ISIS Calls on Followers 'Take Revenge' for New Zealand Terror Attack

 This video has been carefully edited to meet YouTube guidelines but According to YouTube ISIS Terrorist are Listed as a Criminal Organization. Leaving out terrorist. Posted on and by Richard Hall, Lizzie Dearden 20-03-2019, the video was released on 2019-04-18.

ISIS Calls on Followers 'Take Revenge' for New Zealand Terror Attack on Bitchute

Views: 170

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

ISIS Terrorist are Listed as a Criminal Organization, right sure thing, YouTube just feel off the cliff...:)-

 So They YouTube said ISIS is a criminal organization???? Not Terrorist, this is like da!!!!

Sounds like Muslims that work for YouTube that are ISIS supporters???? Deleted the video.

 No wonder youtube took down the video, it exposed ISIS targets.

 Seeing how Nelson continues to disrespect members here, I will bring this video content back up on top. I have watch and learned how to use this sites blog very well, thank you Tif and friends.

Are you sure that the image on the right side wasnot left there as a decoy... While the left side of the video remains untouched... The far right is now questioned for its authenticity... who knows, only the shadow knows.  

I do know this ... Don't go to a UK Dentist to have your teeth whitened...not until this mystery is cleared up...  after all, we do know that white supremist are... White... and that whiter teeth may result in you being hacked by ISIS or targeted by a White Supremist.

Like Da!!!!! Ronald!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! come on email them...:)

 Here is their email address, used by ISIS supporters,  tell them your the FBI, and to come out with their hands up...:)

o0drigut3yrfg4@mozej.com

 Go ahead Ronald, email them, what are ya Chicken...:)

that email address is connected to the video...:)

This video and its subject matter is a JOKE... UK Dental Hacked by ISIS... So, ISIS is now interested in Dental Hygene and your impacted molars... get real.  This entire subject and blog needs to be removed from this site.  It has no value... we already know ISIS Is hacking everyone they can ... looking to create havoc with our systems.

 Others found the video serous, and of course it is all under control according to this Government, seeing it was brought up, them trucks from Japan, I also remember them blogs and videos, so tell us why the US did not stop the sell of them trucks to terrorist ?

 We did contact the UK,

thank you Mr. Nelson

let me do it this way, to copy and paste the photo here.

 ISIS video has the same image to the right hand side as well as the dental image to the right hand side.

 I do agree with you, Hank and Tif, I also remember where terrorist hacked US drones.

 I can not wait for the internet wars to start, we will hammer the system until it bleeds.

 

Guardian Dental Care UK: ISIS Threat- YouTube

Internet wars... you will be in jail before you can  count to 10 if you attempt to take down the internet... look, you have no idea of the governments capability to locate and incarcerate... under the patriot act you could be considered a domestic terrorist... arrested, and incarcerated without due process.  Be aware of what you are doing... as it may well cost you what freedom you have left.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service