Israel Constitutional Declaration Of Independence

 Israel does not have a written constitution, even though according to the Proclamation of Independence a constituent assembly should have prepared a constitution by October 1, 1948.

 The Khazar Jews Rothschild Applies a Cashless System by Force, to enslave the Israelite's of Moses. To control Israel by deception.

La Declaración de Independencia de Israel tuvo lugar en el Museo de Arte
de Tel Aviv, en el Boulevar Rotchschild, el dia 14 de mayo de 1948.
Coincidiendo con la finalización legal del Mandato Británico de
Palestina programado para el día 15 a las cero horas.

 You should understand the Corruption of Israel's Loyalty Law being Forced into the US Government. This Israel Loyalty Law was built by the Rothschild Banking. To further more control over the house, in the US Congressional System.

Views: 203

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Let the battle begin....:)

This is not a discussion I would want to get into on an internet blog.  Too convoluted and controversial.   Yes, there are allot of hidden truths that need to be revealed (exposed), but right now with the condition that the world is in, it would only fuel division and hatred.  We can discuss it after the tribulation.

Come on JC, We can discuss it after the tribulation....:) I got a better idea, burn the banks baby...:)

President Trump is working on a better idea.  I'll let him handle it.

Really, President Trump is working on a better idea, Hmm? I looked around what is it...:)

Violence in the streets will only result in more chaos, suffering and greater personal harm to the American people...  We must not engage it revolution unless it is brought to us... in the form of arms confiscation and or the federalizing of wages and commercial activity.... government ownership of the means of production.

OH,Oh by the way, remember that blog about the violence in Israel, it was just a little one, guess what a video came on line that youtube deleted, them guys mess up the streets in Israel, big time.

 Nelson, now you are within my web, my Israel, the rights of my people to say no, the rights of my people to even be allowed to comment against cashless in Israel, even on the internet.

 Where do you even get off with comments in support to Soros and his kinship to the Rothschild.

 It was never to be know that George Soros, Schwartz György is a Rothschild.

 Enjoy your night Nelson, as the true Israelite's of Mose speak up.

Now that is what I call a comment...:)

See ya in the morning...:)

You're a complete... dunce.  I certainly don't support Soros...Are you an Israeli citizen? If so, when was the last time you were in Israel? As for a true Israelite... we will just have to take your word for that, as we do not have any reason to believe you are lying... albeit, that is possible.

By the way... stop reading things that are not there into my posts... I don't support Soros or the Rothschilds, nor any other radial leftist.  Perhaps you can supply us with some examples of where I support Soros or the Rothschilds...

Banking in America is not under the sole prerogative of Soros or the Rothschilds... In the USA, Congress controls who operates a Federally Chartered Bank... not Soros or the Rothschilds.  There are thousands of Banks and financial institutions that offer banking services in the US. Most have no binding connection to them.

Show some respect for your elders... I am certain your family didn't raise you to be such an abrasive and disrespectful adolescent...

Ronald your a complete dunce, double dipped in the mud, a old stick in the mud, we all ready know Bank Of America Belongs to Israel...where have you been for the last 30 year.....:)

Ding Bat Alert...:)

 But...George Soros, Schwartz György is a Rothschild.

Boy can I make a mess out of the the banking with that...:)

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service