ISIS Suicide Bomber Identified As Former Guantanamo Detainee

A photograph released by ISIS of a suicide bomber in Mosul has been confirmed as British ex-Guantanamo detainee Jamal Al-Harith, who, as we previously detailed, fled to Syria after his release.

U.S. officials have said that about 30 percent of released detainees are suspected to have returned to the battlefield, including at least 12 freed during the administration of President George W. Bush who went on to launch attacks that killed about a half-dozen Americans. The exact number remains classified.

In January we noted a jihadi from Britain who claims to be a former Guantanamo Bay detainee has fled to Syria where he is now fighting for Al Qaeda.

Al-Britani claims he ‘spent years’ at Guantanamo Bay, where more than 700 of the world’s most dangerous Islamic terrorists were imprisoned in the aftermath of 9/11. 

In an online magazine for fanatics, he writes: ‘Sitting in the blessed land of al-Shaam [Greater Syria], reflecting on those weeks and days spent behind bars, I thank Allah for releasing me and providing me with the opportunity of carrying out jihad in his path again.’ 

Al-Britani is the second British ex-Guantanamo detainee known to have fled to Syria to join jihadi groups. In October, it was reported that Muslim convert Jamal al-Harith, from Manchester, had fled to Syria to join Islamic State (IS). 

 At the time, he was reportedly fighting near Aleppo.

 

Al-Britani, who claims to be in his 30s, says he was in Afghanistan when the US-led coalition invaded the country in 2001.

 He claims that he was based in the Tora Bora mountains when US troops arrived hunting for then Al Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden. Al-Britani and ten others were ordered to cross into Pakistan, where locals would help them travel to Lahore.

And now, as Channel4 reports, a family member and another independent source have confirmed to Channel 4 News that the picture, released by Islamic State,  is that of Jamal Al-Harith, born Ronald Fiddler, of Manchester.

read more:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-21/isis-suicide-bomber-identi...

Views: 592

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Big Surprise.

THANK YOU OBAMA & I THINK YOU SHOULD FINISH HIS SENTENCE AT GITMO

YOU WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

 

This is what happens when you allow a Bleeding Heart Liberal to occupy the White House.  It's identical for those in Congress and other areas of the Federal Government.  Obama's 8 years needs to be wiped from history...it is disgusting and a inkblot on the history of a great country, and one we will be paying for for decades.  The secret dealings he had in his last days in office will take years to come to the forefront and will likely never hit the front pages of the liberal news media.

The Internet has been our savior where these dealings are not strangled by the power of the corrupt media sources.  I will be glad when the corrupt, left media dies off and the paper can be used to print the truth in our history classes that should be a mandate, from 6th grade to 12th grade.  Our children will thank us in their later years. 

 Viper

You said

''  Obama's 8 years needs to be wiped from history...  ''

(  I respectfully  disagree  )

This has to be recorded in our history so we don't make the same mistake again.

And i would like to see something written that would list the action taken by obama & how this new administration corrected it .....

I am a firm believer in the fact that our past history dictates our future

We have to learn from our mistakes

I'm sure you agree

A friend always 

Wes

AGREED

Agreed!

Well of course, another of Obama's MUSLIM BROTHERS was released from Gitmo to KILL AGAIN.  Gitmo was the EXACT right place for this animal.

Barack Hussein Obama, being the good Muslim that he is, being as smart as he is, and as "compassionate" knows so much more than anyone else, now has MORE BLOOD on HIS hands!

OSHITHEAD COULDN'T CARE LESS ABOUT 'BLOOD ON HIS HANDS'......

WHERE'S THE MONEY.................

OSCUMBAG AND 'BIG MIKE' ARE OFF ON ANOTHER VACATION.......

Can't we charge these killing to 0bama and bring him to trial?

YOU'RE THE BEST....I SAY IT AGAIN.....THE BEST.......

OBUTTHOLE SUCKS...

MAYBE THAT'S WHY HE'S SO POPULAR AMONG THESE DEVILS........

All the blame is on the dope in the white house and we all know who that was!!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service