Model Quits Twitter after Backlash to Tweet Bashing America

After being called out for using the October 22 terror attack on Canada as an opportunity to bash America on Twitter, super model Chrissy Teigen is leaving Twitter for Instagram to escape criticism.

It all started while the police response to the terror attack was still ongoing, and Teigen tweeted, "Active shooting in Canada, or as we call it in america, wednesday."

The response to Teigen's tweet was swift and relentless, and she tried to diffuse the outrage by explaining that she was knocking America, not Canada. She tweeted: "Sorry you don't understand that is a knock at america and our issues with gun control. No one is minimizing the Ottawa shooting."

As the outrage continued, Teigen made clear she would not recant her tweets nor would she apologize.


Views: 627

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

YES, and NOW!!!!!

Dumb model that's all.

typical stupid liberal nothing new here.

Hoping for dinner with berry&moochelle,trash ?

Another airhead "celebrity"!  By the way, who the hell is this nobody?

Time for Constitutional military take over of all obvious traitors in o's admin starting with

beelzebub himself!!!!!


These Libs forget to mention the knife beheadings and the hatchet attack. These acts of terrorism makes it even more important to bear arms, to protect ourselves from these nuts that Obama is allowing to enter our Country, along with MANY Illegal aliens and many of them criminals, that he released to our streets.

There is ONLY one conclusion to these acts; to destroy our Freedom and Country!

the disturbing part is, she doesn't see how it is the truth that she is an overwhelmingly cheap and active part of the culture directly causing the moral decay she tweets about, including the violence.

This individual is nothing but a parasite on the derrière of this nation.  If she has a problem with it why does she not have the nerve to pack up her bag and just leave.  Her status as a model does not give her any special intelligence.  Bad mouthing the very Nation that gave her the opportunity to succeed only shows that anyone with decent looks and no brains  would be capable of doing the same gig.I would love to see every red blooded American Woman refrain from the purchase of anything she promotes and models. She obviously has no loyalty or respect. Perhaps she just thinks she was being cute with the gun comments, but let the chips fall and an armed person will be the first person on she looks to for help. So many celebrities now days talk a lot about gun control and I believe she was just jumping on the band wagon attempting to be cute .  While they are talking about gun control most of them have some type of armed protection. Why is that? Perhaps they do not have the backbone to protect themselves and pay someone else to do their dirty work, (doncha' think?)      

Just another person who personifies:  Big Money - Big Mouth, and in this case Big empty head. 

I too doubt that Congress will Impeach/Convict Obama, but if the Voters want to target his biggest supporters, look at this list below:



Michael Bennet (Colorado)
Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut)
Barbara Boxer (California)
Patrick Leahy (Vermont)
Barbara Mikulski (Maryland)
Patty Murray (Washington)
Harry Reid (Nevada)
Charles Schumer (New York)
Ron Wyden (Oregon)

Fisherman Pat

Thanks for assembling the list.  Since there's only 9 and most appear to be invulnerable in states where their voters are brainwashed and brain-dead, about the only thing that can stop these senators from getting re-elected is if their constituents are too spaced out to vote, and the DNC can't manipulate the polls.

But rather than get into filing articles of impeachment and trying for a conviction that will never happen, the GOP will need to re-introduce much of the legislation that it has passed in the House during this congress, but that died in the Senate. The legislation should reflect the needs of the United States including securing the border, but saying only that immigration "reform" will not be considered until the border is secure. There will have to be legislation that reduces burdens on small businesses so they can start functioning again.  None of the bills should be long and complex, and there will need to be a lot of publicity when Obama vetoes them.   The danger, though, is that Obama might sign them, then  undermine them and blame the GOP when they don't function as they should. Every action has consequences, and those consequences must be studied before trying to move too fast. It might be best to focus on repealing bad regulations with complete explanations of why(but not for negotiation). The GOP is gong to have to do a better job explaining a lot of things, like why the economy hasn't collapsed yet with an $18T national debt.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service