Acting Asst. Sec. Susan Thornton and EAP team en route to her nomination hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee!
Thanks to our federal government, the American people remain in peril. Terrorists continue to take advantage of Barack Obama’s fraudulent refugee program by infiltrating an unknown number of Islamic extremists into our country. Coupled with unrestricted border entry, the rising tide of illegal immigrants represents a growing danger to the American public. And this is precisely whatObama wants. The ongoing invasion of the nation by America-hating, inferior stock is an important part of the “fundamental transformation” of the United States that Obama has spoken of throughout his years in the White House.
Of course, White House press secretary Josh Earnest continues to extol the virtues of the intensive screening involved in the Regime’s imaginary two year vetting process. It doesn’t seem to matter that both the FBI and DHS have stated that the vetting of Muslim refugees is not possible because paperwork containing the individual histories needed to screen them doesn’t exist.
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) made the chilling statement that “the threat that we now face is greater than since the days after 9/11. I believe 2015 will be seen as a watershed year when our enemies have gained a foothold in the spread of terrorism.”
Fortunately the American people are paying attention to thedanger the left has put them in and it appears they are damned tired of it. The nation, with or without the assistance of this administration, needs to move forward quickly with encryption, profiling and closing the borders to all illegal immigrants. But how can it be accomplished given that the Republican-controlled Senate has supported the agenda of the Democrat Party rather than that of the American people?
What will the administration do at this point? Many believe Obama will continue the intentional destruction of our country. Some accuse this Regime of being a sort of “sleeper cell,” given its Marxist/Islamic agenda. Obama has willing accomplices at the New York Times, the Washington Post and a plethora of websites and organizations financed by the likes of George Soros and his Open Society Institute. It is their intention to destroy the United States in order to bring forth a New World Order based upon models conceived by the United Nations. They continue to divide the country by race and class while pushing for open borders and regulating business to the point of bankruptcy.
But leftist politicians who have spent decades buying the allegiance of permanent ne’er do wells with American tax dollars may soon get a lesson in payback from those who have been forced to foot the bill. Concerned that American voters might finally be ready to do something about the corruption of politicians in both political parties, the liberal media has been joined by both Democrats and Republicans in a serious attempt to drive Donald Trump from the 2016 Election; the motivating factor—fear. For neither “reason” nor intimidation will succeed in bringing a self-made, billionaire individualist under the control of D.C freebooters and autocrats.
Having accomplished so much, a president Trump may want to leave his mark on history by replacing pan handlers with workers and bureaucrats with businessmen. Opening America to oil exploration and re-invigorating the coal industry could have the U.S. energy-independent in 10 years or less. The military can berebuilt and its purpose redirected from serving political correctness to defending the United States. Liberals would be replaced by conservatives throughout the federal bureaucracy.
All of these things and a great many more could be accomplished by an honest president who is supported by the American people. And if as many American voters are as fed up with Marxist liars as I believe there are, the first true, non-politician might enter the White House in 2016.
No wonder news readers, Democrats and Republicans elites areworried.
As for the open border in Texas, I say set up a firing line and shoot them in between the two countries. After all the way I see it their people with out a country and fair game.
Not sure. I was at a xmas party this weekend and of course the conversation turned to politics. There were several women there who were making comments about Trump always saying the most outrageous things. Then they asked me what I thought about him. I told them I was perfectly happy with a guy who did not worry about being politically correct and it was refreshing to not have to listen to someone stuttering because they were afraid to speak for fear of offending someone. I told them I liked him and Cruz. One of them said "Who is he". She then said she did not pay attention to politics. these women were engineers at a very large company and had no idea what was going on. These are people who make good money so do not feel the misery many Americans feel. There are too many of them out there. I now believe that we have too many low info voters on our side also.
America is divided into three camps. The dedicated Conservatives, the dedicated subversives, and the weak-minded. The weak-minded were targeted by behavioral specialists during that last election.
The size of this group could be decisive.
I do have one complaint about some Conservatives; those who stayed home during the last election. I didn't like Romney much either; but look what the alternative gave us. I hope these guys got smarter.
you both seem to believe that the only learning to be done is by those who wouldn't vote for Romney.
IMO - one would think that by now, after 30 years of failure of concept, it'd be more apparent that those insisting R party's candidate will be a barely lesser evil (establishment elite, rank+file R members, whoever) have an epiphany due as well.
yeah, uh-huh, okay... sure.
1st - maybe your post wasn't clear in what you were addressing?? .. it read to me you were responding to his lamenting of people not showing up to vote for Romney - the partisan mantra of R party. - maybe it's you who should think while typing?
2nd.. I'm all for exercising article V, a lot like it was done for the 21st amendment. But ya'lls ONLY WAY IS A COS b.s. is far from being thoughtful. maybe it's YOU who should just try thinking in general??
You missed my point entirely. If the alternative is between a DemonCrat and a weak Republican, there may be a miniscule difference; but if it's between a DemonCrat and Cruz, there is no contest.
Huckabee is already making noises about Cruz not being Conservative enough, but Cruz is so far and above everyone else, he's our last option; there is no excuse for staying home this time.
I should emphasize, our last peaceful option. There is certainly violence coming; but civilization will not prevail if God forbid, another Bush enters the White House. If Democrats keep control, it is all over my friend.
I have wrote about this as well:
The nation, with or without the assistance of this administration, needs to move forward quickly with encryption, profiling and closing the borders to all illegal immigrants.
encryption?? in what way?
it's very foolish to advocate limiting data encryption on the internet.
. it would make privacy of your electronic data a dead concept. your personal stuff as well as your official stuff - like banking information.
. it would kill business' ability to transmit data over the internet with reasonable expectations of security. that would include online sales/purchases as well as intrabusiness file transfers.
limiting encryption on the internet would be a monumental privacy and economy killing mistake.
I didn't make it clear and forthat Iapologize. What I meant was putting our best and brightest to work to break the encryption that the Islamists are using.
thanx.. was why I asked - 'in what way'. That's the right answer imo too.
Sometimes I think a lot of people probably don't have an understanding of what encryption is and assume it's some kind of complicated electronic magic.
Encryption is only a mathematically formula agreed on by two computers (the sending computer and the receiving computer), to scramble and unscramble the 0s and 1s within a data packet as it's transmitted onto a circuit or into the air. It's not magic, it's just math and code breaking is just figuring out the formula which was agreed on.
I think the bureaucrats who are advocating limiting encryption probably have no clue about that stuff either... think it must be some kind of electronic wizardry.