lasting results which are beneficial to both sides; and

Whereas, In the intervening years, the same neglect for the interests of many of the remaining counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia has allegedly been evidenced by the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, Particularly, many citizens of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont contend that an inequitable measure of taxation exists by which they bear a disproportionate share of the present tax burden of the Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont also believe that, currently, a scheme of representation exists by which the citizens of Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont do not have a proper share of representation in the government at Richmond; and, consequently

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont believe that their tax dollars are used to enrich the Tidewater and Northern Virginia through internal improvements which do not benefit the people of these other parts of Virginia, while the people of these other parts of Virginia have little to no say in how their tax dollars are allocated; and

Whereas, In recent days, these tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the government at Richmond for the differences in certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, In the latest, and most evident, in this string of grievances, the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The Legislative body of West Virginia believes that this latest action defies the wise counsel which has come down to us in the august words of our common Virginia Founders: as the government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that tribune of liberty, Patrick Henry-who stated to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 that “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of a Signer of the Declaration and premier advocate of American independence, Richard Henry Lee-who stated in The Federal Farmer that “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that zealous guardian of our inherent rights, George Mason-who stated that “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of the declaimer of our independence and theoretician of our freedoms, Thomas Jefferson-who stated in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution, that “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms”; and

Whereas, The Boards of Supervisors of many Virginia counties and the Councils of many Virginia cities have recognized this dangerous departure from the doctrine of the Founders on the part of the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, These Boards of Supervisors and Councils have passed resolutions refusing to countenance what they affirm are unwarranted and unconstitutional measures by that government to infringe the firearm rights of Virginians; and

Whereas, The actions of the government at Richmond undertaken since the recent general election have, regrettably, resulted in unproductive contention and escalating a lamentable state of civic tension; and

Whereas, That, as has been proven in numerous instances, such as have been observed internationally in more recent times with the peaceful dissolutions of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union, and the creation of South Sudan, or, earlier in Virginia’s own history, with the formation of Kentucky, the peaceful partition of neighboring peoples can occur, and, is often very beneficial to both sides in reducing tensions and improving the tenor of discourse over ongoing political and societal differences; and

Whereas, Article VI, Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into, and become part of this state, with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state; and

Whereas, In a spirit of conciliation, the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia, under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution, specifically, with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed, and, we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitutions; and

Whereas, Providing that the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall give its assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity and ability to do so, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia.

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service