Jeb Bush Praises Illegal Immigrants as 'Risk Takers,' Defends Common Core

 

In a speech Friday, Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush praised illegal immigrants as "risk takers" who embody the entrepreneurial spirit of America and doubled down on his defense of Common Core.

 

According to the Miami-Herald, Bush made his remarks in front of business leaders in Florida.

 

“People who come here legally and illegally are the risk takers,” Bush reportedly said. “If you’re living in a rural area of Guatemala and you come, you’re a bigger risk taker than those who stay,” he added. 

 

Of course, the first action of those who come to the country illegally is breaking the law. 

 

Bush also said he was the "Eat Your Broccoli Governor" and implied he would be telling conservatives to embrace policies like amnesty and Common Core, which is reminiscent of former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman's all-in approach to global warming during his failed 2012 presidential campaign.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/03/21/Jeb-Bush-Praises...

Views: 497

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

You are correct on two points,, We do in fact have enough idiocy in this nation,,And common core is nothing short of indoctrination,, No one that Im aware of said they would vote for Jeb,, And where in the hell do u get off calling them Nazis?? Who would you prefer?? Or better yet, have you taken your meds?? Nazi is a mean ass thing to say about anyone. Get off the phone.

COMMON CORE IS TRASH AND SO IS ANYONE WHO DEFENDS IT !!!

Brilliant analysis, simply brilliant.  Typical Bush logic!

Similarly, bank robbers, murders, rapists, ALL lawbreakers are "risk takers".  Come to think of, it, "ILLEGALS" are lawbreakers!

 

It's to bad all the apples are bad.

This is obviously a case where experience doesn't count.  No more Bushes.

THIS "MODERATE"  R.I.N.O.   A**HOLE  WILL NEVER GET ELECTED BECAUSE WE TRUE CONSERVATIVES WILL NEVER VOTE FOR A "MODERATE" OR "R.I.N.O.".....IF THE GOP IS STUPID ENOUGH TO OFFER EITHER CHRIS CHRISTIE OR JEB BUSH,  WE CONSERVATIVES WILL VOTE FOR A "WRITE IN CANDIDATE".....AND THIS WILL SPLIT THE REPUBLICAN VOTE AND THE DEMOCRATS WILL WIN ANOTHER ELECTION !!!!!!!....THERE ARE MANY EXCELLENT CANDIDATES THAT THE GOP CAN SUPPORT AND NOMINATE.....CHRISTIE AND BUSH ARE BOTH LOSERS  AND WE WILL NOT SUPPORT OR VOTE FOR THEM !!!!!!!.....WE WANT A "TEA PARTY CANDIDATE" !!!!!.....AND ONE MORE THING...."ABSOLUTELY NO AMNESTY" ...EVER !!!!!!....DEPORT ALL THESE CRIMINAL INVADERS" !!!!!!!    TO HELL WITH BUSH AND CHRISTIE !!!!!!!.....THE GOP IS GOING TO COMMIT FINAL SUICIDE !!!

I think he was the eat sh$t governor   go off in the sunset you fake republican

JEB BUSH MAY BE A NICE GUY HOWEVER HIS IDEAS ARE WRONG FOR OUR COUNTRY. AS FOR IMMIGRATION IN MY OPINION HE HAS ALWAYS COME AT THIS FROM A SLANTED VIEW BECAUSE HE IS MARRIED TO A LADY FROM THE OTHERSIDE OF THE BOARDER. OH! SURE WHEN SOMEONE LIKE MYSELF DARES TO SAY THIS WE OF COURSE ARE RACIST. THE FACT IS I LIKE HIS WIFE AND THINK SHE IS AN OK PERSON HOWEVER ILLEGAL IS ILLEGAL

Amen Richard!

Nice guys are NOT nice.

True Mary Ann...Bush family is NOT as innocent as people believe.  In fact it was G.H.W. Bush #41 who first spoke of New World Order.  He also has attended Bilderberg meetings...and maybe George W. as well.  NO JEB BUSH IN 2016.....HE WOULD NEVER WIN!   The only reason the DNC wants Jeb Bush to run is they know he could not defeat Hillary!  I doubt Jeb would even win the GOP nomination!  

What risk?     They are invited here and then are paid to stay!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service