A strong majority of Democrats would cancel the 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump if it meant President Obama could serve another term, a new poll found.

Data provided to The Hill by the conservative polling outlet WPA Research found that 67 percent of Democrats would take a third term for Obama over a potential Clinton administration.

Only 28 percent said they’re ready to move on from the Obama White House, while 6 percent are undecided.

Obama is enjoying a surprisingly strong approval rating for a president serving out the final months of his second term.

A Washington Post-ABC News survey released this week found Obama’s net approval rating approaching 80 points in positive territory among Democrats. Former President Bill Clinton was at about 60 points positive within his own party at this point in 2000, while former President George W. Bush was under 40 with Republicans.

At the same time, a Gallup survey from April found Clinton’s net approval rating among Democrats hitting a new low. She had a 63-point net positive approval rating last November. That plummeted to only 36 points in April.

read more:

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/286105-major...

Views: 819

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

That's why we're voting for TRUMP!

Any poll that has -0 with high ratings are "fixed!"  This is another scare tactic (worked on me).  

We're thought for a long time that -0 would pull some sh*t on us...this might be the answer to why the GOP is so against Trump.  They were very good at helping -0 to secure both fraudulent elections.  And, the only way hillary will win the election is through the same liberal propaganda machine that gave us -0.  

GOD help us!  

                           OMG

All demonRATS are possessed and they do what their god Satan commands them to do.

I agree with you 100%.  Whatever they are supposed to be, they are not, and their god is satan.

My morning is ruined.  Ovomit is a tyrant.  Anyone sign the impeachment petition going around and around?! 

I've signed any petition I could find. This is seriously like a bad dream.

You mean spoiled spend thrift wants a third term so he can blow more money on his self.

Well now Debra- he is only setting an example for his Communist supporting chil-sheep-dren... But little does his cherished chil-sheep-dren know that Big Daddy Fraud is going to take all of their liberties and anything else they earn - the same as he is planning to steel it from his Constitutional Conservative supporting step chil-sheep-dren.. "Sarcastic but True..!" 

The Ignorant Sons Of Whores..!

For the takers, Democrats, what's not to like.  Free stuff is so much easier to acquire that stuff the rest of you boobs have to pay for!

Let's be simple and brief on this, shall we?

The liberal-libertine democrat sector is trying hard and harder to , accomplish  exactly that....with their herculean efforts to infuse down to the windpipe to the american public Hillary Clinton as for next president....after all the lady politician is just as toxic (or perhaps even more than) as Obama,....and certainly is worst,.... for with Hillary Clinton, there is an element / or factor of  -[ treason ] - that cannot be attached to Mr Obama ,...for the man is not son of this land,..... he is a foreign implant from Mombasa-Kenya occupying unconstitutionally and so illegally the presidential platform of our country.

Are we all clear on this?

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service