Law Professor Suggests GPS Trackers For Refugees (Instead Of Immigration Ban)

Image result for ankle bracelets for refugeesSeemingly taking a page out of Europe's idiotic government decisions, George Washington University Law Professor John Banzhaf is urging President Trump to go slow on appealing a court's rejection of the administration's travel ban and instead, follow Germany's example and put GPS ankle bracelets on visitors from the seven targeted nations until a final decision is made.

As The Washington Examiner reports, a prominent legal expert said that the administration should wait to appeal until Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch gets to the court, giving Trump a 5-4 majority and in the meantime put the tracking devices on any refugee or visitor.

"Going to the Supreme Court now could result in a widely predicted 4-4 decision," warned George Washington University Law Professor John Banzhaf. 

Wait instead, he urged, and in the meantime look to Germany's model of using trackers on those it suspects of having terror ties — not all refugees. 

"Imposing such conditions on admission is fully consistent with 8 USC 1182(f) which expressly gives the president the authority to 'impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.' It is also more likely to be upheld since it is far less objectionable than a total ban," he said. 

Ankle bracelets are currently widely used by law enforcement and immigration agencies and Banzhaf suggested that it can be expanded and would be accepted by the nation. 

"There have now been several major terrorist incidents in which authorities pointed out that they were suspicious of the perpetrator, but did not have sufficient information to arrest him, nor the vast resources necessary to provide effective surveillance of everyone under suspicion. GPS systems incorporated in ankle bracelets permit one agent to track hundreds of suspects in real time, and provide computer generated alerts if he goes anywhere suspicious (e.g., near a nuclear power plant), meets with other persons likewise wearing ankle monitors," he said.

We look forward to hearing the uproar from the liberal intelligentsia regarding invading the privacy of potential terrorists.

read more:

Views: 379

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They probably haven't had their "day in court" yet.  I suspect these morons consider having their names on this list a "Badge of Honor".

They wouldn't be so proud, if they spent a few years in Jail for their evil deeds.  Until we have real Law & Order, this will continue.

is this law professor willing to be charged as an accessory for any crimes that any illegal aliens commit against americans

I doubt this would work  First they will say for religious reasons they can not wear such evil things.  Second they will take them off no matter what.  Not a good idea.

OH MY Frank........what big feet you have.   But then again, that COULD be my uncle Maynard....he had the horrible habit of putting plaids and stripes together  ;o))

This is really stupid.  Let's put a chip in their neck like I do my dog.  Same deal.

...........or a bullet. Then we'd know where they are ........all the time.


Report: Dems Think Muslims Are Worse Off In the U.S. Than Christian...

Most voters agree that Christians living in the Muslim world are fiercely persecuted for their faith.

Read More »

So many ways to CHEAT on this...  

just keep them out. At least until they can be properly VETTED!  If this nnsense continues, they will want DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY!  And some stupid 'Federal Judge' will GRANT it to them!




Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service