Why is it that when a Muslim student that is an avowed member of ISI, and brings an IED to school, is  not even mentioned by the MSM as a terrorist threat to the school?  I believe it is because he is Muslim and he does not fit the Liberals narrative of a school terrorist, like Nikolas Cruz did because he used a gun and was NOT Muslim.  Muslims are the darlings of the Liberals and can do no wrong.  Just think what would have happened to our country with immigration if Hillary had become president.  this Youth should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.  He is a danger to society, not just his school.  Why did the MSM ignore this incident in your opinion, and what can be done to insure that the citizenry knows of such danger to our society?

Views: 85

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Certain groups are now "approved", just like in Nazi Germany.

"Out" are white males, Christians, conservatives, gun-holders, constitutionalists, Trump voters, home-schooled students and stay at home Moms.

"In" are the fascist women, homosexuals, trannies, commies, social justice warriors, gender junkers, Sol Alinskyites, Leninites, Marxists, Globalists, hillary/billary and obama fans, and of course, Opra. Oh, and muslimes. They are so peaceful that for sure, under their rule, we will all coexist (right to the death).

It is like Nazi Germany in some ways.  We are not allowed to disagree with the fascist women, homosexuals, LGBT, Communists, SJW, and Obama fans and Hillary fans are trying to change the narrative of our President.  They have not accepted that Donald Trump is our President.  Muslims are to be treated with kid gloves.  Anything that represents Christianity must be removed so they are not insulted.  This sounds like the removal of the Jews.  Christianity is persecuted and told it is "bad"  The Muslims are seriously a major threat to the US.Please read the following plan for the Muslim Brotherhood's Plan to take over America.

https://clarionproject.org/muslim_brotherhood_explanatory_memorandum/

  • .

It is about the numbers. They are quiet until the numbers reach a certain percentage, then they whine and complain like democrats. Then they become violent. The police and government back off. The jihad is then nearly complete. More numbers. More aggression. Then the hate, the rape, the killings, the culling.

They are foul in their thinking and demonic in their emotions.

Your comments is weird, there is 535 Members of Congress, who are they and why are they allowing such issues in America?

 Who are they connected to?

United Nations

The EU

The UK, of which all most all the seats are held by Muslims.

The 535 Members of Congress are Jewish, British,German, and others from other countries.

The members of the US Congress and the Senate are Americans.  They are not mainly 1st generation immigrants, though some may be.  There are 2 Muslim members of Congress.  Most are Protestant, than Catholic. then it is split into other religions.  Jewish, Mormons, Orthodox Christians, Unitarians,  The following web site is where I got the info.  The Muslim Brotherhood - did you read the info on  them in the reply to Jea9?  You really should read it.  It explains their plan to take over the US.  The Muslims are planning to take over the US and implement Sharia Law here.  They have 33 no go zones-encampments in the US.`where they are amassing weapons.  They do not let non Muslims go into these areas.  The Muslims are dangerous.  Islam is NOT a religion of peace.  They are lying when they say that.Never trust a Muslim.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/3/religious-makeup-of...

They are not Americans,

 Nice reply though,

 If you have 535 Members of Congress, and 51 senators can block the wishes of 435 representatives, and they hold seats of Parliament of the British Empire as well as Israel, holding seats of (CFR) Council on Foreign Relations, and connect the DNC dots for CAIR: CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations - CAIR

 To Change the Constitution from COS- Convention of States to 51 Senators with all the power, is Unconstitutional.

 Most Jews that live in America are not supported in their views of Muslims by Jews that live in Israel.

 Israel and most Muslim Countries are at war but all of the Muslim Countries are listed as a Country and not a state as, Israel is listed.

 The Magna Carta of Israel as a State is well noted by the British Empire.

great post.  yes approved is right any God fearing; constitution loving; gun toting American is well under attack.   God forbid we want our flag saluted or our national anthem wow you would think what in the world we are asking.  When I see the mexican flag being waved if u want that ok go to mexico and stay there w/my blessings.   

yes they want our country gone and boy it is up to us now to vote them out and we must.   CA; IL; NY all of them shear disasters.   

I am afraid we are past the point of just voting. When Goudy doesn't even do his job...

When RINO's McConnell and Ryan are holding up all the rest of Trump's nominees for judgeships...

When the R's have done almost nothing in the way of oversight of the witch hunt or of stopping the witchhunt after over a year of nothing....

When Hellary walks free...

When Hellary and Abedin still have security clearances...

and more

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

ALERT ALERT

OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service