Mexico Is Whining About Increased Texas Border Enforcement, Claims It ‘Promotes Division

The Mexican government is not happy with Texas these days. Why? Because Mexico believes the United States should have an open door policy when it comes to immigration.

Of course, that’s exactly what liberals and the Obama administration have essentially advocated for. But, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott isn’t having any of that.

The Mexican government says it regrets Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s decision to sign into law an $800 million border security package that will mean more state troopers, cameras and a spy plane to patrol the U.S. state’s 1,200-mile border with Mexico.

One of the provisions will toughen punishments for convicted human traffickers.

Mexico’s Foreign Relations Department said Wednesday the new law will “promote division between our societies, and runs contrary to the principles and values governing the U.S.-Mexico bilateral relationship.”

Abbott signed the measure Tuesday. It should accelerate the hiring of 250 additional state troopers who will patrol the border, replacing National Guard troops deployed there last summer.

read more:

Views: 925

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ok when Mexico allows Americans to freely migrate to their country via the back door and allow me Mexican benefits then I'll consider a more open rule.But till then They have to use the front door like everyone else.And to the Mexican Officials,We have Borders for a reason just like neighbors have fences.What's mine is mine and what's your is yours.Keep your dogs in your own damn yard.I'm tired of picking up their crap.(TAXES)

I would like to cut off aid to Mexico until it stops the flow of Illegals to America !

And send the bills for caring for their citizens to the el presidente.....




Robert J Trice: You are right!

Most Americans are right and no one seems to be listening!

Through the border of Canada and Mexico; people are flooding into our country... yes; it is not only via Mexico, and not only Mexicans are coming through Mexico... as we have learned that they have caught muslim terrorists coming though the Mexican borders! They have gone as far as to learn the Spanish language to cause some to believe that they are Mexicans! Likewise; there are many areas on the Canadian/ US borderlines where many illegals are sifting their way into our country; we are getting people from different countries and that however, we are not told. We have people from all over the world coming illegaly... I don't know why. I am only concern that it doesn't matter who, or where from... actually... I do care! Nobody that crosses our border illegally, has reason to be here.

What I cannot understand is that if citizens arrests are valid; why hasn't there been an official who has pledged allegiance to the United States of America; taken steps to arrest everyone who has been breaking our laws and our Constitution?

May God bless us and protect us cause from what we can see; the deck stacks against us!

Obama and the Mexican President have shown they supported the Mexican Drug Cartel! Fast and Furious and illegal open borders! Our inner cities now have a 3 fold and more of illegal drugs! Honorable black Americans surely did not need this increase by full cooperative corruption! Obama is half black and stabs black Americans!

Just a short comment     HANG ALL that cross the border ILEGALY FROM MEXICO  and tell Mexico to go and F---  it self.

an old Marine

Should honorable Americans suggest you get a life? If you are a citizen you have a duty to support America and our citizens, or leave!

Love it!!! And so apt!

Poor Mexico, they're as confused as where America stops and Mexico starts. I understand their confusion.

Well we are divided.  2 different countries and we sure as hell don't want all there criminals, drug dealers and rapist here.   Do these people know how stupid they sound when they say crap like that??




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service