By joshdb50

No ma'am.

Senator Dianne Feinstein,

 

I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government's right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma'am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

 

I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

 

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

 

We, the people, deserve better than you.

 

Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012

Views: 2051

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'll keep my own oath, thanks.

I am a member since 2010. I took my oath in 1973.

Senator Dianne Feinstein should be one of the first to be hung by her filthy traitorous neck under the tree of Liberty.

And Harry Reid should be right next to her.. A gun range was opened in Las Vegas and he did some shooting and took credit for its opening and now he is right beside Feinstein to take our rights to defend our selfs for when the gov turns bho`s private army loose on the American people... That army is nothing more than terrorist he has brought into the USA to take over...and make him ruler...

unfortuantely the politicians forget that they work for us, but it becomes the norm that we work for them, support them and their causes, and become the victims of their policies. another sad thing is that everytime a major tragedy strikes us, the politicians always want to create more laws to restrict our freedoms, instead of solving the real problems. 99.9 percent of all these mass shootings are done by people with a history of some form of mental illness. i would like to see congressional hearings on the state of our mental health today, and how these people are treated on a outpatient basis, with strong medications, and no supervision. maybe because those in the mentral health lobby send big bucks to the pots of the politicians, or maybe they do not want to rattle something that would open some secrets, or maybe the gun control options are just more newsworthy.

Joshua, I'm a senior citizen, but I will stand with you anytime. OathKeepers motto:

"Not On My Watch!" Thank you for your service. And anyone out there that is or has been in the service or is or has been a police officer, look up Oath Keepers on the web. Their first law is I will not obey any order to disarm American citizens. For more info. check them out.

REID AN THESE NITWITS HAVE NO CONCEPT OF THE REALITY WE LIVE IN, AND HAVE NO CONSCIENCE. BRAINDEAD DRONES. WE WILL NEVER CONVINCE THEM OF REALITY. THEY MAKE REALITY UP TOO SUIT THEIR AGENDA'S. THE SOROS, MOORE, BLOOMBERG TYPES HAVE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR THEM. THEY ARE BUYING THESE PEOPLE

This is a great letter! I would have finished with this very important statement of facts:

Senator Fienstein you have taken the Constitutional requirement in Article 6, Clause 3. YOU solemnly swear (or affirm) YOU will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that YOU will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that YOU take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that YOU will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which YOU are about to enter. So help me God.'' It appears that YOU Senator Fienstein are in violation of your Solemn oath and that YOU Senator Fienstein have mental reservation and purpose of evasion and that YOU Senator Fienstien are un-faithfully discharging the duties of the office on which YOU Senator Fienstein have entered. Did I also mention YOU Senator Fiestein will bear true faith and allegiance to the same?

You are also Senator Fiestien dishonoring the Preamble to the Bill of Rights:

Congress OF THE United States begun and held at the City of New York, on Wednesday the Fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution.

 

What part of INFRINGED do you NOT understand? What part of the first ten amendments do you not understand? You Senator Fienstein are abusing your powers and misconstruction on the Bill of Rights.

 

Great Letter Mr. Boston.  Thank you for your service.  It is a shame that such a letter is even necessary, to someone in public service who has obviously forgotten she is an employee not an overseer of the American public.  Another example of why all rules and laws applying to the public must also apply to civilian government officials.

As A Former Army Veteran Of The Vietnam Debalacle I Fully Agree.Stay Frosty Cpl.

Thank you Joshua Boston for your service and thank you to all that serve. May those who are elected to serve, come to understand what being a True American is all about.

Let them, who are elected to serve, come to recognize that they are here to support our betterment, not their agenda's!

Let them, who have been elected to serve finally realize that they better begin to serve or expect to be served themselves with what is appropriate for those who perform illegal activity while holding an American Representatives Political Position.

From my written words to ALL TRUE AMERICAN Ears. When do you consider enough is enough?

 

She will have hell getting any guns from me. I would love to see her or any of her butt heads try.

U. S. Army  1962-1965

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

Breaking — West Virginia Lawmakers Invite Persecuted Pro-Second Amendment Counties In Virginia To Join Their State

West Virginia lawmakers introduced legislation to invite persecuted pro Second Amendment Counties to join their state.

The West Virginia Senate adopted a resolution to remind Virginia residents from Frederick County that they have a standing invite — from 1862 — to become part of West Virginia.

West Virginia freedom fighters broke away from Virginia Democrat slave owners during the Civil War.

