International Programs- U.S.-U.K. Social Security Agreement

 There has never been any real secret that Lloyds of London England played a roll in financing the SS. Lloyds of London England Social Security Treaty.

 Agreement and administrative agreement both signed at London February 13, 1984;
entered into force January 1, 1985, except Part III of the agreement entered into force January 1, 1988.

 Amended by supplementary agreement and supplementary administrative agreement signed at London June 6, 1996, entered into force September 1, 1997.

Read Gov text: https://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Texts/uk.html

Views: 76

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes he does, he has bitc*hed about them in several blogs.

WHAT ARE YOU BLIND... I am the one who brought up the discussion of FIAT CURRENCY... Iam fully aware how the money supply works under the Federal Reserve... system.

 Rothschild British owned Fed SS. IRS, and what ever...:)

LOL Tif

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/xn/detail/4301673:Comment:4653660

Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) on April 28, 2018 at 8:56am

The Wealthy are manipulating the worlds FIAT CURRENCY... to purchase real assets: land, minerals, the means of production, etc... and when the FIAT CURRENCY collapses they will hold the lions share of the worlds real assets. The rest of the world will hold 'paper currency' worth nothing... fiat currency.

That is why we need to have our currency backed by gold, silver or other assets of REAL VALUE... the Fed and the super rich are indeed stealing the wealth of the world. They are leveraging the inflated values of their fiat currency to acquire real assets and wealth...

When the fiat currency's of the world finally collapse the wealthy will use their real assets to acquire the remaining assets of a bankrupt world... leaving the middle class and poor to become pawns in a new age Feudal System.

Get ready, for a Patrone System, reminiscent of the worlds Feudal past... it is about to become the dominant economic model for the new world order.

So, I don't know what's going on with the use of a fiat currency as our method of exchange... check the date on this post... 

Boy that will be good for you.

Rothschild British Owned FIAT CURRENCY Federal Reserve.

What did Andrew Jackson say about Nathan Rothschild.

What did Andrew Jackson say about Nathan Rothschild. You mean Ronald did not reply...figures!!!!

 On March 4 1811 The First Bank of the United States is closed. As a result, the House of Rothschild, who had controlling stock, loses millions. This enrages Nathan Rothschild who then coerces the British Parliament to retake the colonies thus fomenting the War of 1812

 You don't say do ya, now tell me something I do not know?

Wow your guys are really something. Foreigners following the money.

Ahhh, what????????????

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service