Is Trump Right? Guess Which Rapists Don’t Appear on National Sex Offender Registry

Donald-TrumpThe national database of sex offenders is missing one crucial sub-element of society — illegal immigrants.

CNN’s John Walsh fought for years to get a national database of sex offenders — like the one who kidnapped and murdered his son, Adam Walsh.

The result was the National Sex Offender Public Registry.

There’s only one problem. The registry only lists the names of offenders who are U.S. citizens — it doesn’t include people who are living here illegally . . .

“How can a country, that can put a Mars Rover on Mars to send back pictures of ice crystals at a cost of $44 billion not be able to track convicted offenders, especially sex offenders — especially illegal alien sex offenders,” Walsh asked CNN host Erin Burnett. (Read more from “Is Trump Right? Guess Which Rapists Don’t Appear on National Sex Offender Registry” HERE)

Views: 803

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

John Walsh is right but do you really think Obama would allow this? he is all about the destruction of America as we know it and the anarchist in chief. He is constantly putting this country into needless turmoil all aimed at taking her down from within!

You know......the plain and simple fact is that we don't care what Obama will allow!!!  It's now all about what WE THE PEOPLE will allow and if Congress doesn't get busy doing their job, it is going to fall on WE THE PEOPLE.  Trust me when I say we are not spineless and gutless wonders!  We will get the job done. 

Illegal aliens are a protected class of people. Excluded from the Sex Offender Registry and in California not eligible for the death penalty. 

So illegal aliens are elevated to a position above Americans themselves! Incredible!

Oh yes, right now they are sitting at the top because they are 2016 voter fraud!!!  They may think they are smart but we are ready for them this time and if all those who give up so easily will do what they have to do and stand up with the rest of Constitutional Conservative Americans, we WILL get it done!!!

That can easily be changed. 

You don't think Obama cares about American kids do you? He hates all things AMERICAN.

That's for sure, Shirley!

Welcome to the obummer nation.

These are Obama's chosen people, why would he want any of them registered in any category. 

You know who else is NOT on the National Sex Offender List?   And, even Congress found him guilty of Sex Crimes.  Yep, Mr Bill Clinton, himself.  Clinton passed the National Sex Offender Laws when he was President, yet he IS above the law and has NOT been put on the list for Sexual Offense to the White House Interns despite found guilty of lying about his Sexual Encounters with the Female Interns.  We even hear from time-to-time he still on the hunt for "female" companionship other than Hillary.

I know a few people who were put on the list for accidental exposure and non-intentional crimes against children.  They were put on the list ONLY so Politicians could pass a Law that is more Harmful then Justified.

One of the people put on the list was from a Consensual engagement when he was in H.S.  He had JUST turned 18 and he and his g/f (she was 16) had just broken up when the PARENTS called the cops against him.  They had been dating for several years before the breakup.  In 1992, when the First Registry lists began, he lost his job, home,  respect in his community and church, wife, family and everything else he had achieved as an adult due to "breakup" in the 1960's!

There are many Parents who are on the list just because their Children "caught them in the act" as children will do at times when they are under 8 years of age.  Yet, these accidental "crimes" are still prosecuted as if they were intentional, and the Parents are afraid to confront their children in court as not to put them under the onus of what the Law does to families for unintentional exposure.

It doesn't matter to the Justice System, as this is another way to control LEGAL U.S.Citizens, and to ensure they are criminals to be controlled by the Political System for the rest of their life, even IF they NEVER comment another crime in their life.  These citizens are screwed, and have become lower then the Illegal Immigrants!  There are those that belong on this list, but not as many as who ARE on the list.

But, the reason illegals ARE NOT placed on these list: It would mean Obama's immigration plans has failed, and Obama NEVER fails, for he pretends to be Black, and telling him he failed means we are being Racist against him and he will get other Racist Blacks to rally and protest against people who tells him his policies have failed.

Bill Cosby & Obama?




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service