The left is not going to be happy over this, as Donald Trump's Military Operations is exposed against ISIS. Israel have conducted a bombing campaign over Syria, just one day after President Putin liberated the country from ISIS.

Israel bomb hell out of Syria following ISIS defeat

The Israeli army attacked an anti-aircraft battery near Damascus Monday after it claimed a Syrian SA5-type missile attempted to target Israel Air Force planes.

Haaretz.com reports:  The Syrian missile did not hit its Israeli targets but the Israel Defense Forces decided to hit the battery, the army said.

The army targeted the battery with four bombs and, according to the IDF, the battery was damaged to the extent it was no longer operational. The army said the battery targeted was the same that fired at Israeli jets last March, prompting Israel make use of its Arrow anti-missile system for the first time.


The Syrian military warned of “dangerous consequences” following the rare strike, claiming that they successfuly hit an Israeli jet during the strike. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded to the strike, saying that “today they attempted to hit our planes,” calling the incident “unacceptable.” He added that “if anyone attempts to harm us, we will harm them back.”

Israel believes Syrian forces fired out of assumption that the Israeli planes intended to attack. The Israeli army spokesperson told reporters that the planes were instead on a reconnaissance mission in Lebanon, photographing sites for Israeli intelligence.

“The Syrian regime is responsible for any firing from its territory. We see this incident as a clear provocation and we will not allow it,” said Ronen Manlis, an IDF spokesperson in a briefing with reporters.

“If anti-aircraft fire is being carried out for any military activity, we will respond as we did now,” he said.

The Syrian missiles were fired at IDF planes on a routine photographic mission that flew into Lebanese territory, an area under the protection of Syrian missiles. The Israeli army says that they are prepared for the possibility of Syrian retaliation, but do see the incident is an escalation.

Before striking Syria, the IDF says it notified Russia of its intentions. The attack comes hours before Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu will arrive in Israel for an official and he will meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who is hosting him.

In September, the Israeli military struck a chemical arms plant in in Syria, foreign media reports claimed at the time. The Syrian army general command confirmed in a statement the attack on what they called a military facility, and said that two people were killed and extensive damage was caused. Israel refused to comment on the reports.

Israel has attacked convoys bringing arms to Hezbollah and groups on several Israeli fronts dozens of times over the last five years, a top Israeli military commander confirmed for the first time two weeks ago.

The number of Israeli attacks on such convoys since 2012 is approaching triple digits, Maj. Gen. Amir Eshel, the outgoing commander of the Israel Air Force, told Haaretz.

http://yournewswire.com/israel-bomb-syria-isis-defeat/

Views: 56

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The headline on this post is OVERSTATED... striking ONE MISSILE BATTERY is not bombing the hell out of Syria.  Israel's enemies would like nothing more than to use such headlines as propaganda to support the idea that Israel is an aggressor... when in fact, Israel was merely responding to an attack on its reconnaissance aircraft by anti-aircraft missiles fired from the battery they eliminated with a counter battery air strike.

Israel is not attacking Syria indiscriminately or unilaterally... they are merely responding to Syrian attacks on their aircraft as they attempt to engage Lebanese terrorist groups.  Syria would be well advised to stop their aggressive attempts to knock down Israeli aircraft... as long as they do, they can expect to suffer serous casualties and equipment losses.

 I do not think its over stated, and beside you was not there, and the attacks came after Russia did what they did, and Trump did what he did because of the media bashing for attacks ordered by Trump against ISIS.

 This time buddy I do not agree with ya...

LOL Tif

 

Tif...

Attacking ONE MISSILE BATTERY is not bombing the hell out of Syria... period.  Bombing the hell  out of Syria would be a criminal act... a war crime.  Israel has enough enemies attempting to smear her with such accusations we don't need to be fueling them.

Israel was simply responding in a defensive manner to Syria's attack on their aircraft flying over Lebanon's air space... by taking out the aggressive missile battery in Syria they are justified under international law.  There defensive reply to Syrian aggression is not a criminal act. 

The International Laws of War are at play here... claiming Israel BOMBED the hell out of Syria would make her in violation of the laws of war and make her a war criminal.  Let's not do that ... ok. Israel is very measured and careful about how they engage their neighbors... they are used to defending their acts as legal in the UN and various international courts and conventions.

