Mainstream media falsely refers to Somalian rapist Mohamed Harir Ayanle as a “Minneapolis man,” then later refuses to report whether or not he showed up for his court hearing

Image result for mohamed harir ayanle 22In September 2016, President Obama allowed a guy from Somali named Mohamed Harir Ayanle to enter the U.S.

Three months later, Ayanle raped a woman on a bus in Polk County, Minnesota.

However, the mainstream media falsely referred to him as a “Minneapolis man.”

This December 12, 2016 article from the St. Paul Pioneer Press is titled

“Minneapolis man charged with raping female passenger on intercity bus”

The first sentence of the article is

“A Minneapolis man could spend 30 years behind bars after being charged with raping a woman on Jefferson Lines bus on Friday afternoon.”

In the entire article, there is nothing to indicate that Ayanle is from anywhere other than Minnesota.

The article has no use of any word such as  “Somalia,” “Somali,” “Somalian,” “immigrant,” “migrant,” or any other such word, to indicate that Ayanle is from anywhere other than Minneapolis.

Likewise, this December 13, 2016 article from KSTP, the ABC News affiliate in St. Paul, Minnesota, is titled

“Minneapolis Man Accused of Raping Woman on Bus Heading to North Dakota”

Also, the first sentence of the article is

“A Minneapolis man has been charged after a woman said he raped her in the back of a bus.”

And again, the article has no use of any word such as “Somalia,” “Somali,” “Somalian,” “immigrant,” “migrant,” or any other such word, to indicate that Ayanle is from anywhere other than Minneapolis.

The news is supposed to report facts. It is a fact that Ayanle is Somalian. He is not a “Minneapolis man.” The mainstream media gave false information in its “news” reports.

read more:

https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2017/02/10/minneapolis-man/

Views: 636

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Why I like the idea of President Trump's "lists"

What is amazing is that the media even bothered to report on this crime in the first place.  They must not have known, that he was an "immigrant".

Usually, they don't even report on a crime committed by a non citizens.

This is one of many reasons why I only read the sports page and watch Fox News inc Tea Party. 

Rape of non muslime women is officially condoned and encouraged by islime, rape weakens the victim, women are scarred for life the most by this crime, thus rape makes raped women more likely to fall into "victims of submission" (=islime) ...through officially condoned rape, muslimes will own women of their host country ...and through that host country's women, muslimes can own that country (it is happening in Europe, especially Britain, Germany and Sweden).

They live in a world of fantasy and denial.

This scumbag should be living with the BO family or he should be shot whenever they catch up to his Camel Humping butt! This is what 1400 years of inbreeding does to people in this CULT! They are NOT Stable & never will be! They ALL need to be  put out of their misery's before they harm more GOOD CHRISTIANS"!! This is exactly the reason ALL good Americans'should have a concealed weapon on them when they leave their homes. This lady had EVERY REASON to put that maggot away to a pig farm! Shoot to KILL-I mean to NEUTRALIZE THE THREAT!! Happy Hunting!

This will keep happening until the left and the owners are brought down.  I think Trump's kid should start buying some TV stations.

Main stream media should be shamed to closure

"... Another thing about the media’s treatment of this incident raises huge red flags. The December 12, 2016 St. Paul Pioneer Press article ends with the following:

“Ayanle was released from custody Monday on a $5,000 bond on the condition that he does not leave Minnesota. His next court appearance is scheduled for Jan. 3.”

Why in the world did the judge in question think that Ayanle would stay in Minnesota, or show up for the January 3, 2017 court appearance?

The very bus that Ayanle was on when he committed the rape was headed to Grand Forks, North Dakota.

At the very time that Ayanle committed the rape, he was already headed out of Minnesota.

No rational person would expect Ayanle to return for the January 3, 2017 court appearance.

As I sit here writing this, it is now February 10, 2017. So it’s been more than five weeks since the January 3, 2017 court appearance was supposed to take place.

And yet this google search doesn’t show any new information about Ayanle. Instead, all we get are the articles about his initial arrest from December 2017. (2016?)

So where is Ayanle on this day of February 10, 2017?

Did he show up for the January 3, 2017 court appearance?

Did he flee Minnesota?

I can’t find any news articles to answer any of these questions. "

Of course this rapist fled Minnesota the muslims maybe crazy but they are not stupid 

Maybe they will wake up when that "Minnesota man" rapes them or their kids........and then again...maybe not.....they are so in to their destroy America agenda

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service