The Obama administration’s former Attorney General Loretta Lynch has made an impassioned video plea for more marching, blood and death on the streets – a video that was later posted on the Facebook page of Senate Democrats as “words of inspiration.”

The video is less than a minute long and begins by stating that people are experiencing “great fear and uncertainty,” with the unstated implication it is due to Donald Trump’s takeover of the White House.

Without offering any specifics, Lynch goes on to say that “our rights” are “being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back.”

But the strongest words come in a statement that seems to suggest the answer is street action that will inevitably turn bloody and deadly.

“I know that this is a time of great fear and uncertainty for so many people,” Lynch says. “I know it’s a time of concern for people, who see our rights being assailed, being trampled on and even being rolled back. I know that this is difficult, but I remind you that this has never been easy. We have always had to work to move this country forward to achieve the great ideals of our Founding Fathers.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/loretta-lynch-need-more-marching-blood-d...

Views: 1445

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

this lunatic needs to be put away This is just insane if she she is calling for death on the streets let it be hers

The Iranian Communist needs to be put away, along with her sugar daddy.

They can bring it on. Their own blood and death will be the result.

i have no problem with her blood on the streets

the Muslim are pure evil and hatred toward people and God period Loretta Lynch is no exception she is on it for the record and that's the reason why I said Obama and his administration should have been in Jail a long time a go, and if Donald Trump doesn't do anything about the Obama administration he is going to have a hard time in the white house

Are you claiming that Loretta Lynch is a Muslim?

Not by birth.  But she is in head and heart (or the lack of...).

Get off your soap box while you're still ahead Roberto.  It's not going to fly.

Colluding with Radical Muslims is Treason or as our Founding Fathers called them Tory. Making a pact with Radical Muslims won't buy anyone's freedom. Sort like playing with a Cobra, eventually they will strike and kill you because you aren't a Cobra.  Loretta could very well be a Muslim convert. Lying to deceive the Infidels is allowed in their cult.

That isn't the real problem - Treason is the problem.... hang the traitors and the muslims we can rid ourselves of easily by following the Rule of Law.


Here's a fact few understand or are aware of - and everyone needs to both understand it and start demanding the laws enforced.

#1. You have heard obama talk countless times the past 8 years about "immigrants" but SELDOM about "refugees"..... despite the FACT he's brought millions of "refugees" here....
And the truth is - once these "refugees" arrive - he stops calling them "refugees" and ILLEGALLY "grants" them citizenship status - when THE LAW says they were brought here as "refugees" AND MUST be returned to their own country.....

Aubrey Lee Mason




Sir Harry Rainey II




I S   T H E I R   P O S T E R   C H I L D


Lying still! Arrest her publicly alone g with Obama, Valerie Jarrett, and Michelle Obama, and George Soros. They are in violation of multiple parts of US 18.




Reporter Kicked Out Of Michelle Obama
Conference For Violating ‘Black Girl Code’

The Black Entertainment Television channel recently hosted a conference in south Florida for black women known as “Leading Women Defined,” which featured a casual conversation between former first lady Michelle Obama and former senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

But according to the New York Post’s Page Six, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was in attendance was booted from the remainder of the conference after she wrote an article about some of the comments Obama had made during the discussion.

Robin Givhan, a fashion critic and staff writer for The Washington Post, documented the highlights of the friendly chat between Obama and Jarrett.

Some of the highlights of the conversation included the former first lady’s thoughts on President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the Obamas prepared to leave the White House, the role she played during the 2008 election, her difficulty settling in as “the spouse” to the president, how she described her White House garden as a “subversive act” to garner trust with the public and her upcoming memoir. Of course Givhan also wrote about what Obama was wearing … after all, she is a fashion critic.

But following the publication of the article, according to Page Six, BET demanded Givhan leave the conference early amid claims that she had violated a “sacred space” by publishing the content of the conversation.

They also canceled a panel discussion that Givhan initially had been asked to moderate.

However, Page Six noted that BET’s claim that Obama’s discussion was “private” and not intended to be shared with anyone else outside the small gathering in attendance didn’t hold up to scrutiny given the fact that BET itself posted clips from the discussion on its site.

Furthermore, Jarrett also posted those clips on social media and told everyone to “tune in” to the network so they could hear what Obama had to say.

Shortly thereafter, the dispute descended into a sharp back-and-forth on social media between Givhan and others who were irked at what she had done, as can be seen on Givhan’s Twitter feed.

Several of her critics asserted that the conversation had been “off-the-record” — an assertion Givhan flatly denied — and one user claimed the reporter had “violated a sacred trust” between black women.

Another said what she had done was a “complete violation of journalistic ethics and Black girl code, all at once,” while still another asserted through a hashtag that Givhan was “#notoneofus,” as if she were being banished from the exclusive realm of accepted professional black women.

For their part, a BET representative told Page Six that Givhan had been “invited as a guest (not working press) to moderate a fashion panel,” and noted that her travel and lodging expenses had been paid for by the network.

“She was made aware that it was an intimate conversation in a sacred space of sisterhood and fellowship,” the rep added.

Neither Givhan nor representatives for Obama responded to requests for comment on the report from Page Six.

If the WaPo reporter really was instructed ahead of time that the conversation between Obama and Jarrett was “off the record” and a private affair, but published anyway, then BET was justified in booting her from the remainder of the conference — though the mean-spirited commentary she received on social media still crossed the line.

But if Givhan received no prior warning on the matter — and given the fact that BET itself published the conversation later — then this is just a major display of hypocrisy and unnecessary infighting.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service