Why is it that when a Muslim student that is an avowed member of ISI, and brings an IED to school, is  not even mentioned by the MSM as a terrorist threat to the school?  I believe it is because he is Muslim and he does not fit the Liberals narrative of a school terrorist, like Nikolas Cruz did because he used a gun and was NOT Muslim.  Muslims are the darlings of the Liberals and can do no wrong.  Just think what would have happened to our country with immigration if Hillary had become president.  this Youth should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.  He is a danger to society, not just his school.  Why did the MSM ignore this incident in your opinion, and what can be done to insure that the citizenry knows of such danger to our society?

Views: 59

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Certain groups are now "approved", just like in Nazi Germany.

"Out" are white males, Christians, conservatives, gun-holders, constitutionalists, Trump voters, home-schooled students and stay at home Moms.

"In" are the fascist women, homosexuals, trannies, commies, social justice warriors, gender junkers, Sol Alinskyites, Leninites, Marxists, Globalists, hillary/billary and obama fans, and of course, Opra. Oh, and muslimes. They are so peaceful that for sure, under their rule, we will all coexist (right to the death).

It is like Nazi Germany in some ways.  We are not allowed to disagree with the fascist women, homosexuals, LGBT, Communists, SJW, and Obama fans and Hillary fans are trying to change the narrative of our President.  They have not accepted that Donald Trump is our President.  Muslims are to be treated with kid gloves.  Anything that represents Christianity must be removed so they are not insulted.  This sounds like the removal of the Jews.  Christianity is persecuted and told it is "bad"  The Muslims are seriously a major threat to the US.Please read the following plan for the Muslim Brotherhood's Plan to take over America.


  • .

It is about the numbers. They are quiet until the numbers reach a certain percentage, then they whine and complain like democrats. Then they become violent. The police and government back off. The jihad is then nearly complete. More numbers. More aggression. Then the hate, the rape, the killings, the culling.

They are foul in their thinking and demonic in their emotions.

Your comments is weird, there is 535 Members of Congress, who are they and why are they allowing such issues in America?

 Who are they connected to?

United Nations

The EU

The UK, of which all most all the seats are held by Muslims.

The 535 Members of Congress are Jewish, British,German, and others from other countries.

The members of the US Congress and the Senate are Americans.  They are not mainly 1st generation immigrants, though some may be.  There are 2 Muslim members of Congress.  Most are Protestant, than Catholic. then it is split into other religions.  Jewish, Mormons, Orthodox Christians, Unitarians,  The following web site is where I got the info.  The Muslim Brotherhood - did you read the info on  them in the reply to Jea9?  You really should read it.  It explains their plan to take over the US.  The Muslims are planning to take over the US and implement Sharia Law here.  They have 33 no go zones-encampments in the US.`where they are amassing weapons.  They do not let non Muslims go into these areas.  The Muslims are dangerous.  Islam is NOT a religion of peace.  They are lying when they say that.Never trust a Muslim.


They are not Americans,

 Nice reply though,

 If you have 535 Members of Congress, and 51 senators can block the wishes of 435 representatives, and they hold seats of Parliament of the British Empire as well as Israel, holding seats of (CFR) Council on Foreign Relations, and connect the DNC dots for CAIR: CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations - CAIR

 To Change the Constitution from COS- Convention of States to 51 Senators with all the power, is Unconstitutional.

 Most Jews that live in America are not supported in their views of Muslims by Jews that live in Israel.

 Israel and most Muslim Countries are at war but all of the Muslim Countries are listed as a Country and not a state as, Israel is listed.

 The Magna Carta of Israel as a State is well noted by the British Empire.

great post.  yes approved is right any God fearing; constitution loving; gun toting American is well under attack.   God forbid we want our flag saluted or our national anthem wow you would think what in the world we are asking.  When I see the mexican flag being waved if u want that ok go to mexico and stay there w/my blessings.   

yes they want our country gone and boy it is up to us now to vote them out and we must.   CA; IL; NY all of them shear disasters.   

I am afraid we are past the point of just voting. When Goudy doesn't even do his job...

When RINO's McConnell and Ryan are holding up all the rest of Trump's nominees for judgeships...

When the R's have done almost nothing in the way of oversight of the witch hunt or of stopping the witchhunt after over a year of nothing....

When Hellary walks free...

When Hellary and Abedin still have security clearances...

and more




Reporter Kicked Out Of Michelle Obama
Conference For Violating ‘Black Girl Code’

The Black Entertainment Television channel recently hosted a conference in south Florida for black women known as “Leading Women Defined,” which featured a casual conversation between former first lady Michelle Obama and former senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

But according to the New York Post’s Page Six, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was in attendance was booted from the remainder of the conference after she wrote an article about some of the comments Obama had made during the discussion.

Robin Givhan, a fashion critic and staff writer for The Washington Post, documented the highlights of the friendly chat between Obama and Jarrett.

Some of the highlights of the conversation included the former first lady’s thoughts on President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the Obamas prepared to leave the White House, the role she played during the 2008 election, her difficulty settling in as “the spouse” to the president, how she described her White House garden as a “subversive act” to garner trust with the public and her upcoming memoir. Of course Givhan also wrote about what Obama was wearing … after all, she is a fashion critic.

But following the publication of the article, according to Page Six, BET demanded Givhan leave the conference early amid claims that she had violated a “sacred space” by publishing the content of the conversation.

They also canceled a panel discussion that Givhan initially had been asked to moderate.

However, Page Six noted that BET’s claim that Obama’s discussion was “private” and not intended to be shared with anyone else outside the small gathering in attendance didn’t hold up to scrutiny given the fact that BET itself posted clips from the discussion on its site.

Furthermore, Jarrett also posted those clips on social media and told everyone to “tune in” to the network so they could hear what Obama had to say.

Shortly thereafter, the dispute descended into a sharp back-and-forth on social media between Givhan and others who were irked at what she had done, as can be seen on Givhan’s Twitter feed.

Several of her critics asserted that the conversation had been “off-the-record” — an assertion Givhan flatly denied — and one user claimed the reporter had “violated a sacred trust” between black women.

Another said what she had done was a “complete violation of journalistic ethics and Black girl code, all at once,” while still another asserted through a hashtag that Givhan was “#notoneofus,” as if she were being banished from the exclusive realm of accepted professional black women.

For their part, a BET representative told Page Six that Givhan had been “invited as a guest (not working press) to moderate a fashion panel,” and noted that her travel and lodging expenses had been paid for by the network.

“She was made aware that it was an intimate conversation in a sacred space of sisterhood and fellowship,” the rep added.

Neither Givhan nor representatives for Obama responded to requests for comment on the report from Page Six.

If the WaPo reporter really was instructed ahead of time that the conversation between Obama and Jarrett was “off the record” and a private affair, but published anyway, then BET was justified in booting her from the remainder of the conference — though the mean-spirited commentary she received on social media still crossed the line.

But if Givhan received no prior warning on the matter — and given the fact that BET itself published the conversation later — then this is just a major display of hypocrisy and unnecessary infighting.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service