More from the White Privilege Conference: Tea party = RACISM

Whoopi Goldberg white face / Youtube screenshot

 

Not only are all members of the tea party movement racists, but the longer a  person associates with the tea party, the more racist he becomes — according to  a speaker at the National White Privilege Conference, which was held in Madison,  Wisconsin, last week.

Leonard Zeskind, an author and activist, hosted a session on the racist roots  of the tea party, a limited government movement that returned the U.S. House of  Representatives to Republican control in 2010.

POLL 1:SHOULD THE CURRENT IMMIGRATION LAWS BE ENFORCED BEFORE CONGRESS BEGINS TO CONSIDER ANY IMMIGRATION REFORM?

In Zeskind’s view, the oppression of minorities is a central motivating  principal of the tea party.

“There has been a longitudinal study that finds the longer you are in the tea  party, the more racist you become,” he said, according to the MacIver Institute, which  covered the conference.

Tea party groups are similar to white nationalist groups, he said.

“Is it racist?” he asked. He then answered his own question: “Yes.”

Zeskind denounced other racists as well. People who send their kids to  private schools are also racists. People who disagree with President Obama are  racists.

The Daily Caller previously reported on a different session, in which a  former high school teacher claimed that teaching was a fundamentally political  act and all teachers who were unwilling to use their post to rail against white  oppression should “get the fuck out” of education.

Read more:  http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/02/more-from-the-white-privilege-con...

Views: 604

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Next, they will tell us, that being A WHITE,  is RACIST. 

you are right...its ok to have the black caucus in congress---that's not racists but if anyone dares starts a "white student union"..oh hell!!!!..disagree with obama--racists...yep thats why I disagree with him cause he's black...PUHLEASE..he's a communist,radical liberal big government guy with moral issues that I dont agree with..NOTHING to do with skin...my favorite guys on the GOP/Tea Party side are black,hispanoc&white...Carson,West,Cain,Cruz,Paul..we are past skin color even tho the race-baiters are trying to keep it alive otherwise they lose their "jobs".

Oh we're already there.

They are already teaching it to children in elementary schools under common core.

That's exactly what this POS is saying and who ever heard of a "White Privilege Conference"??? WTF they cannot make this shit up and they have the audacity to call the Tea Party "Racists"...My God, how can it get more obvious who is being Racist here!!!

HELL, THEY ALREADY HAVE!

Ask me if I actually care however.................

Been called worse by better people.....

THE NATIONAL WHITE PRIVILEGE CONFERENCE? WTF IS THAT IF NOT RACIST, ARE YOU KIDDING ME? WOW!!!!!! I'M WHITE AND I AM COMPLETELY OFFENDED BY THAT TITLE, AND I HAVE NO DAM PRIVILEGES EXCEPT WORKING MY ASS OFF JUST TO STAY AFLOAT DAM IT. I HAD NO CHOICE IN THE MATTER OF BEING WHITE, IT WASN'T MY DECISION YOU DOUCHES, NOR AM I ASHAMED OF IT. BUT I AM SO DAM TIRED OF BEING CALLED A RACIST AND THE "KILL WHITEY" MONTRA. SO TO ALL THOSE AL SHARPTONS AND JESSIE JACKSONS AND THE BLACK CAUCUS AND THE NATIONAL WHITE PRIVILEGE CONFERENCE DOUCHE BAGS, YOU CAN ALL KISS MY ASS!!!!!!

BULLCRAP,  if you were born in the USA, you have every opportunity to be anything you want
to be,  if you do not take advantage of your gift of freedom, then you either too dam lazy to
get off your dead ass,  or too stupid.  white privilage, stick it up where the sun don't shine.

Spot on Ma'am!!!

We are labeled as "Racist" because we applied ourselves in school, worked hard to become self sufficiant, Served our Country, tried to actually RAISE OUR children and teach them how to respect and succeed in life through hard work (KEY WORD "WORK").

So, to Hell with the name callers. Just DON'T call me late for supper!!

LOL, AMEN SIR ESPECIALLY THE LAST PART. NEVER CALL ME LATE FOR DINNER!!!!! 

Brelan -- that our mere existence as Caucasions causes us to naturally be racist IS is the central premise of their goofy ideology.

Some 20 years ago, shortly after I reported-in to a developmental assignment as Deputy Director of Public Affairs at Tank-Automitive in metro-Detroit I was accosted in the hallway outside my office by an irate Black woman who screamed at me 'you took my job' White M-Fer' ... she ranted for two full minutes & blocked my egress as I tried to disengage ... had one of Federal Police not intervened who knows what she might have done?!

Once inside I told the Director about it ... he told me that the woman had filed on the position as an 'EEO Upward Mobility' candidate ... she was a GS-5 trying to get a GS-13 professional position based solely on her race & gender. She had a high school education only, no journalism experience; no management training or experience; and had only marginal performance reviews at her clerical pool job -- but she wanted the job.

Later that week the EEO manager called me in to her office to quiz me on how I got the position ... the woman had filed an official race/gender bias complaint!

It didn't matter in that insane program that I had three Master's degrees, was working on a PH.D., had 20 years of experience in private sector & military journalism or that I was in the Senior Executive Service development program -- race & gender trumped all of that.

As it turned out the SES development program designation of the position excluded 'normal' selection processes -- standards for which the woman did not meet. No one goes from GS-5 to 13 in one leap, but the EEO fanatics won't be deterred by laws or rules ... they hate, pure & simple ... and we're guilty just because we're not them. ... or they're not us.

I was at that command for 20 months before being selected for promotion & transfer to Beijing & later to Korea and the entire time I was there this woman stalked me -- yet EEO refused to intervene on my behalf because I was a senior manager ... a White male ... I was fair game -- she was protected ... 

Hate in America directed toward majority population persons is alive and well ... and it's not a new phenomon ... it's just worse today than ever.

Have they ever looked at some of the videos of the Tea Party? Seems to be a lot on non whites there. Guess they do not consider a black person black if they associate with us. Same for women. If they are not liberal they are not viable. Sarah Palin anyone. THEY ARE THE RACIST AND INTOLERANT.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service