Judge Jeanine notes that Obama has made the case that he does not have the authority that he has now somehow discovered on at least a dozen occasions and plays some video to support her argument. Obama clearly is saying, as most of us have heard repeatedly that if he were to do what he has now done it would be a violation of the law and the Constitution.
She then plays a clip of his flip flopping on the issue in his announcement speech, a complete one-eighty in which he now claims he is within his legal authority. He may be within his authority in the regard that people will do as he says in spite of its illegality, but he is not within his legal authority.
Judge Pirro is familiar with the Constitution and with prosecutorial discretion and this is not what either of them look like.
She reminds Obama that he represents only one third of the “separate but equal branches” of government and one with a high negative public opinion.
She congratulates Obama on the results of his mafia-style thuggery as accomplishing the objective of forcing Republicans into action of some type.
Judge Pirro points to the hypocrisy of the Obama claims that we can no longer afford to exclude these squatters in our country and asks what can we afford? She notes how he claims they won’t be eligible for his socialized medicine but that federal law requires anyone who shows up at a hospital to be treated. Who is going to pay that bill?
As to the 47 million on food stamps in America, she asks if it is really a wise decision to add to the roles.
She also raises the issue of identity crime surging as illegals attempt to prove that they have been here long enough to meet the required qualification period. Then again, it’s quite likely that there will be no vetting or verification whatsoever, with every word taken as the absolute truth, just as was done with Central American border crashers. There’s just no way to accurately verify all claims and while illegals might break our laws, are we cynical enough to believe they might actually lie to us to stay here?
she'd make a wonderful attorney general! fearless.
What an excellent idea. There would be some hope for the American Republic, then. She is some top-notch citizen; knows precisely what this country is all about.
Was, all about.
Part of the plan. Keep rejecting the laws of the land as if they are insignificant and eventually they will be. His mission to destroy EVERY ASPECT of American life is well along. Why it has been allowed to get this far is beyond me which leads me to suspect that our Congress is loaded with Communist Sleepers in both parties.
and almost verbatim in great parts, Obama's legal "team" is using AG opinions and other writings within state issues for which their local rules/laws were never in line with actual Federal law and therefore, illegal and un-constitutional "opinions" and "rulings" from sanctuary cities planned to be used at the "state" level to validate/document, then slowly these have "funneled" into law reviews and findlaw and other legal pub's since 2009 and picked up and used by other communities (through administrative hearings and/or civic settlements without being heard by any civil/criminal court(s)). I remember fax alerts being sent out re AG opinions on all sorts of litigation down to AZ and NM and NV and other locations re water rights and interstate transportation and maritime and employment verification questions and union negotiation issues as well as immigrant status issues and local vs. Federal concerns on all of these issues from CA.
Since, you keep hearing these same issues being dealt with across the nation in many states (some hadn't succumbed) - and being addressed identically to the initial screwed up rules/laws you were watching being manipulated into place back in CA. When you listen to "legal experts" on tv etc, they are repeating all this as valid law too. Now - the President uses the exact same rhetoric as law that originated out of sanctuary cities that were going against immigration law to begin with.
I think you are right, ...part of the plan.
He is setting a precedence for the next president. He must be pretty certain that it would be a democrat, surely the fraud already started..... and look at all the new democrats we have. This louse never went to Harvard or Columbia, and he never got UBL either!
She is always spot on. I admire her for saying the truth no fear. Something this country needs so many Awesome Judge and women.
He's got to go!
DID AL SHARPTON KILL ROOKIE COP HARRY CRIST JR.? THE 28 YEAR OLD ROOKIE CHARGED WITH RAPE IN THE TAWANA BRAWLEY HOAX DESPONDENT THAT HIS FIANCE LEFT HIM BASED ON FALSE ALLEGATIONS TOOK HIS OWN LIFE. HIS BLOOD IS ON AL SHARPTON'S HANDS AND JUSTICE WAS NEVER SERVED. NO JUSTICE NO PEACE FOR WHO?
Sad part is, too many "Americans" don't understand the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Declaration of Independence, hell most don't even know about the three branches of government and how they are suppose to work. If you don't know what a Constitutional Republic is then how the hell are you going to defend it, and vote like you knew what the hell you were doing. This is a Republic, a government "of the people, for the people and BY the people" said many years ago by a man a hell of a lot smarter than I am. Yet, we going to the polls and screw it up every time.