Judge Rules School Girls Must Accept Transgender Boys In Their Locker Rooms


A federal judge has ruled boys have a Constitutional right to use girls’ rest rooms and showers if they feel like it, and vice versa.

 U.S. District Court Judge Marco Hernandez in Oregon did offer an alternative, however: Parents who object to boys using girls’ showers and rest rooms with their daughters can take them out of the schools for which their tax dollars fund.

 His ruling failed to address the fact that if they home-school or enroll them in a private school, as do many parents with such concerns, they must not only pay for their local public school through their taxes but also for an expensive second round of costs.

It is within Parent Plaintiffs’ right to remove their children from Dallas [Oregon] High School if they disapprove of transgender student access to facilities,” the judge said.

Once the parents have chosen to send their children to school … their liberty interest in their children’s education is severely diminished.”

 WND report: His ruling, however, conflicts with President Trump’s rescinding of an Obama administration guidance letter directing schools that want to continue to receive federal funding to let transgender students use facilities that correspond with their “gender identity.”

https://mobile.wnd.com/2018/07/judge-forces-high-schoolers-to-share...

 Judge Hernandez, who was appointed by Obama, rejected the claims from Parents for Privacy, Kris Golly, Jon Golly, Lindsey Golly, Nicole Lille, Melissa Gregory and Parents Rights in Education against the Dallas School District No. 2 and the Oregon Department of Education.

The judge previously allowed a claim for loss of companionship in a pet case to go to trial.

 The underlying foundation for the argument for opening gender-specific facilities in public schools is a new interpretation of the 1972 Title IX law, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity. The Obama administration insisted Congress meant “gender identity” when it used the term “sex.”

The judge defined “sex” as “processes that lead to or denote male or female.”

He said such a characteristic is “assigned” at birth.

But “gender” is a person’s “subjective, deep-core sense of self as being a particular gender.”

 A “transgender boy is therefore a person who has a lasting, persistent male gender identity, though that person’s sex was determined to be female at birth.”

 In the Dallas district, an unidentified female student submitted such a claim to be a boy, and the school developed a plan to allow her to use the boys’ facilities.

The parents then objected.

 The judge, who insisted on calling her “he,” discounted all claims the other students had to privacy, even though they, according to the judge’s ruling, say they experienced “embarrassment, humiliation, anxiety, intimidation, fear, apprehension and stress.”

 The principal, according to the judge, “informed them that all facilities may be used by any student regardless of biological sex.”

 The judge criticized Trump’s reversal of Obama’s instructions to school districts for not offering “guidance” on the issue.

 The same issue is making its way through the court systems in multiple other jurisdictions, and at some point, the U.S. Supreme Court likely will be asked to step in.

 In this case, the judge said, he wasn’t convinced that the students had a “fundamental right to privacy cognizable under the 14th Amendment.”

 The students, he said, have no “fundamental privacy right to not share school restrooms, lockers, and showers with transgender students.”

 For the school to force them to “see or be seen by someone of the opposite biological sex while either are undressing or performing bodily functions in a restroom, shower, or locker room does not give rise to a constitutional violation.”

https://yournewswire.com/obama-judge-high-school-girls-boys-locker-...

Views: 27

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 This is not going to go well for this Judge.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

CRIME!! -> Clinton Nightmare! Chief Financial Officer Of Clinton Foundation Turns Government Informant On Crime Family

Donations to the Clinton Foundation plummeted by 90% over a three-year period since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to President Donald Trump.

But that may be the least of the her worries.

John Solomon from The Hill dropped another bombshell that will keep the Clintons up at night.

The former Chief Financial Officer of the Clinton Foundation has turned on the crime family and is now working as a government informant.

This could spell doom for the Clinton Crime Family.

American Thinker reported:

John Solomon of The Hill reveals the story that has been percolating for a long time but kept tightly under wraps – because that is what serious prosecutors do, especially when grand juries are poring over evidence and issuing indictments that remain sealed until the right moment comes. The trigger for the story coming out now probably is a House subcommittee hearing scheduled next week by Mark Meadows, chair of the House Freedom Caucus, while the GOP still can set the agenda of House hearings.

[A] GOP-led congressional subcommittee, led by Rep. Mark Meadows (N.C.), is planning to hold a hearing next week to review the work of John Huber, the special U.S attorney named a year ago to investigate all things Clinton.

It turns out that whistleblowers inside and outside the Clinton Foundation have amassed “6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.” Among that evidence can be found:

Those reviews flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and “quid pro quo” promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.

The submission also cites an interview its investigators conducted with Andrew Kessel that quotes the foundation’s longtime chief financial officer as saying he was unable to stop former President Clinton from “commingling” personal business and charitable activities inside the foundation and that he “knows where all the bodies are buried.”

Their own investigation! That’s hard to put down as politically motivated.

Having the chief financial officer of the Clinton Foundation turn informant is a nightmare for the Clintons. The CFO has to process all the cash, and because that person usually is on the hook for any criminal violations, there is ample incentive to turn state’s evidence.

That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.

In addition to the IRS, the firm’s partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service