MSNBC’s Tur Suggests Trump Will Be Responsible for ‘Suspicious Deaths’ of Journalists

Image result for katy tur ugly memeMSNBC took its fear mongering smears of the Donald Trump administration to a dark new low Monday afternoon when reporter Katy Tur suggested the president’s war with the media would start racking up actual casualties. During an interview with Nebraska Senator Deb Fischer, a Republican, Tur suggested Trump would take a page from Russian President Vladimir Putin’s playbook and start targeting journalists for death.

As we know, there's, since 2000, been a couple dozen suspicious deaths of journalists in Russia who came out against the government there,” Tur reminded the Senator before unscrupulously suggesting Trumps distaste for the media would escalate, “Donald Trump has made no secret about going after journalists and his distaste for any news that doesn't agree with him here. Do you find that this is a dangerous path he is heading down?

Fischer defending the president saying that it’s his job to foster relationships with leaders from countries around the globe. “And I believe that President Trump will recognize, or does recognize right now, who Putin is,” she added in his defense.

But Tur wasn’t having any of it, pressuring the Senator by asking, “What makes you say that he does recognize who Putin is when he hasn't said so publicly?” The Senator tried to argue that the new president wasn’t going to sour the relationship right out of the gate, but was cut off by her interviewer. “There is a difference between attacking and flattering,” Tur spat.

read more:

Views: 476

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

MSNBC would be wise to fire her for defamation of the President! There are no trump 'body bags' but check out the Clintons and Obamas! Remember the liberals accuse those who oppose them of that which they are guilty!

I believe the left has evidence the Obama administration had Breitbart and Anthony Scalia killed in some kind of CIA Black Ops.

Now they're trying to setup Trump so when someone dies, the left can immediately accuse him...

Liberal retards dreaming up stories. I would hold the person making up such a wild story to be held accountable. They base Donald Trump on what they have done in the past themselves.

It looks like the conspiracy theorists is MSNBC itself. Do they really think that Trump will have them killed? I've noticed a trend with CNN and MSNBC. Quite often the media will relate to Trump to Russia or Putin. And they ask the same stupid question. "Do you not think the president is going down a dangerous path here?" To me watching Hardball with Chris Mathews and Rachel Maddows is like watching the National Enquirer on TV. They condemn the president as a racist for putting America first. All sensible countries put themselves first as should we. Does that make them racists? MSNBC's Hardball should be called Hardcore Bullshit.

In another couple of weeks this piece of horse pockky will become a "real " news story.    I guess now a days those that go thru Journalism school need to check common sense/intelligence at the door.   Maybe clean up those teaching the classes....they should be shown the door.     Direct them  right out of the place. 


These republicans in Congress still don't get it, you have to stand up to them and either she does not know all the things that have been going on in our country or just to cowardly to state the facts.  Sammysdad you are correct she could have indicated all the suspicious deaths in our country which includes many more than just Scalia.  It is like what I said, they try to accuse their adversaries of engaging in the same behaviors they indulge in. It is another item in their tool box to destroy them (even if it means death). 

To them the end justifies the means. Wondering if she is giving us one of their next plan?

You have to remember these are real evil people, depending on where they are in this organized gang denotes how evil.  Their lust for power will not be satisfied. 

Here we go..............another incredible all new low from the media.  That's DISGUSTING.  Trump is right....the media IS part of the opposition.  How do we fight it?

If her accusations had any credibility - the string of suspicious deaths would have started with hers.

Yea, that won't happen soon enough!

What's up Frank?  Reading my mind?  Have a crystal ball?   Was TOTALLY thinking the same thing  ;o)))))

Related image

How come none of the media inquire about all the suspicious deaths surrounding the Clintons?




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service