'My wish is that you will be disruptors'

pelosi_12

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

Did House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi have anything to do with the riot Wednesday night on the campus of the University of California at Berkeley in response to a planned talk by Breitbart News editor Milo Yiannopoulos.

Talk host Michael Savage, who aired a clip from Pelosi’s 2014 commencement address at the university, thinks so.

“Being called a disruptor is a high compliment,” Pelosi said in the speech. “You here at Berkeley are already disruptors in many ways.”

She closed with: “My wish is that you will be disruptors when necessary, and that you enjoy every moment of it.”

Savage commented on his show Thursday: “Now you know who was behind what happened at Berkeley last night.

“Don’t look any further than the leadership in San Francisco for what happened. The question is, where is the new leadership going to come from?

Savage noted that in the 1960s, the president of San Francisco State College stood up on a car during a campus protest, waved his hat and yelled at the students, telling them to go home.

“And he stopped the riots. He was hero-worshipped for it,” Savage said.

“Where are those men today?”

Wednesday night, the planned talk by Yiannopoulos was canceled after violent protesters hurled smoke bombs, broke windows and started a bonfire outside the building where he was to appear.

Last week, Savage reveled in the first week of the Trump administra... as a whirlwind of executive orders began dismantling President Obama’s progressive legacy.

“Everything we ever dreamed of happening is now happening,” Savage told his listeners after airing a live feed of Trump’s remarks at the White House regarding executive orders to advance the building of a wall on the Mexican border and to penalize cities that refuse to enforce federal immigration laws.

Savage’s message of borders, language and culture was a fixture in the campaign of the real estate billionaire, who was a frequent guest on Savage’s show. Savage has described his latest book, “Scorched Earth: Restoring the Country After Obama,” as “an architectural plan for Trump.”


http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/michael-savage-pelosi-incited-berkeley-r...

Image result for bitch slap nancy pelosi animation

Views: 753

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Not one single socialist DEM even condemned the riots in Berkeley. Not one. Robert Moron Reisch actually blamed it on a secret right-wing group. What a brain dead DEM he's always been.

These DEMs all have blood on their miserable hands. The far-far left wing anarchist group (ANTIFA) were the actual culprits on that Berkeley campus. They had also teamed up with BLM for riots in Baltimore. These same animals will be causing their havoc on February 20th in front of Trump Towers in NYC. And who do you think is funding these criminals? Yup, the infamous GS!

The Berkeley campus police did absolutely nothing, accept to protect the insane communist instructors inside the building. These keystone cops were all dressed up in their riot gear, but basically did nothing to prevent the destruction. They said that they told the students to disperse, but the Anarchists simply laughed at them. Students (mostly GOP and Trump supporters) were injured. One girl had her faced sprayed with pepper spray, just because she happened to be wearing her red, 'Make America Great' hat.

I say, these Anarchist animals need to face a real confrontation, (not the usual unprepared and unarmed people). Ones that they'll never forget,....or will only leave the scene of their crimes, - horizontal.....

Maybe it's time to take a page out of Ronald Reagan's playbook:

FLASHBACK: Here's How Ronald Reagan Handled Berkeley Protesters

On Wednesday night, violent protesters at the University of California, Berkeley shut down the free speech of a scheduled conservative speaker by rioting, committing arson, destroying property and pepper spraying innocent Trump supporters in attendance. There was indeed a police presence, but there was no reason for them being there, as the officers were seemingly handcuffed by authorities from actually acting on the violent thugs. 

As summed up nicely by vile leftist Debra Messing in a celebratory tweet, the violent rioting from leftist thugs "worked": free speech was successfully suppressed due to the violent actions of the "tolerant" left. 

VIDEORight-wing speaker at Berkeley canceled after protests

After the fact, President Donald Trump reacted to the insanity by issuing a tweet suggesting he might revoke federally funding from the university if free speech continues to be suppressed. 

If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view - NO FEDERAL FUNDS?

But how have past state and local officials handled disorderly protesters in the past? When Ronald Reagan was serving as governor of California in 1969, he was faced with student protesters on the Berkeley campus who refused to follow the rule of law; their protest eventually morphed into a riot. Reagan's approach in handling such students was no-nonsense, to put it mildly.

Watch:

Berkeley.edu reports

Students and activists had begun an attempt to transform a vacant plot of university property into "People's Park." Attempting to head off the activists, the university engaged a fencing company, accompanied by 250 police, to erect a chain-link fence around the land at 4 a.m. on May 15, 1969. Five hours later, a rally was called on Sproul Plaza to protest the action. Resource, a current UC Berkeley reference guide for new students, relates the story of how Reagan intervened, sending in the National Guard:

"The rally, which drew 3,000 people, soon turned into a riot, as the crowd moved down Telegraph (Ave.) towards the park. That day, known as Bloody Thursday, three students suffered punctured lungs, another a shattered leg, 13 people were hospitalized with shotgun wounds, and one police officer was stabbed. James Rector, who was watching the riot from a rooftop, was shot by police gunfire; he died four days later.