 Like it or not Israel is now in the war against ISIS, ISIS CanKissOurAss, and I agree with this posting Russia hit ISIS, Israel took out a missile complex, that belong to ISIS, and the odds of it being funded by, Obama and Hillary Clinton, is at a all time high.

Israel Bomb The Hell Out Of Syria Following ISIS Defeat

1) ISIS doesn't have Russian made SA5 missile batters... this article was clear.. it was a Syrian SA-5 missile battery... that fired upon Israeli aircraft resulting in the Israelis taking the battery out:

2) Here is how it was reported:

"The Israeli army attacked an anti-aircraft battery near Damascus Monday after it claimed a Syrian SA5-type missile attempted to target Israel Air Force planes.

Haaretz.com reports:  The Syrian missile did not hit its Israeli targets but the Israel Defense Forces decided to hit the battery, the army said.

The army targeted the battery with four bombs and, according to the IDF, the battery was damaged to the extent it was no longer operational."

3) Four Bombs don't make for bombing the hell out of Syria and Syrian missile batteries are not ISIS units... Dang, are you able to read?  Let's try to keep the sensationalism out of our comments.  Israel has enough problems in trying to keep the world from labeling it a war monger and criminal. We don't need to help Israel's enemies by reporting she bomb the hell out of Syria.

Mr. Ronald Have A Nice Day Man

Israel has been involved for sometime now, this of course is not to be seen in American Media News, because of the link to Trump?

Golan Heights Fight: Syrian govt army battles after Israeli IDF's attack- YouTube

Trump Really Is 'Bombing the Shit' Out of ISIS Just Like He Promised

President Donald Trump pledged on the campaign trail to “bomb the shit” out of the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) in Iraq and Syria, and new figures reveal that he is doing just that. The United States-led coalition dropped more than 5,000 bombs on the group’s positions in August.

"Coalition airpower continued its annihilation of ISIS, releasing more than 5,075 weapons, the most of any month in the three-year campaign to defeat ISIS,” the figures released by the U.S. Air Forces Central Command showed. 

This number surpassed the previous monthly high for the campaign known as Operation Inherent Resolve, which was 4,848 in June, and double the number the year before, when it was just 2,244.

The military force said the majority of the strikes in August were conducted in support of Iraqi and Syrian ground forces battling ISIS on two fronts: to liberate the northwestern Iraqi city of Tal Afar, which has now been wrestled from the jihadist group; and the eastern Syrian city of Raqqa, where a coalition of Kurdish-Arab fighters are continuing a months-long siege.

Under the Trump administration, U.S. military commanders have been handed a greater remit to decide strike locations and the frequency of those strikes. Already, 2017 is the year with the largest number of bombs dropped by the coalition, with only three-quarters of the year passed. 

The year has seen 32,801 weapons released in the campaign against ISIS, compared to the campaign under the Obama administration, in which 30,743 were released in the whole of 2016, and 28,696 in 2015. The number of sorties is much lower than those in previous years, however, with 13,109 in 2017 so far, compared to 21,116 in 2015, and 21,181 in 2016.

The figures do not account for coalition aircraft, so they are not a full representation of the total bombing raids used against ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

Along with the Trump administration’s new strategy to defeat ISIS, the battle for the northern Iraqi city of Mosul was in play for more than half of the year.

The operation, which began in October 2016, became a nine-month slog that ended in Mosul's Old City with the capture of key buildings such as the famous Al-Nuri Mosque where ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi declared a self-proclaimed caliphate in July 2014.

Trump’s Defense Secretary James Mattis said during the operation that the military had changed its strategy and was beginning to use “annihilation tactics,” instead of attrition, to defeat the group. 

“Our intention is that the foreign fighters do not survive the fight to return home to North Africa, to Europe, to America, to Asia, to Africa, we are not going to allow them to do so,” Mattis said in May. “We are going to stop them there and take apart the caliphate.”

Increased strikes have brought increased casualties. Rights groups have condemned the U.S. coalition’s bombing raids for creating greater collateral damage. In one particular case, U.S. coalition strikes killed more than 100 people in the western Mosul neighborhood of al-Jadida.

The coalition said the building it had struck had been rigged with ISIS booby traps and resulted in a greater blast than what would have been caused by munitions. The U.N. and Mosul locals had put the death toll much higher, with some accounts reporting more than 140 civilians killed.

