'Hate speech creates a clear and present danger'


Keith Ellison

Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., said in a tweet he is asking the Justice Department to launch an investigation about the legalities of a protest at a Phoenix mosque that included the participation of gun-carrying activists.

But as some social media posters were quick to point out: Investigate them for what – legally protesting?

Ellison in a tweet wrote: “@RepAndreCarson and I are asking the Obama Administration to investigate the armed rally at Phoenix mosque.”

A couple Twitter users were quick to comment.

“Investigate what? The counter-protest already took care of that problem. Free speech does its own plumbing,” wrote one.

And another: “Investigate them for legally protesting?”


The protest Ellison was referring to occurred at the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix in late May, held in part to show solidarity with the “Draw Muhammad” contest in Texas. Approximately 250 protesters carrying American flags and depictions of the Prophet Muhammad assembled outside of the mosque that had previously been attended by the two gunmen from Phoenix who opened gunfire on the “Draw Muhammad” event. Various media outlets described the protest as heated to the point where police had to physically separate Muslims and rally participants, some of whom were armed.

YOU READ IT HERE FIRST! JAN. 21, 2007: New Muslim congressman called for terrorist’s release – Ellison spoke at fund-raiser for SLA member who killed California woman, bombed cops

Protest organizers, however, said the First Amendment guarantees them the right to rally, and police at the scene didn’t dispute that fact. Still, Ellison and Carson wrote to Attorney General Loretta Lynch and asked for intervention.

They wrote, Twitchy reported: “These demonstrators argue that they are exercising their First Amendment rights. What they fail to understand is that First Amendment rights are not absolute: they are limited to protect the safety and rights of others.”

One big problem with the protest is that some participants carried weapons, they wrote.

“The presence of assault weapons coupled with deep seeded bigotry and hate speech creates a clear and present danger to worshippers and threatens lawless action,” the letter stated. “The activity of these armed anti-Muslim demonstrators comes at a time when anti-Muslim hate crimes are on the rise. As anti-Muslim violence and bigotry sweep across the country, we must do everything we can to prevent further tragedy and discrimination.”

Ellison, from Minnesota, was the first Muslim elected to the House of Representatives.

Views: 830

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Here's an idea Rep. Ellison, learn a little more about our constitution before opening your mouth.

I have no doubt that every mosk in the nation has you on speed dial for situations such as these.

If protesting offends you and the Muslims attending these mosk, get over it or move to a country that follows your Sharia B.S.

Why would you build a mosk here other than to have a safe haven to preach Sharia. Well guess what, we are on to you and your little infiltration game. Don't expect it to get any easier, why would anyone with common since trust a religion that condones what is going on around the world in the name of your religion.

Dang Straight!

Hey we need to do what the British did when they fought these savages, when you kill one you rap him in Pig Skin throw him or she in a hole and just pore a little Pig blood on it that seemed to quite things down, now I'm not sure if this is fact or fiction but it sounds very effective !

Do we not see a coalition with Muslims and Communists? My idea is to find a video of the beheading of children and take a still photo! Then have this blown up and placed on posters! We still have freedom of speech for now and let the facts with photos tell the story. What would those Muslims at this Mosque do then? Make them take sides to show their true support of butchery!

Excellent reply. I second it

If the SOB muslim commie IDIOTS think about who it was that went to Texas and open fire then I would say the legally carried weapons were a good choice.   Theyneed to listen to the crap coming out of the muslims mouths around the country and world and go after them if they want to be respected here.  Thay need to become Americans not try to change America to become what they left.  Ship them all back to Iran beginning with the 2 SOB's in congress that think something needs to be done.  Oh yeah and send sharpton with them.

Please send Sharpton as a parting gift.

Add these to the list too:

muslim bros in the whitehouse


First of all, what idiot voters put a known muslim in office?!! The idiots that voted for obummer did not know he was a muslim in disguise. Secondly,carrying weapons in a state where it is legal to do so poses no threat of danger while protesting. This muslim jerk is using jihadist tactics to get want he (they) want in our country....dismantle our rights,liberties and Constitution!

Idiot voters----We must all vote in-order to rid America of traitors like Keith U TERRORIST ENABLER-VOTE ALL MUST VOTE-God save America.

Minnesota has the largest concentration of Muslims in the USA. I guess they don't realize that the 1st amendment not only protects their right to be Muslims, it also protects protesters against their religion.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Michael RamirezPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


Fact Check:   'Joe Biden Claims ‘We Didn’t Lock People Up In Cages’

CLAIM: Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed, on immigration: “We didn’t lock people up in cages.”

VERDICT: FALSE. The “cages” were built by the Obama-Biden administration.

Univision moderator Jorge Ramos asked Biden at the third Democrat debate at Texas Southern University in Houston, Texas, why Latinos should trust him after the Obama administration continued deporting “undocumented immigrants.”

Biden claimed that the Obama administration’s policies were more humane than those of President Donald Trump: “We didn’t lock people up in cages,” he said.

In fact, the “cages” were built by the Obama administration to deal with a surge of unaccompanied minors who crossed the border illegally in 2014.

Originally, the Obama administration was “warehousing” children — literally — in overwhelmed Border Patrol facilities. Breitbart News broke the story of the surge, which was partly triggered by Obama’s policy of allowing illegal alien children who entered the country as minors to stay in the country (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA).

Above image credit: AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, Pool, File

The above photo was published by the Associated Press in June 2014, and the photo below is of Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, touring a Border Patrol facility with “cages.”

Above: Border Patrol officers escort Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Gov. Jan Brewer through the department’s Nogales processing facility for immigrant children. (Photo courtesy Barry Bahler/Department of Homeland Security)

The “cages” are chain-link enclosures in Border Patrol processing facilities that are meant to protect children from adults in custody. They are not permanent accommodations.

In mid-2018, as the Trump administration began enforcing a “zero tolerance” policy that stopped the “catch-and-release” policy of letting illegal aliens go after they were arrested. Detaining adults and children meant that children had to be processed separately; the enclosures prevented adults from harming children.

As Breitbart News reported at the time, children were not housed in “cages.” They were processed and then taken to shelters, where they were given medical care, toiletries, education, recreation, and counseling, and where staff attempted to find relatives or sponsors to whom they could be released.

Democrats began tweeting images of “kids in cages” to condemn the Trump administration. Journalists, too, shared those images.

One problem: they were taken during the Obama administration.

Public outrage at the images led President Trump to end the policy, and require families to be detained together.

Democrats keep repeating the mistake, however: in July, they had to delete a tweet that used an image from the Obama era and cited the “inhumane treatment” of children by the Trump administration.

Republicans argue that not detaining illegal aliens is actually the cruel policy, because it encourages migrants to undertake a dangerous journey, often guided by cartels and smugglers.

As Breitbart News’ Alana Mastrangelo noted recently:

But what’s worse than “cages,” however, are reports of migrant children also being handed over to human traffickers during the Obama administration — while Biden was vice president — according to the New York Times. Between October 2013 and July 2015 alone, nearly 80,000 unaccompanied children from Central American countries were detained by U.S. authorities.

It remains unclear how many of the tens of thousands of children were handed over to human traffickers — including sex traffickers — during that span of nearly two years, as those cases are reportedly not tracked.

“Others were ransomed by the very smugglers to whom their families paid thousands of dollars to sneak them into the United States,” reported the New York Times in 2015, during Obama’s presidency and Biden’s vice presidency. “Some lost limbs during the journey or found themselves sold into sexual slavery.”

Biden told voters in South Carolina last month that he would close all border detention facilities, guaranteeing that the migrant flow would continue.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service