Idaho Refugee Rape: Obama Justice Official Threatens Americans Who Criticize Migrant Programs

President Barack Obama’s top legal appointee in Idaho is threatening to prosecute Americans who criticize the federal immigration policies which enabled Sudanese and Iraqi Muslim migrants to perpetrate a vile sexual attack against a five-year-old girl in Twin Falls, Idaho.

A 14-year-old Sudanese refugee in Idaho coached a 10-year-old Sudanese and a 7-year-old Iraqi boy during the June 2 attack on the girl. The younger boys stripped the white five-year-old girl naked, touched her, and urinated on her clothes and in her mouth, while the older boy also took pictures. Their primitive abuse of the child might have continued, had it not been stopped by an elderly American who saw the older boy taking pictures at the laundry room where the boys had cornered the little girl.

Since then, locals have begun to furiously criticize the federal program that is sending migrants into their formerly peaceful city.

To reduce local protests, Obama appointee and U.S. Attorney Wendy J. Olson issued her scolding and threatening statement on Friday;

“The United States Attorney’s Office extends its support to the five-year-old victim of assault, and her family, at the Fawnbrook Apartments in Twin Falls. The United States Attorney’s Office further encourages community members in Twin Falls and throughout Idaho to remain calm and supportive, to pay close attention to the facts that have been released by law enforcement and the prosecuting attorney, and to avoid spreading false rumors and inaccuracies.”

read more:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/26/obama-appointee-...

Views: 726

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I cannot say what I want to say here BUT, I will say that this is wrong and should be handled by the local police and Prosecutor. Give them a good lawyer, take them to Court and then han*.......oops!

I'm a very tolerate man, but when it comes to children. ... they would thank God when the police arrived!!!

Just what law is broken by criticizing the DOJ lack of protection from these slimy "refugees"

No law.  This is a repeat of the Attorney Generals same threat but she had to run it back because of the outrage by free speech advocates.  This ass doesn't have the authority to enforce that comment and I would love for her to try.

Bring it bitch!

The unwritten Law is Political Correctness manufactured by the "Progressives."  You're supposed to know how to think, what to think, and when to think.  They can cram Political Correct up their rear ends where it belongs!. 

So, let me get this straight, They weren't Syrian but from other countries, so this just didn't happen? Is this going to be ignored because there is no justice in our justice department and these little bastards are going to get away with this crime and anybody that thinks this is wrong will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law?  What country have we turned into?

Does the city of Sodom and Gomorra fit the place!

American citizens are going to have to take matters into their own hands.  When the government fails to protect us citizens, it's time for a new government.  The only chance I see for that is if Donald Trump is elected President.  If that doesn't work, then the only thing left is a bloody revolution with the targets being the Washington politicians. That's why the politicians want Americans disarmed.

WHEN INJUSTICE BECOMES LAW - THEN RESISTANCE BECOMES DUTY...!

WE NEED TO [STOP] WORRYING ABOUT HOW WE MAY BE PRSECUTED UNJUSTLY AND START GROWING SOME BALLS AND FIGHT THE BASTARDS..!

THIS IS WHY WE HAVE THE 2ND AMENDMENT..!

I CAN'T BELEIVE THAT AN OLD BITCH LIKE OLSON WOULD EVEN STOOP TO THE LEVEL AS TO MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT..!

LETS ALL TAKE A PISS ON HER YOUNG GRAND DAUGHTERS- THEN I'LL BE THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY..!!!

THAT BITCH [DOSE NOT] DESERVE [ANY] PROTECTION AT ALL..!

THE UNAMERICAN WHORE..!

You, my friend, are absolutely correct! They are pushing us to the point of actual fighting. I am disgusted enough to jump right in!

The Dept. of justice is one of THE biggest JOKEs of the Oblama administration. Maybe this ditzy broad needs to have them piss all over her before she finally GETS IT.

ABSOLUTELY..!

PISS ON O'FRAUD AND ANY OTHER OF HIS DEMONIZED APPOINTED MINIONS..!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service