The coalition is also battling ISIS in Afghanistan, where the group is growing in influence in several provinces and has used the country to commit large-scale attacks in the capital, Kabul. The figures for bombs dropped in the country are the highest they have been since 2012. There were 503 “weapons released” in August, the highest total since August 2012.

see the video: http://www.newsweek.com/trump-really-bombing-shit-out-isis-just-he-...

Mr, Ronald,

 President Trump made promises to the American People, I wonder does President Trump know about the No Fly Zone Over The Tower Of Babel, and there has been no military action taken against terrorists there.

 I think it is time for the American People to know this and President Trump, creating a Rock and a Hard Place, for the United Nations seeing how they named their new building after the Tower Of Babel .

The Ultimate Anti-ISIS Video 2017 - TRUMP: "Bomb the Shit Outta Them!"- YouTube

 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester

ALERT ALERT

Newt Says What The Rest Of Us Are Thinking:
It’s Time To Throw Peter Strzok In Jail

Disgraced FBI special agent Peter Strzok, a senior member of the bureau who gained notoriety in recent months over his anti-Trump text messages to a colleague, was grilled for nearly 10 hours during a joint congressional committee hearing on Thursday.

At issue was Strzok’s anti-Trump texts to former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page that coincided with his leading of the investigations into both former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server scandal and the alleged Trump/Russia 2016 election collusion, as well as his involvement in the subsequent Robert Mueller special counsel probe.

The hearing proved to be a heated battle, as Strzok displayed an arrogant smugness in defiance of pointed questions from Republicans that he largely danced around, while Democrats sought to upend and undermine the entire hearing with a plethora of interruptions, parliamentary maneuvers and outright praise for the man who helped let Clinton off the hook while ferociously targeting Trump.

Former House speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich was less than impressed with Strzok’s performance and cooperation in the hearing and suggested during an appearance on Fox Business that the FBI agent should be held in contempt of Congress.

“I think they have to move to hold him in contempt and throw him in jail,” Gingrich said of Congress and Strzok.

“This is a person who is willfully standing up and refusing to appear as a congressional witness and he was a government employee at the time,” he continued.

“He has every obligation to inform the legislative branch, and I don’t think they have any choice except to move a motion of contempt because he is fundamentally — and so is his girlfriend (Page) — they’re both fundamentally in violation of the entire constitutional process,” he added.

Page had been subpoenaed to appear before Congress on Wednesday but refused to appear, saying she’d been unable to review relevant documents prior to the scheduled hearing, a closed-door hearing that has since been rescheduled for Friday.

Gingrich was not the only one who thought Strzok deserved to be held in contempt of Congress, as House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte informed Strzok that he remained at risk of such during the hearing, according to The Daily Caller.

That warning from Goodlatte came after Strzok had refused to answer a straightforward question posed by House Oversight Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, regarding how many people Strzok had personally interviewed between a specific set of dates in relation to the Clinton email investigation.

“Mr. Strzok, please be advised that you can either comply with the committee’s direction to answer the question or refuse to do so,” Goodlatte stated. “The latter of which will place you in risk of a contempt citation and potential criminal liability. Do you understand that? The question is directed to the witness.”

Strzok still refused to answer, citing instructions received from his counsel and the FBI to not answer certain questions on certain topics.

Goodlatte replied, “Mr. Strzok, in a moment we will continue with the hearing, but based on your refusal to answer the question, at the conclusion of the day we will be recessing the hearing and you will be subject to recall to allow the committee to consider proceeding with a contempt citation.”

It is unclear if Goodlatte and the committee ultimately did consider a contempt citation for Strzok following the contentious hearing, nor is it clear if Page will be held in contempt for blowing off her subpoenaed appearance on Wednesday.

Hopefully Congress will follow through on the threats of contempt followed by actual jail time against Strzok and Page in response to their uncooperative behavior and failure to appear when subpoenaed, if only to ensure that future witnesses called before Congress for sensitive or contentious hearings don’t think they can get away with the same sort of behavior.

TEA PARTY TARGET

Cops Sent To Seize Veteran’s Guns Without A Warrant, He Refused To Turn Them Over

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” says Leonard Cottrell, after successfully staving off law enforcement and the courts from confiscating his firearms. Cottrell, an Iraq War veteran, was at work when he received a phone call from his wife. The cops were there, busting in to take his guns away. It all started after a casual conversation his son had at school.