"At the request of the Berkeley mayor, Governor Ronald Reagan declared a state of emergency and sent 2,200 National Guard troops into Berkeley. Some of these guardsmen were even Cal students. At least one young man had participated in the riots, been shot at by police, gotten patched up, and then returned to his dorm to find a notice to report for guard duty. In the following days approximately 1,000 people were arrested: 200 were booked for felonies, and 500 were taken to Santa Rita jail."

The contrast between Reagan's approach with that of California officials in 2017 couldn't be more stark. 

http://www.dailywire.com/news/13131/flashback-heres-how-president-r...

Marilyn, here's perhaps your most salient point, "When Ronald Reagan was serving as GOVERNOR of California in 1969, he was faced with student protesters on the Berkeley campus who refused to follow the rule of law; their protest eventually morphed into a riot. Reagan's approach in handling such students was no-nonsense, to put it mildly." Pres. Trump IS NOT the governor of CA and therefore has no grounds to send in the STATE NATIONAL GUARD as GOV. REAGAN did. In addition, I doubt that the liberal Mayor of Berkeley or governor of CA would ask for federal help, which it likely couldn't due to the Posse Comitatus laws without such a request.

So withholding federal funds from the university would be an excellent approach in as much as there's reason to believe the university didn't adequately protect the scheduled meeting, intentionally. That could include stopping all federal loans to students and all federal research grants. Lest some believe that unlawful, the federal government did that to PRIVATE universities that defied liberal policies at Bob Jones University and Grove City College.

Everything you said-yes, it is disgraceful what is going on in this country.

And not ONE Dem...

Totally agree!

the entire demon rat party is guilty of this and  the rinos too...this is far from over...massive draining of the swamp needs to happen very soon.

 THESE RIOTERS and their PROMOTERS LIKE PELOSI and the rest of the COLLUDING DEMOCRATS are NOW BECOMING "VERBAL INCITERS TO RIOTING" AND OTHER CRIMINAL ACTIVITY REGARDING SOCIAL UNREST !!!!  THESE RIOTS ARE NOT JUST "PEACEFUL PROTESTS" they are on the verge of becoming "SEDICIOUS REVOLUTIONS" and should be TREATED AS SUCH !!!!!!! CALLING FOR the ASSASSINATIONS of our ELECTED OFFICIALS, and other such threats are reminiscent of COMMUNIST BANANA REPUBLIC, CENTRAL AMERICAN every day POLITICS, and SHOULD NOT BE CONDONED, NOR TRIVIALIZED in the USA!!!!!

WE have seen the COMMUNIST HAMMER and SICKLE FLAGS and BANNERS at these RIOTS, and the BLACK FLAGS of the ANARCHISTS,along with other ANTI-AMERICAN symbols calling for all forms of "ILLEGAL ACTIVITY" against our GOVERNMENT !!!!!

WE HAD BETTER GET STARTED ROUNDING UP THE PERPETRATORS "NOW" before the MOBS are at the Gates of the WHITE HOUSE or the TRUMP TOWERS in NY City !!!!

OF COURSE The MEDIA and RIOTERS WILL CALL US FACISTS for doing so. ( they do it anyway) but when we are at the point of such TREASON and SEDITION, we must ACT NOW to prevent a SPREAD of COMMUNIST REVOLUTION HERE IN AMERICA !!!!

We are NOT FACISTS..............We are AMERICAN PATRIOTS DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY !!!!!!

Excellent! You should get with the Trump team.

Totally agree! I am a Trumper!

When campus police chose not to protect students or facilities but chose to stand by and do nothing then the Feds should be sent in and that campus closed down.

Nancy Pelosi needs to be arrested and cited for inciting riot... the Police at Berkley should be FIRED and new officers willing to defend the public's safety at mind hired.  The Chancellor of Berkley should be terminated and the school closed for the remainder of the School year... no one graduates until next year and only then if the University conducts itself lawfully.

She will never be arrested, unfortunately. her husband owns Star Kist Tuna and endless other enterprises that keep her in the style she has become accustomed to. She is speaking like she understands the 'everyday' American's plight but that couldn't be further from the truth; she is an elite puppet master of the people she serves and very far removed from anything 'everyday' Americans experience! Just look how she handled being questioned by the mom of a child killed by an illegal! Disgraceful answers! Claiming 'sanctuary' cities are safe! Where has she been? look at the carnage in Chicago and near our southern border! Such a shame they don't realize she has a mental deficit!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service