Judge Stops Trump’s Border Wall Construction in California At Last Minute

 An Obama-appointed judge blocked President Trump from building sections of his border wall with money secured under his declaration of a national emergency.

 U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr., who was appointed by Obama in 2014, immediately halted President Trump’s efforts to redirect military-designated funds for wall construction.

 Judge Gilliam’s order applies to two projects that were scheduled to begin on Saturday and involved replacing 51 miles of fence in two areas on the US-Mexico border.

CNBC reports: Gilliam issued the ruling after hearing arguments last week in two cases. California and 19 other states brought one lawsuit; the Sierra Club and a coalition of communities along the border brought the other.

 His ruling was the first of several lawsuits against Trump’s controversial decision to bypass the normal appropriations process to pay for his long-sought wall.

President Donald Trump speaks during an inspection of border wall prototypes in San Diego, California on March 13, 2018

 “The position that when Congress declines the Executive’s request to appropriate funds, the Executive nonetheless may simply find a way to spend those funds ‘without Congress’ does not square with fundamental separation of powers principles dating back to the earliest days of our Republic,” the judge wrote in granting a temporary injunction to stop construction.

 At stake is billions of dollars that would allow Trump to make progress in a signature campaign promise heading into his campaign for a second term.

 Trump declared a national emergency in February after losing a fight with the Democratic-led House over fully paying for the wall that led to a 35-day government shutdown. As a compromise on border and immigration enforcement, Congress set aside $1.375 billion to extend or replace existing barriers in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley, the busiest corridor for illegal crossings.

 Trump grudgingly accepted the money, but he declared the emergency to siphon money from other government accounts because he wanted to spend $8 billion on wall construction. The funds include $3.6 billion from military construction funds, $2.5 billion from Defense Department counter drug activities and $600 million from the Treasury Department’s asset forfeiture fund.

 The president’s adversaries say the emergency declaration was an illegal attempt to ignore Congress, which authorized far less wall spending than Trump wanted.

“We welcome the court’s decision to block Trump’s attempts to sidestep Congress to build deadly walls that would hurt communities living at the border, endanger wildlife, and have damaging impacts on the environment,” said Andrea Guerrero, a member of the Southern Border Communities Coalition.

 The administration said Trump was protecting national security as unprecedented numbers of Central American asylum-seeking families arrive at the U.S. border.

The courtroom showdowns come amid a flurry of activity to accelerate wall construction.


Views: 55

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

TIme to pull an Andrew Jackson... too, tell the Judge his court order is not law nor does it have the power to tell the Executive Branch what it can or can not do... There are three Branches of Government and the judiciary is supposed to be the WEAKEST of them all... the decisions of the lower courts are not Constitutionally able to bind the Executive as the Lower/inferior Courts don't have jurisdiction to hear cases involving the Executive.  

Article 3, Section 2, Clause 2

"In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make."

The US SUPREME COURT is the ONLY COURT with the Jurisdiction to hear cases between States and ministers and consuls of the United States Federal Government.  No other court has original jurisdiction... the authority to act in such cases.  PERIOD.  It is time that the President and DOJ inform the inferior courts that they have no Constitutional jurisdiction to hear cases between States and Executive branch ministers or consuls.

Pres. Trump needs to inform the Public of his decision to return Constitutional jurisdiction to the Federal Judiciary... by informing the lower courts of their jurisdictional limits... that they have no standing to hear cases where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction. ... the only Constitutional jurisdiction to act.

That is so cute the way you jump right in there...:)

Always up and ready to please...

Really Ronald, all ways ready to please, here ya go have fun...:)


Tif ...

I realize that you and Hank have different views on life and relationships... this may be your idea of a dream come true but it isn't mine.  I'll pass on this one and let you enjoy the fruit of your labor with this wale of a dream.

Heck... invite Hank along and make it three to go... I hear the California Border and Tiajuana have some very interesting entertainment that you may enjoy... given your idea of what a dream is... you should fit right in.

 I believe the view was for you.

Not my post... or idea of a dream... hardly my view. 

 The political gesture, was made a funny toward you.




Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Gary VarvelPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


SICK: Leprosy On The Rise In Los Angeles 

Ahh, the joys of open borders and Democrat leadership.

California is not just a public toilet but now there is evidence that leprosy is on the rise in Los Angeles County.

Barack Obama changed US law in 2016 and allowed immigrants with blistering STDs and leprosy to migrate to the US.

Medscape reported:

Leprosy, also known as Hansen’s disease, is rarely seen in the United States, but cases continue to emerge in Los Angeles County, a new report says.

“Hansen’s disease still exists, and we need to educate medical students and physicians,” coauthor Dr. Maria Teresa Ochoa from Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, told Reuters Health by email.

Dr. Ochoa and colleagues identified 187 patients with the disease in a review of medical records from their leprosy clinic spanning 1973 to 2018. Most patients were Latino, originating from Mexico, and they experienced a median delay in diagnosis of more than three years, the team reports JAMA Dermatology, online August 7.

Multibacillary leprosy (MB) cases outnumbered paucibacillary leprosy (PB) cases by nearly eight to one (88.6% vs. 11.4%, respectively), and Latino patients were more likely than non-Latino patients to have MB, as were patients from Central or South America (versus other regions).

Most patients (80.7%) received multidrug therapy, and most (92.6%) received antibiotics for more than two years, especially if they had MB.

Only about half of patients (56.7%) had World Health Organization (WHO) grade 0 disability (no signs or symptoms suggestive of leprosy or disability) at the one-year follow-up, whereas 16.0% had grade 1 disability (loss of protective sensation) and 26.2% had grade 2 disability (visible deformity) at the last follow-up.

Among the patients who lost protective sensation, 87.7% (50/57) did not regain it following therapy.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service