This week West Virginia has once again invited persecuted Virginia pro 2-A counties to come join their state.

Sounds like a winning plan!

Resolution 8 reads as follows:

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 8

(By Delegates Howell, Summers, Shott, Householder, C. Martin, Hott, Graves, Cadle, Barnhart, J. Jeffries, Maynard, Phillips, Foster, Hamrick, Steele, D. Jeffries, Wilson, Waxman, Bartlett, Paynter, Linville, Sypolt, Bibby, Hill, Ellington, Higginbotham, J. Kelly, Mandt, Pack, Dean and P. Martin)

[Introduced January 14, 2020]

Providing for an election to be had, pending approval of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a majority of qualified citizens voting upon the proposition prior to August 1, 2020, for the admission of certain counties and independent cities of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the State of West Virginia as constituent counties, under the provisions of Article VI, Section 11 of the Constitution of West Virginia

Whereas, The Legislature of West Virginia finds that in 1863, due to longstanding perceived attitudes of neglect for the interests of the citizens of Western Virginia, and a studied failure to address the differences which had grown between the counties of Western Virginia and the government at Richmond, the Commonwealth of Virginia was irretrievably divided, and the new State of West Virginia was formed; and

Whereas, Such division occurred as the Trans-Allegheny portions of Virginia perceived that they suffered under an inequitable measure of taxation by which they bore a disproportionate share of the tax burden; and

Whereas, That this perception was further compounded by the effects of a scheme of representation by which Trans-Allegheny Virginia was not allowed to have its proper and equitable share of representation in the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, That this arrangement arguably resulted in the tax dollars of Trans-Allegheny Virginia being used to enrich the Tidewater through internal improvements which did not benefit the people of Western Virginia, while the people of the Trans-Allegheny had little to no say in how their tax dollars were allocated; and

Whereas, Though this course led to an irreconcilable division, and the subsequent formation of West Virginia, yet, the longstanding peaceful cooperation between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia is a sign that such separation, undertaken even under the most challenging and onerous of circumstances, can, with the passage of time, yield lasting results which are beneficial to both sides; and

Whereas, In the intervening years, the same neglect for the interests of many of the remaining counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia has allegedly been evidenced by the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, Particularly, many citizens of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont contend that an inequitable measure of taxation exists by which they bear a disproportionate share of the present tax burden of the Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont also believe that, currently, a scheme of representation exists by which the citizens of Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont do not have a proper share of representation in the government at Richmond; and, consequently

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont believe that their tax dollars are used to enrich the Tidewater and Northern Virginia through internal improvements which do not benefit the people of these other parts of Virginia, while the people of these other parts of Virginia have little to no say in how their tax dollars are allocated; and

Whereas, In recent days, these tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the government at Richmond for the differences in certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, In the latest, and most evident, in this string of grievances, the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The Legislative body of West Virginia believes that this latest action defies the wise counsel which has come down to us in the august words of our common Virginia Founders: as the government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that tribune of liberty, Patrick Henry-who stated to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 that “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of a Signer of the Declaration and premier advocate of American independence, Richard Henry Lee-who stated in The Federal Farmer that “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that zealous guardian of our inherent rights, George Mason-who stated that “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of the declaimer of our independence and theoretician of our freedoms, Thomas Jefferson-who stated in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution, that “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms”; and

Whereas, The Boards of Supervisors of many Virginia counties and the Councils of many Virginia cities have recognized this dangerous departure from the doctrine of the Founders on the part of the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, These Boards of Supervisors and Councils have passed resolutions refusing to countenance what they affirm are unwarranted and unconstitutional measures by that government to infringe the firearm rights of Virginians; and

Whereas, The actions of the government at Richmond undertaken since the recent general election have, regrettably, resulted in unproductive contention and escalating a lamentable state of civic tension; and

Whereas, That, as has been proven in numerous instances, such as have been observed internationally in more recent times with the peaceful dissolutions of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union, and the creation of South Sudan, or, earlier in Virginia’s own history, with the formation of Kentucky, the peaceful partition of neighboring peoples can occur, and, is often very beneficial to both sides in reducing tensions and improving the tenor of discourse over ongoing political and societal differences; and

Whereas, Article VI, Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into, and become part of this state, with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state; and

Whereas, In a spirit of conciliation, the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia, under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution, specifically, with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed, and, we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitutions; and

Whereas, Providing that the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall give its assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity and ability to do so, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia.

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service