Irony: Obama DOJ’s Immigration Suit Against AZ Laid Foundation For Trump’s Suit Against CA

  President Donald Trump’s Justice Department filed a suit against the state of California on Tuesday modeled after one brought against Arizona by former President Barack Obama’s DOJ, which affirmed the federal government’s authority to set immigration policy.

By Randy DeSoto
March 7, 2018 at 11:13am

 In 2010, then Attorney General Eric Holder sued Arizona over state law S.B. 1070, which — in accordance with federal law — required any aliens in the United States to have proper identification at all times, and empowered state law enforcement officers to attempt to determine immigration status during “lawful stop, detention or arrest” for other suspected crimes.

 Additionally, it barred state and local officials or agencies from restricting enforcement of immigration laws, and imposed penalties on sheltering, hiring or transporting unregistered aliens.

“Setting immigration policy and enforcing immigration laws is a national responsibility,” Holder stated at the time regarding his decision to sue Arizona over the law. “Seeking to address the issue through a patchwork of state laws will only create more problems than it solves.”

 Holder further argued that the Constitution “forbids” Arizona from replacing federal policy “with its own state-specific immigration policy.”

 The Supreme Court, by-in-large, agreed with the Obama administration’s argument, finding immigration law is the purview of the federal government. However, it did affirm the ability of state law enforcement officials to seek to ascertain the immigration status of those stopped for other suspected criminal activity.

“The National Government has significant power to regulate immigration,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion. “Arizona may have understandable frustrations with the problems caused by illegal immigration while that process continues, but the State may not pursue policies that undermine federal law.”

 Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ DOJ plans to make exactly that point in a case filed in federal court in Sacramento.

 He announced the case in the state’s capital on Wednesday. “A refusal to apprehend and deport (illegal aliens), especially the criminal element, effectively rejects all immigration law. It’s a rejection of law and creates and open borders system,” he told a gathering of state and local law enforcement officials.

 Sessions specifically singled out Oakland’s Mayor Libby Schaff, who tipped off criminal illegal aliens of an impending Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid in the city.

“So here’s my message to Mayor Schaff,” Sessions said. “How dare you, how dare you needlessly endanger the lives of our law enforcement officers to promote a radical open borders agenda?”

Politico reported the DOJ’s suit against California is modeled after the one brought by the Obama administration.

 RELATED: Federal Judge Secures Massive DACA Win For Trump… Changes Underway ...

 The lawsuit alleges obstruction of federal immigration enforcement and targets three “sanctuary state” focused laws passed by the legislature in 2017.

 S.B. 54 prohibits state and local officials from sharing information with federal immigration officials and also bars the transfer of certain immigrants into federal custody.

 A.B. 450 forbids private employers from cooperating with the federal government with immigration enforcement at the workplace.

 Finally, A.B. 103 attempts to regulate detention facilities used by the federal government to hold immigration prisoners.

 California Gov. Jerry Brown accused the Trump administration of pulling a “political stunt” by filing the suit.

“At a time of unprecedented political turmoil, Jeff Sessions has come to California to further divide and polarize America. Jeff, these political stunts may be the norm in Washington, but they don’t work here. SAD!!!” Brown wrote on Twitter.

 Meanwhile, the Golden State’s Attorney General Xavier Becerra claimed that the new laws are in compliance with the Constitution and other federal laws.

“We’re following the Constitution and federal law,” he told reporters in a conference call on Tuesday. “We’re doing nothing to intrude in the work of the federal government to do immigration enforcement. We recognize and respect that the federal government has authority over immigration enforcement.”

https://www.westernjournal.com/irony-obama-dojs-immigration-suit-ag...

 

Views: 89

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

If the President and AG Sessions were actually interested in stopping California from aiding and abetting, from felony harboring illegal aliens they would arrest and prosecute the State Officials who actively engage in such unlawful practices.  However, it is obvious they are not interested in enforcing the law, by holding those violating the law accountable, under the law.

It is time that the people demand their State and Federal officials obey the laws.... or be charged and prosecuted for ignoring them.  There are many Federal Statutes that can be applied to the illegal conduct of State Officials (elected, appointed or civil service). Do it... enforce the law, stop with the BULL SHIT. The People are not fooled or pleased by such CRIMINAL CONDUCT... That's right, the AG and President are both guilty of 'Misprions of a Felony' for failing to prosecute those they know are breaking our laws.  Obstruction of Justice may also apply where they deliberately ignore the law and permit individuals to violate the laws of the United States.

P/S There is no Federal Law which permits  'Prosecutorial Discretion'.  Prosecutorial Discretion' is a fancy term for 'Selective Prosecution' and 'Misprision of a Felony', both are unlawful acts. It is time that the People demand that the law is enforced... Stop prosecutorial discretion and the phony civil lawsuits, which ignore the underlying criminal conduct.

It is time that the people demand their State and Federal officials obey the laws....LMAO over that......

Until the People take PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MANAGING THEIR SERVANTS the rule of law and Constitutional government will never return to America.  Laughing will not help... spoofing what is necessary will not help... Hank will not help.

