Law Professor Suggests GPS Trackers For Refugees (Instead Of Immigration Ban)

Image result for ankle bracelets for refugeesSeemingly taking a page out of Europe's idiotic government decisions, George Washington University Law Professor John Banzhaf is urging President Trump to go slow on appealing a court's rejection of the administration's travel ban and instead, follow Germany's example and put GPS ankle bracelets on visitors from the seven targeted nations until a final decision is made.

As The Washington Examiner reports, a prominent legal expert said that the administration should wait to appeal until Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch gets to the court, giving Trump a 5-4 majority and in the meantime put the tracking devices on any refugee or visitor.

"Going to the Supreme Court now could result in a widely predicted 4-4 decision," warned George Washington University Law Professor John Banzhaf. 

Wait instead, he urged, and in the meantime look to Germany's model of using trackers on those it suspects of having terror ties — not all refugees. 

"Imposing such conditions on admission is fully consistent with 8 USC 1182(f) which expressly gives the president the authority to 'impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.' It is also more likely to be upheld since it is far less objectionable than a total ban," he said. 

Ankle bracelets are currently widely used by law enforcement and immigration agencies and Banzhaf suggested that it can be expanded and would be accepted by the nation. 

"There have now been several major terrorist incidents in which authorities pointed out that they were suspicious of the perpetrator, but did not have sufficient information to arrest him, nor the vast resources necessary to provide effective surveillance of everyone under suspicion. GPS systems incorporated in ankle bracelets permit one agent to track hundreds of suspects in real time, and provide computer generated alerts if he goes anywhere suspicious (e.g., near a nuclear power plant), meets with other persons likewise wearing ankle monitors," he said.

We look forward to hearing the uproar from the liberal intelligentsia regarding invading the privacy of potential terrorists.

read more:

Views: 382

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm STILL laughing!!!

It is interesting to get your posts but frustrating as well, they still cannot be shared on facebook,

not good enough i want them out of here

I agree. Get rid of them. - I wonder why Trump didn't sign an executive order for religious freedom Why does he protect the LGBTQ? Get rid of them, too! Certainly don't protect them, President Trump!

Why should he need to sign an EO for religious freedom.......the First Amendment should cover it all.

Hell no, kick illegals and Obamas refugees out and put the tracker on the professor. Better yet kick out exile the professor.

You have some great ideas!!!    We need you working for Sessions, as soon as the Libs get through dragging their feet, squealing and kicking, and get him into Office.

We have enough trash in our streets now, why spend millions of dollars to provide more? if they will commit crimes, why would they not just remove the bracelet and toss then away?

Absolutely correct.  One of my previous contracts was with a company that repaired the tracking ankle bracelets that currently are used by the courts.  By and large, the most common fault with the units was damage to the straps and thus to the switches that monitor the bracelet's position on the person.  

Yes, the biggest problem was that the offender just cut the bracelet or ripped it out of the plastic case, tossed the tracker to the side, and went on about his "business" of robbery, vandalism, or whatever "job" his criminal specialty provided.

There is nothing to keep the tagged "refugees" from doing the same thing and, friends, there is not a large enough police force to keep track of them nor is there enough jail space to incarcerate them.  
The only answer is expulsion from our country and refusal to admit any further of the so-called refugees without very close examination of the person(s) in question.

Come on people get real, they want you except this technology for the refugee and later for you. I ain't wearing no bracelet or chip or anything else, to hell with govt I belong to Jesus Christ not a subject of any govt. These academia just have to stsnd up and show the world how smart they are, not. Always some rule or some technology they want you to comply with and exempt themselves. This shit is ridiculous.

We've given enough to these people. Just use the laws and get them out of the country!

The President has the authority to "impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate." Yeah, he's trying to do that, by keeping them out in the first place. Fight the courts who don't want to follow the order, and put the immigration ban back into effect. Case closed.

God Bless Donald Trump and God Bless America!




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service