Judicial Watch Files Ethics Complaint Against Adam Schiff: ‘We Have Info Schiff Disclosed Classified Information’ (VIDEO)

Today, Judicial Watch filed an ethics complaint against Ranking Member of the Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff and Rep. Jackie Speier for violating House ethics rules.

Via Judicial Watch:

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today sent a hand-delivered letter to the chairman and co-chairman of the House Office of Congressional Ethics calling for an investigation into whether Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Jackie Speier (D-CA) “disclosed classified information to the public in violation of House ethics rules.”

Citing the ethics complaints filed against House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) charging that he “may have made unauthorized disclosures of classified information, in violation of House Rules, regulations, or other standards of conduct,” Judicial Watch wrote:

If the standard for filing a complaint or opening an ethics investigation is that a member has commented publicly on matters that touch on classified information, but the member does not reveal the source of his or her information, then the complaints against Chairman Nunes are incomplete insofar as they target only Nunes. At least two other members of the House Intelligence Committee have made comments about classified material that raise more directly the very same concerns raised against Chairman Nunes because they appear to confirm classified information contained in leaked intelligence community intercepts.


Views: 42

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Everyone knows this bogus investigation is simply an attempt by the devious DEMs to keep a negative cloud hanging over the Trump administration. To the hack, Rep. Adam Schiff, please sit down and STFU!!

It is time for AG Session's to use his authority... too direct an immediate investigation into Rep. Schiff's alleged illegal release of classified information... It is time for Pres. Trump to " faithfully execute the Office of President... and too... take care that the Laws be faithfully executed...", by focusing on those violations of the law coming out of the halls of Congress and those agents of the swamp in DC,  who apparently believe they are above the law..

One can not drain the swamp if they are unwilling to prosecute violations of the law... it is time too apply the same pressure Trump is using on Syria, Korea and ISIS to those lawless elements operating as the representatives of the people.  I continue to be disappointed in Pres. Trump's weak kneed approach to taking down the Swamp and those in it. 

Where's the street fighter we elected?  I thought we were hiring a Teddy Roosevelt or Andrew Jackson, not a Jimmy Carter...as President. If Sessions and Comey are unwilling to FOCUS their resources on CLEANING UP THE GOVERNMENT then let them resign or Pres. Trump needs to publicly fire them...  Not one... not a single criminal act, by a host of subjects, has been pursued to its conclusion... Where are the indictments and trials Pres. Trump?  It takes more than tweets, to Drain a Swamp.


By the way disclosing classified information to the President of the United States, in the course of one's duty,  is not a violation of the law... Especially, when it is done for the purposes of exposing lawless conduct or for national security reasons.  Both, reasons apply to the Nunes case, as the leaking of classified intercepts, regarding conversations with foreign powers, is both illegal and of national security interest.

They've done it again -- Democrats caught in their own trap
Congressional Democrats aren't like their more reserved Republican counterparts.

When Democrats detect the slightest hint of scandal among their foes, they attack -- it's like blood in the water to them. They might want to be more cautious next time.

Their latest feeding frenzy -- an "ethics probe" meant to neutralized this rising GOP star -- could soon have them eating two of their own ...


Legal beagle declares war on 'Deep State'

Now would be a good time for Susan Rice to lawyer up.

This powerful public-interest legal firm isn't amused by what it's calling "an orchestrated conspiracy" by government officials who used their positions and power to spy on political enemies.

For now, they've locked in on Rice and the NSA, but they show no interest in stopping there ...


So far, the war seems more like a mutual admiration society... as bipartisanship continues to be the theme of the GOP...

The GOP seems to be remiss in understanding... There can be no bipartisanship where one side is attempting to torpedo the other; while, intending on taking no prisoners.  The GOP seems oblivious to the hate filled rhetoric and actions of the Democrat Party. They appear to be masochist, looking for more pain, rather than relief.

It is time for Trump to man up... where is the Bull in the China closet we elected?  How can Trump drain the swamp if he is up to his neck in the swamp?  Actions speak louder than words and Congressional investigations are a complete waste of time... they never result in indictments or accountability.

Patience, my friend.

 I was wanting to check this out, I am going to send it to my dad, because Judicial Watch, when are they going to go after Hillary Clinton for trying to rig the 2016 Election through violence ?





Reporter Kicked Out Of Michelle Obama
Conference For Violating ‘Black Girl Code’

The Black Entertainment Television channel recently hosted a conference in south Florida for black women known as “Leading Women Defined,” which featured a casual conversation between former first lady Michelle Obama and former senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

But according to the New York Post’s Page Six, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was in attendance was booted from the remainder of the conference after she wrote an article about some of the comments Obama had made during the discussion.

Robin Givhan, a fashion critic and staff writer for The Washington Post, documented the highlights of the friendly chat between Obama and Jarrett.

Some of the highlights of the conversation included the former first lady’s thoughts on President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the Obamas prepared to leave the White House, the role she played during the 2008 election, her difficulty settling in as “the spouse” to the president, how she described her White House garden as a “subversive act” to garner trust with the public and her upcoming memoir. Of course Givhan also wrote about what Obama was wearing … after all, she is a fashion critic.

But following the publication of the article, according to Page Six, BET demanded Givhan leave the conference early amid claims that she had violated a “sacred space” by publishing the content of the conversation.

They also canceled a panel discussion that Givhan initially had been asked to moderate.

However, Page Six noted that BET’s claim that Obama’s discussion was “private” and not intended to be shared with anyone else outside the small gathering in attendance didn’t hold up to scrutiny given the fact that BET itself posted clips from the discussion on its site.

Furthermore, Jarrett also posted those clips on social media and told everyone to “tune in” to the network so they could hear what Obama had to say.

Shortly thereafter, the dispute descended into a sharp back-and-forth on social media between Givhan and others who were irked at what she had done, as can be seen on Givhan’s Twitter feed.

Several of her critics asserted that the conversation had been “off-the-record” — an assertion Givhan flatly denied — and one user claimed the reporter had “violated a sacred trust” between black women.

Another said what she had done was a “complete violation of journalistic ethics and Black girl code, all at once,” while still another asserted through a hashtag that Givhan was “#notoneofus,” as if she were being banished from the exclusive realm of accepted professional black women.

For their part, a BET representative told Page Six that Givhan had been “invited as a guest (not working press) to moderate a fashion panel,” and noted that her travel and lodging expenses had been paid for by the network.

“She was made aware that it was an intimate conversation in a sacred space of sisterhood and fellowship,” the rep added.

Neither Givhan nor representatives for Obama responded to requests for comment on the report from Page Six.

If the WaPo reporter really was instructed ahead of time that the conversation between Obama and Jarrett was “off the record” and a private affair, but published anyway, then BET was justified in booting her from the remainder of the conference — though the mean-spirited commentary she received on social media still crossed the line.

But if Givhan received no prior warning on the matter — and given the fact that BET itself published the conversation later — then this is just a major display of hypocrisy and unnecessary infighting.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service