International Programs- U.S.-U.K. Social Security Agreement

 There has never been any real secret that Lloyds of London England played a roll in financing the SS. Lloyds of London England Social Security Treaty.

 Agreement and administrative agreement both signed at London February 13, 1984;
entered into force January 1, 1985, except Part III of the agreement entered into force January 1, 1988.

 Amended by supplementary agreement and supplementary administrative agreement signed at London June 6, 1996, entered into force September 1, 1997.

Read Gov text: https://www.ssa.gov/international/Agreement_Texts/uk.html

Views: 71

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 I get to beat Hank again at this statement....figures!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ronald is a Chicken.....:)

Nothing draconian here... it is an agreement that outlines the ways US and UK workers can access US and UK social security benefits... allowing them to participate in the US and UK system of social security.

This is a good thing... for workers.  It is only reasonable that a formal and legally binding agreement secure the rights of both UK and US workers ... to participate in and recieve benefits from each others social security systems... when they pay into it and meet the requirements of this agreement.  Why not?

 I am trying not to laugh at you Mr. Nelson, but...:)- I am LMAO over this blog and your statement.

Oh I see all is good we should just move on. Its ok for the queen to amend and sign off on YOUR SS program.

Did you read Oder 1997 all of it? http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1778/made

 Accountability, past comments, past blogs, International Programs, Social Security, IRS, Slush Funds, where donations and Tax Dollars were hidden.

 EU Establishment In US Government Position, and NGO Forums.

 Yes

What... Where do come up with such minutia... the  Queen is not signing off on the Social Secuity Act... or any amendment to it.  What is happening here for the ignorant is that the US and England are formalizing the rules for its citizens to participate in the Social Security Programs of both nations... where they qualify and are working in that nation.

Such agreements between friendly governments facilitate the taxation and administration for incomes earned outside their respective jurisdictions by citizens living in the others country.. Such agreements stop much of the tax avoidance schemes used by those living outside of their nations jurisdiction, allowing them to collect or enforce their tax laws..

Misleading, sly in content, rejected.

How so Rosie... please explain how formalizing the process to qualify for and receive social security when one is a foriegn laborer in the US or UK is a bad thing. The agreement establishes tax rules and seeks to facilitate the orderly reporting of incomes and taxes for foreigners in the US or UK.

I realize that burst your bubble ... for one more international conspiracy to ... what... bankrupt the USA or social security administration... News... they are both already BK. 

 Had my say.

He doesn't understand why the Federal Reserve has to print money and all bank loans are just digital entries. No cash No currency, just paper notes. No longer do we have certificates.

Can't teach the unteachable especially if they are a product of the Public, Government Union school systems. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Fact Check:   'Joe Biden Claims ‘We Didn’t Lock People Up In Cages’

CLAIM: Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed, on immigration: “We didn’t lock people up in cages.”

VERDICT: FALSE. The “cages” were built by the Obama-Biden administration.

Univision moderator Jorge Ramos asked Biden at the third Democrat debate at Texas Southern University in Houston, Texas, why Latinos should trust him after the Obama administration continued deporting “undocumented immigrants.”

Biden claimed that the Obama administration’s policies were more humane than those of President Donald Trump: “We didn’t lock people up in cages,” he said.

In fact, the “cages” were built by the Obama administration to deal with a surge of unaccompanied minors who crossed the border illegally in 2014.

Originally, the Obama administration was “warehousing” children — literally — in overwhelmed Border Patrol facilities. Breitbart News broke the story of the surge, which was partly triggered by Obama’s policy of allowing illegal alien children who entered the country as minors to stay in the country (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA).

Above image credit: AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, Pool, File

The above photo was published by the Associated Press in June 2014, and the photo below is of Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, touring a Border Patrol facility with “cages.”


Above: Border Patrol officers escort Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Gov. Jan Brewer through the department’s Nogales processing facility for immigrant children. (Photo courtesy Barry Bahler/Department of Homeland Security)

The “cages” are chain-link enclosures in Border Patrol processing facilities that are meant to protect children from adults in custody. They are not permanent accommodations.

In mid-2018, as the Trump administration began enforcing a “zero tolerance” policy that stopped the “catch-and-release” policy of letting illegal aliens go after they were arrested. Detaining adults and children meant that children had to be processed separately; the enclosures prevented adults from harming children.

As Breitbart News reported at the time, children were not housed in “cages.” They were processed and then taken to shelters, where they were given medical care, toiletries, education, recreation, and counseling, and where staff attempted to find relatives or sponsors to whom they could be released.

Democrats began tweeting images of “kids in cages” to condemn the Trump administration. Journalists, too, shared those images.

One problem: they were taken during the Obama administration.

Public outrage at the images led President Trump to end the policy, and require families to be detained together.

Democrats keep repeating the mistake, however: in July, they had to delete a tweet that used an image from the Obama era and cited the “inhumane treatment” of children by the Trump administration.

Republicans argue that not detaining illegal aliens is actually the cruel policy, because it encourages migrants to undertake a dangerous journey, often guided by cartels and smugglers.

As Breitbart News’ Alana Mastrangelo noted recently:

But what’s worse than “cages,” however, are reports of migrant children also being handed over to human traffickers during the Obama administration — while Biden was vice president — according to the New York Times. Between October 2013 and July 2015 alone, nearly 80,000 unaccompanied children from Central American countries were detained by U.S. authorities.

It remains unclear how many of the tens of thousands of children were handed over to human traffickers — including sex traffickers — during that span of nearly two years, as those cases are reportedly not tracked.

“Others were ransomed by the very smugglers to whom their families paid thousands of dollars to sneak them into the United States,” reported the New York Times in 2015, during Obama’s presidency and Biden’s vice presidency. “Some lost limbs during the journey or found themselves sold into sexual slavery.”

Biden told voters in South Carolina last month that he would close all border detention facilities, guaranteeing that the migrant flow would continue.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service