Ammoland reports:

Police said their visit was sparked by a conversation that Leonard Cottrell Jr.’s 13-year-old son had had with another student at the school. Cottrell said he was told his son and the other student were discussing security being lax and what they would have to do to escape a school shooting at Millstone Middle School.

The conversation was overheard by another student, who went home and told his parents, and his mother panicked. The mom then contacted the school, which contacted the State Police, according to Cottrell.

The visit from the troopers came around 10 p.m. on June 14, 2018, Cottrell said, a day after Gov. Phil Murphy signed several gun enforcement bills into law.

After several hours, Cottrell said police agreed not to take the guns but to allow him to move them to another location while the investigation continued.

“They had admitted several times that my son made no threat to himself or other students or the school or anything like that,” he said.

Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was “not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing.”

The troopers searched his son’s room and found nothing, Cottrell said.

“To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” he said. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

“In the Garden State, the usual approach is to confiscate first and ask questions later, and victims of this approach often don’t know their rights. ‎In this case, the victim pushed back and confiscation was avoided — but the circumstances surrounding the incident are outrageous. A student expressing concern over lack of security is not a reason to send police to the student’s home — but it might be a reason to send police to the school to keep students and teachers safe” said Scott L. Bach, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs and a member of the NRA board of directors.

NJ.com adds:

Cottrell, a disabled U.S. Army veteran who served three tours during “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” owns a shotgun and a pistol. He has all the correct permits to own the firearms, he said, and predominately uses the shotgun to hunt.

He said his wife allowed the officers to enter the home, and with her permission, they searched his son’s room — but they did not find any weapons, he said. The officers, he said, didn’t have a warrant but still wanted to take his guns. Cottrell wouldn’t let them.

“No one from the state was going to take my firearms without due process,” he said Thursday.

He said the attempted seizure resulted because of a new law Gov. Phil Murphy signed into law that makes it easier for police to confiscate guns when someone in the state poses a threat to themselves or others. The law is part of a broader statewide effort to make New Jersey’s gun laws even tougher amid the national outcry for more gun control in the wake of the school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Cottrell said the officers “danced around the issue” when he confronted them about the new law.

A New Jersey State Police spokesman declined to answer questions about whether this incident had anything to do with the new gun laws.

In an email, Sgt. First Class Jeff Flynn said, “Troopers responded to Mr. Cottrell’s residence in reference to the report of a possible school threat. Based on their investigation, it was determined that Mr. Cottrell’s weapons did not need to be seized.”

David Codrea, writing for Ammoland, further added:

To appease everybody, I had my firearms stored someplace else,” New Jersey gun owner and Army veteran Leonard Cottrell Jr. told New Jersey 101.5 after a June 14 visit from State Police,. “That way, during the course of the investigation, my son doesn’t have access to them and it’s on neutral ground and everything and everybody’s happy.”

Cottrell was recalling state troopers showing up at his door to confiscate firearms after his 13-year-old son was overheard discussing lax school safety with a friend.

Indoctrinated by a pervasive snitch culture — one that never seems to deter the blatantly obvious demonic nutjobs — the eavesdropping student told his parents, who told school administrators, who in turn called the cops. (Note “If you see something, say something” carries risks of its own – if you report the wrong person, you could end up smeared as a “hater.”)

“Cottrell said he made it very clear to the police that he was ‘not going to willingly give up my constitutional rights where there’s no justifiable cause, no warrants, no nothing,’” the report continued. Despite that, his home is now a “gun free zone” and that has been publicized by the media. He has, in fact, willingly ceded those rights, and by his own words in order to make authorities “happy.”

Before judging him for that, consider the environment that is New Jersey. Then consider the overwhelming force the state can bring to bear, and its predisposition to using it, especially if it’s to enforce citizen disarmament. It’s easy to anonymously declare “Molon Labe” on the internet. In meatspace, resistance is more effective when the aggressor doesn’t get to dictate the time and place, especially if that place is your home and you have family inside.

Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible. It’s like throwing a scrap of flesh to a circling pack of jackals and expecting them to be sated and leave you alone — instead of sensing opportunity and fear, and moving in closer.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service