Old News 2015- Liberals Sign Petition to Ban American Flag and Issue New Design for the New World Order! Media analyst Mark Dice asked beachgoers in San Diego to sign a petition he said would result in issuing a new American flag for a "New World Order" because the current one is offensive to some immigrants and is associated with imperialism and racism.

 Liberals Sign Petition to Ban the American Flag!!!- YouTube


Views: 51

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This is a seditious act... our National Flag is a direct symbol of our Sovereignty... there are laws protecting it from such garbage.. laws which have been seriously neglected and openly held in disdain by a corrupt Judiciary and legal system.. It is time to make America Great Again that that begins by protecting its Symbols from being disparaged and abused.

It is time to honor and protect our National Symbols... our Flag and National Anthem.  Those who are unwilling to do so or attack them need to be clearly labeled as TRAITORS and dealt with using our sedition and espionage laws. 

It is past time that we hold the JUDICIARY responsible for their bad conduct.. their ignoring of hundreds of years of legal precedent and patriotism that is embodied in many of our laws protecting our National Symbols and heritage.  Disbar the BASTARDS, and send them packing ... to any place other than the US where they can sow their discord and treason... outside of the US and its Constitutional protections.

Well honey its their little freedom of speech and I think they are idiots..!

Freedom of speech doesn't give one carte blanch to do or say anything one likes... one can not incite riot, engage in sedition (speech calling or designed to overthrow of the government.) or speech that endangers the public, is a nuisance (excessively loud or grossly offensive), or violates commonly held community standards for obscenity.

The problem is that the left would have us believe anything they do is protected speech... but just try mimicking their supposed acts of free speech as a conservative and see what happens.  Call for public violence, incite a riot and see what happens.  Demand the crowds over throw the government ... burn the police station down or overrun the court house and see what happens.  Tare down government property or overturn a few statutes as a conservative and see what happens... try defending your actions as a matter of free speech.

27% Of Democrats and Republicans Believe Ted Cruz Is A American...LMAO




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert


OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service