Lawsuits do not belong with violating law. Arrests are what is called for. This is nonsense, wasting our money and more time. Time is short and getting shorter. He needs to make some arrests, according to the law. All of this is nonsense.

Absolutely, civil lawsuits are not what the law calls for... those violating or obstructing the law have committed CRIMINAL OFFENSES and need to be charged, arrested, arraigned and tried... and if found guilty by a jury of their peers JAILED and FINED.

It is the Deep State and the Establishment who have perpetrated this hoax on America... that the political and senior bureaucrats should not be arrested for crimes committed while in office... Instead, taxpayer dollars are being wasted by suing these miscreants and the State; levying the legal costs, fees, and lost time, for such actions on the taxpayers.  Stop this insanity now.

Arrest the Governor of California, the Attorney General, the mayors, and city councils/county supervisors for every sanctuary city and county in the State... arraign them and have them post a bond or keep them in jail until they are tried and either convicted or acquitted.  In any event, these individuals are not above our criminal statutes... they are breaking the law by 'obstructing justice' and aiding and abetting illegal alien trafficking among other crimes.

The President needs to advise them all that they have 30 days to conform to the laws of the United States or they WILL BE ARRESTED and tried for their crimes.  No one is above the law. That includes governors, Attorney Generals, Mayors, City Councils, and senior bureaucrats in the government who choose to obstruct justice or to 'aid and abet' illegal alien trafficking... felony harboring is a crime, not a civil case.  Deal with the criminal conduct using the Criminal statutes, not civil suits.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

ALERT ALERT

OMG!! -> Government Now Wants To Seize Your Car For Going 5MPH Over The Limit

We’ve discussed this on and off for several years now. Civil asset forfeiture is a legal process that allows the government to seize assets and cash from citizens without any due process or judicial oversight.

You don’t even have to be charged with a crime. You are assumed guilty unless you can somehow prove your innocence.

Of course, not everyone has this ability… if you aren’t local, state, or federal law enforcement, this is called stealing, and you go to prison.

But the government is actually a bigger problem than common thieves.

A 2015 report showed that law enforcement used civil asset forfeiture to steal more from US residents than every thief, robber, and burglar in America combined.

About $4.5 BILLION worth of cash, cars, homes, and other property is taken by civil asset forfeiture each year – hundreds of millions more than common criminals steal.

And it happens at every level. Your local cop can use civil asset forfeiture just like your state trooper. And then any one of the armed agents of the US government—from the FBI to the Fish and Wildlife Service—can rob you for whatever reason they want.

This travesty continues to grow because the cops who take your stuff get to keep it. Police departments and government agencies around the country depend on civil asset forfeiture to boost their budgets.

Cops will literally keep some of the cars they take as squad cars. And they make a fortune auctioning off the houses, boats, and anything else they confiscate.

Obviously this gives cops an incentive to steal, whether or not they actually think the property was used in a crime, or acquired illegally. Remember, civil asset forfeiture adds billions every year to their bottom line.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in a case of civil asset forfeiture.

Tyson Timbs was convicted of selling a small amount of drugs to an undercover police officer. He was sentenced to house arrest, and paid about $1,200 in fines.

But then police used civil asset forfeiture to take his $42,000 Land Rover which Timbs purchased with money from a life insurance policy after his father died. The money did not come from selling drugs, or any other illegal activity.

Timbs sued, and the case made its way to the Supreme Court, because every lower court in Indiana said the forfeiture was perfectly legit.

The case revolves around whether or not the seizure of the Land Rover was an excessive fine under the 8th amendment, and whether or not this protection against excessive fines applies to state governments.

And the public got some crazy insight into the government’s position.

The Indiana Solicitor General was arguing in favor of civil asset forfeiture when Justice Stephen Breyer asked him a hypothetical.

Breyer asked, if a state needs revenue, could it force someone to forfeit their Bugatti, Mercedes, or Ferrari for speeding? Even if they were going just 5 miles per hour over the speed limit?

And the utterly appalling answer from the Indiana Solicitor General was, yes.

That’s right… the official government position is that they can steal any amount of your property in “connection” with any crime whatsoever, no matter how trivial the crime may be… even exceeding the speed limit by 5 miles per hour.

This is how overbearing and authoritarian the government has become in the land of the free.

This is how much power your local cop has… and the power only grows as you go to state, and federal officials.

If there is any solace in any of this, it is that the other Supreme Court Justices were reportedly laughing at this exchange.

The justices seemed incredulous that Indiana’s top lawyer was using such absurd assertions and flimsy reasoning in his arguments.

So, for now, we can keep our cars if we get pulled over for speeding. But that may not always be the case…

Depending on how this is ruled, it could pave the way for even more egregious abuses of power… or it could curb the practice, and reign in these thieves in uniforms.

Just understand where the government is coming from. These politicians, bureaucrats and officers think they can do whatever they want. Absolutely anything goes, with no limitation whatsoever.

And that makes it a little tough to feel like you really live in the land of the free.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service